Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2023 Jul;72:40-49. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2023.03.015. Epub 2023 Apr 17.
Antipsychotic-induced akathisia is severely distressing. We aimed to investigate relationships between antipsychotic doses and akathisia risk. We searched for randomised controlled trials that investigated monotherapy of 17 antipsychotics in adults with acute schizophrenia until 06 March 2022. The primary outcome was the number of participants with akathisia, which was analysed with odds ratios (ORs). We applied one-stage random-effects dose-response meta-analyses using restricted cubic splines to model the dose-response relationships. We included 98 studies (343 dose arms, 34,225 participants), most of which were short-term and had low-to-moderate risk of bias. We obtained data on all antipsychotics except clozapine and zotepine. In patients with acute exacerbations of chronic schizophrenia, from moderate to high certainty of evidence, our analysis showed that sertindole and quetiapine carried negligible risks for akathisia across examined doses (flat curves), while most of the other antipsychotics had their risks increase initially with increasing doses and then either plateaued (hyperbolic curves) or continued to rise (monotonic curves), with maximum ORs ranging from 1.76 with 95% Confidence Intervals [1.24, 2.52] for risperidone at 5.4 mg/day to OR 11.92 [5.18, 27.43] for lurasidone at 240 mg/day. We found limited or no data on akathisia risk in patients with predominant negative symptoms, first-episode schizophrenia, or elderly patients. In conclusion, liability of akathisia varies between antipsychotics and is dose-related. The dose-response curves for akathisia in most antipsychotics are either monotonic or hyperbolic, indicating that higher doses carry a greater or equal risk compared to lower doses.
抗精神病药引起的静坐不能令人深感痛苦。我们旨在研究抗精神病药剂量与静坐不能风险之间的关系。我们检索了截至 2022 年 3 月 6 日,评估 17 种抗精神病药单药治疗成人急性精神分裂症的随机对照试验。主要结局为静坐不能患者人数,采用比值比(OR)进行分析。我们采用一阶随机效应剂量-反应荟萃分析,使用限制立方样条对剂量-反应关系进行建模。我们纳入了 98 项研究(343 个剂量组,34225 名参与者),其中大部分为短期研究,且存在低到中度的偏倚风险。除氯氮平及佐替平外,我们获得了所有抗精神病药的数据。在慢性精神分裂症急性加重的患者中,我们的分析显示,从有中度到高度确定性证据表明,曲司氯铵和喹硫平在所有研究剂量下发生静坐不能的风险较低(平坦曲线),而其他大多数抗精神病药的风险最初随剂量增加而增加,然后要么稳定(双曲线),要么继续上升(单调曲线),最大 OR 范围从利培酮 5.4mg/天的 1.76 [95%置信区间(CI)1.24,2.52]到鲁拉西酮 240mg/天的 11.92 [5.18,27.43]。我们发现对于以阴性症状为主的患者、首发精神分裂症患者或老年患者的静坐不能风险数据有限或没有。总之,静坐不能的易感性在不同抗精神病药之间存在差异,且与剂量相关。大多数抗精神病药的静坐不能剂量-反应曲线要么是单调的,要么是双曲线的,这表明与低剂量相比,高剂量有更大或相等的风险。