• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

On the logic of collapsibility for causal effect measures.

作者信息

Didelez Vanessa, Stensrud Mats Julius

机构信息

Department of Biometry and Data Management, Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology - BIPS, Bremen, Germany.

Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany.

出版信息

Biom J. 2022 Feb;64(2):235-242. doi: 10.1002/bimj.202000305. Epub 2021 Feb 12.

DOI:10.1002/bimj.202000305
PMID:33576019
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
On the logic of collapsibility for causal effect measures.关于因果效应度量的可折叠性逻辑。
Biom J. 2022 Feb;64(2):235-242. doi: 10.1002/bimj.202000305. Epub 2021 Feb 12.
2
On the collapsibility of measures of effect in the counterfactual causal framework.关于反事实因果框架中效应量度的可折叠性
Emerg Themes Epidemiol. 2019 Jan 7;16:1. doi: 10.1186/s12982-018-0083-9. eCollection 2019.
3
Correct and logical causal inference for binary and time-to-event outcomes in randomized controlled trials.随机对照试验中二元和事件发生时间结局的正确且合乎逻辑的因果推断。
Biom J. 2022 Feb;64(2):198-224. doi: 10.1002/bimj.202000202. Epub 2021 Jun 4.
4
The relation of collapsibility and confounding to faithfulness and stability. collapsibility 和 confounding 与忠实性和稳定性的关系。
Epidemiology. 2015 Jul;26(4):466-72. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000291.
5
Discussion on "Correct and logical causal inference for binary and time-to-event outcomes in randomized controlled trials" by Yi Liu, Bushi Wang, Miao Yang, Jianan Hui, Heng Xu, Siyoen Kil, and Jason C. Hsu.刘毅、王布世、杨淼、惠建安、徐恒、基西恩·基尔和许家超关于“随机对照试验中二元和事件发生时间结局的正确且逻辑合理的因果推断”的讨论
Biom J. 2022 Feb;64(2):225-234. doi: 10.1002/bimj.202000320. Epub 2020 Dec 30.
6
On the logic of causal inference.论因果推断的逻辑
Am J Epidemiol. 1986 Jun;123(6):965-79. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114349.
7
Re: "On the logic of causal inference".关于：“因果推断的逻辑”。
Am J Epidemiol. 1987 Jul;126(1):155-8.
8
Re: "On the logic of causal inference".关于：“因果推断的逻辑”
Am J Epidemiol. 1987 Sep;126(3):556-7. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114690.
9
Rejoinder for discussions on correct and logical causal inference for binary and time-to-event outcomes in randomized controlled trials.关于随机对照试验中二元结局和事件发生时间结局的正确且合乎逻辑的因果推断讨论的回应
Biom J. 2022 Feb;64(2):246-255. doi: 10.1002/bimj.202100089. Epub 2021 Jul 16.
10
Causes and logic in epidemiological psychiatry. 2. Causal models and logical inference.流行病学精神病学中的病因与逻辑。2. 因果模型与逻辑推理。
Br J Psychiatry. 1980 Dec;137:579-82.

引用本文的文献

1
How hazard ratios can mislead and why it matters in practice.风险比如何产生误导以及为何在实际应用中至关重要。
Eur J Epidemiol. 2025 Jun 27. doi: 10.1007/s10654-025-01250-9.
2
Guidelines and Best Practices for the Use of Targeted Maximum Likelihood and Machine Learning When Estimating Causal Effects of Exposures on Time-To-Event Outcomes.估计暴露因素对事件发生时间结局的因果效应时使用靶向最大似然法和机器学习的指南与最佳实践
Stat Med. 2025 Mar 15;44(6):e70034. doi: 10.1002/sim.70034.
3
Modeling the Restricted Mean Survival Time Using Pseudo-Value Random Forests.
使用伪值随机森林对受限平均生存时间进行建模。
Stat Med. 2025 Feb 28;44(5):e70031. doi: 10.1002/sim.70031.
4
Effect of metoprolol exposure following myocardial infarction on future cardiovascular events: a Mendelian randomization study.心肌梗死后美托洛尔暴露对未来心血管事件的影响：一项孟德尔随机化研究
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2025 Apr;81(4):551-560. doi: 10.1007/s00228-025-03806-w. Epub 2025 Feb 3.
5
Multiplicative versus additive modelling of causal effects using instrumental variables for survival outcomes - a comparison.使用工具变量对生存结局进行因果效应的乘法建模与加法建模——一项比较
Stat Methods Med Res. 2025 Jan;34(1):3-25. doi: 10.1177/09622802241293765. Epub 2024 Dec 10.
6
The built-in selection bias of hazard ratios formalized using structural causal models.使用结构因果模型形式化的风险比的内在选择偏差。
Lifetime Data Anal. 2024 Apr;30(2):404-438. doi: 10.1007/s10985-024-09617-y. Epub 2024 Feb 15.
7
Association of Socioeconomic Position With Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Survival After Lung Transplant.社会经济地位与肺移植后生存的种族和民族差异的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Apr 3;6(4):e238306. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.8306.
8
A comparison of covariate adjustment approaches under model misspecification in individually randomized trials.个体随机试验中模型误设下协变量调整方法的比较。
Trials. 2023 Jan 6;24(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06967-6.
9
Assessing putative bias in prediction of anti-microbial resistance from real-world genotyping data under explicit causal assumptions.在明确的因果假设下，评估从真实世界的基因分型数据中预测抗微生物耐药性的潜在偏差。
Artif Intell Med. 2022 Aug;130:102326. doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2022.102326. Epub 2022 Jun 3.
10
Planning a method for covariate adjustment in individually randomised trials: a practical guide.个体随机试验中协变量调整方法的规划：实用指南。
Trials. 2022 Apr 18;23(1):328. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06097-z.