• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较自由放养和圈养的非洲野生食草动物的抗生素耐药性。

COMPARING ANTIBIOTIC RESISTANCE IN FREE-RANGING VS. CAPTIVE AFRICAN WILD HERBIVORES.

机构信息

Vetagro-Sup, 1 avenue Bourgelat 69 280 Marcy l'Etoile, France.

ASTRE, Université Montpellier, CIRAD, INRA, 34398 Montpellier, France.

出版信息

J Wildl Dis. 2023 Apr 1;59(2):224-233. doi: 10.7589/JWD-D-21-00153.

DOI:10.7589/JWD-D-21-00153
PMID:37074787
Abstract

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a critical challenge of the 21st century for public and animal health. The role of host biodiversity and the environment in the evolution and transmission of resistant bacteria between populations and species, and specifically at the wildlife-livestock-human interface, needs to be further investigated. We evaluated the AMR of commensal Escherichia coli in three mammalian herbivore species-impala (Aepyceros melampus), greater kudu (Tragelaphus strepsiceros), and plains zebra (Equus quagga)-targeting populations living under two conditions: captivity (French zoos) and free ranging (natural and private parks in Zimbabwe). From 137 fecal samples from these three host species, 328 E. coli isolates were isolated. We measured the AMR of each isolate against eight antibiotics, and we assessed the presence of AMR genes and mobile genetic element class 1 integrons (int1). Isolates obtained from captive hosts had a higher probability of being resistant than those obtained from free-ranging hosts (odds ratio, 293.8; confidence interval, 10-94,000). This statistically higher proportion of AMR bacteria in zoos than in natural parks was especially observed for bacteria resistant to amoxicillin. The percentage of int1 detection was higher when isolates were obtained from captive hosts, particularly captive impalas. Ninety percent of bacterial isolates with genes involved in antibiotic resistance also had the int1 gene. The sul1, sul2, blaTEM, and stra genes were found in 14, 19, 0, and 31%, respectively, of E. coli with respective antibiotic resistance. Finally, plains zebra carried AMR significantly more often than the other species.

摘要

抗微生物药物耐药性(AMR)是 21 世纪公共卫生和动物健康面临的重大挑战。宿主生物多样性和环境在耐药细菌在种群和物种之间的进化和传播中的作用,特别是在野生动植物-牲畜-人类界面,需要进一步研究。我们评估了三种食草哺乳动物(黑斑羚、大角斑羚和平原斑马)共生大肠杆菌的 AMR,这些哺乳动物的目标种群生活在两种条件下:圈养(法国动物园)和自由放养(津巴布韦的自然和私人公园)。从这三个宿主物种的 137 份粪便样本中,分离出了 328 株大肠杆菌。我们测量了每种分离株对 8 种抗生素的 AMR,并评估了 AMR 基因和移动遗传元件类 1 整合子(int1)的存在。与自由放养宿主获得的分离株相比,从圈养宿主获得的分离株具有更高的耐药可能性(优势比,293.8;置信区间,10-94000)。与自然公园相比,动物园中 AMR 细菌的比例更高,尤其是对阿莫西林耐药的细菌。从圈养宿主获得的分离株中,int1 的检测率更高,尤其是圈养的黑斑羚。携带抗生素耐药基因的细菌分离株中有 90%也携带有 int1 基因。在具有抗生素耐药性的大肠杆菌中,sul1、sul2、blaTEM 和 stra 基因的检出率分别为 14%、19%、0%和 31%。最后,与其他两种物种相比,平原斑马携带 AMR 的频率显著更高。

相似文献

1
COMPARING ANTIBIOTIC RESISTANCE IN FREE-RANGING VS. CAPTIVE AFRICAN WILD HERBIVORES.比较自由放养和圈养的非洲野生食草动物的抗生素耐药性。
J Wildl Dis. 2023 Apr 1;59(2):224-233. doi: 10.7589/JWD-D-21-00153.
2
Prevalence and characterization of antibiotic resistance genes and integrons in Escherichia coli isolates from captive non-human primates of 13 zoos in China.中国 13 家动物园圈养非人灵长类动物中大肠杆菌分离株的抗生素耐药基因和整合子的流行情况及特征。
Sci Total Environ. 2021 Dec 1;798:149268. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149268. Epub 2021 Jul 24.
3
Antimicrobial Resistance Patterns of Fecal Escherichia coli in Wildlife, Urban Wildlife, and Livestock in the Eastern Region of Sri Lanka, and Differences between Carnivores, Omnivores, and Herbivores.斯里兰卡东部地区野生动物、城市野生动物和家畜粪便中大肠杆菌的抗菌耐药模式,以及食肉动物、杂食动物和食草动物之间的差异。
J Wildl Dis. 2022 Apr 1;58(2):380-383. doi: 10.7589/JWD-D-21-00048.
4
Characterization of antimicrobial resistance profiles in Escherichia coli isolated from captive mammals in Ecuador.厄瓜多尔圈养哺乳动物分离出的大肠杆菌抗菌药物耐药性特征分析
Vet Med Sci. 2024 Jul;10(4):e1546. doi: 10.1002/vms3.1546.
5
Antibiotic-Resistant Escherichia coli and Class 1 Integrons in Humans, Domestic Animals, and Wild Primates in Rural Uganda.抗生素耐药大肠杆菌和 1 类整合子在乌干达农村的人类、家畜和野生灵长类动物中的情况。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2018 Oct 17;84(21). doi: 10.1128/AEM.01632-18. Print 2018 Nov 1.
6
MOLECULAR DETECTION OF ANTIBIOTIC-RESISTANCE DETERMINANTS IN ESCHERICHIA COLI ISOLATED FROM THE ENDANGERED AUSTRALIAN SEA LION (NEOPHOCA CINEREA).从濒危的澳大利亚海狮(新海狗属)中分离出的大肠杆菌抗生素耐药性决定因素的分子检测
J Wildl Dis. 2015 Jul;51(3):555-63. doi: 10.7589/2014-08-200. Epub 2015 Apr 28.
7
Strict relationship between class 1 integrons and resistance to sulfamethoxazole in Escherichia coli.肠杆菌科中 1 类整合子与磺胺甲恶唑耐药性之间的严格关系。
Microb Pathog. 2021 Dec;161(Pt A):105206. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2021.105206. Epub 2021 Oct 4.
8
Molecular assessment of antimicrobial resistance and virulence in multi drug resistant ESBL-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae from food fishes, Assam, India.印度阿萨姆邦食源性病原体中产 ESBL 耐药大肠埃希菌和肺炎克雷伯菌的耐药性和毒力的分子评估
Microb Pathog. 2020 Dec;149:104581. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2020.104581. Epub 2020 Oct 17.
9
Interspecies transmission of antimicrobial-resistant bacteria between wild birds and mammals in urban environment.城市环境中野生鸟类和哺乳动物之间的抗菌药物耐药菌的种间传播。
Vet Microbiol. 2024 Jul;294:110130. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2024.110130. Epub 2024 May 29.
10
Occurrence and Antimicrobial Resistance Traits of from Wild Birds and Rodents in Singapore.新加坡野生鸟类和啮齿动物中携带的情况和抗生素耐药性特征。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Aug 3;17(15):5606. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17155606.

引用本文的文献

1
Antimicrobial resistance in wild game mammals: a glimpse into the contamination of wild habitats in a systematic review and meta-analysis.野生哺乳动物的抗菌药物耐药性:系统评价与荟萃分析中对野生栖息地污染的一瞥
BMC Vet Res. 2025 Jan 11;21(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s12917-024-04462-5.
2
American crocodiles (: Reptilia: Crocodilidae) visiting the facilities of a freshwater aquaculture of the Northern Pacific region, Costa Rica, carry tetracycline-resistant .造访哥斯达黎加北太平洋地区淡水水产养殖设施的美洲鳄(: 爬行纲: 鳄科)携带耐四环素的…… (原文此处似乎不完整)
Front Vet Sci. 2024 Apr 5;11:1374677. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1374677. eCollection 2024.