Key Laboratory of Vector Biology and Pathogen Control of Zhejiang Province, College of Life Sciences, Huzhou University, Huzhou 313000, China; College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, Nanjing Agricultural University, Weigang, No. 1, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210095, China.
Institute of Maize and Featured Upland Crops, Zhejiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Dongyang 322100, China.
Sci Total Environ. 2023 Jul 10;881:163570. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.163570. Epub 2023 Apr 17.
No-tillage treatment, including no-tillage with straw retention (NTS) and without (NT), has been widely used as an efficient and sustainable alternative to conventional tillage with straw retention (CTS) and without (CT) and greatly affects soil physical quality and organic matter dynamics in cropland ecosystems. Although some studies have reported the effects of NTS on soil aggregate stability and soil organic carbon (SOC) concentration, the underlying mechanisms of how soil aggregates, aggregate-associated SOC and total nitrogen (TN) respond to no-tillage remain unclear. Through a global meta-analysis of 91 studies in cropland ecosystems, we evaluated the effects of no-tillage on soil aggregates and their associated SOC and TN concentrations. On average, no-tillage treatment significantly decreased the proportions of microaggregates (MA) by 21.4 % (95 % CI, -25.5 to -17.3 %) and silt+clay size particles (SIC) by 24.1 (95 % CI, -30.9 to -17.0 %), and increased the proportions of large macroaggregate (LA) by 49.5 % (95 % CI, 36.7-63.0 %) and small macroaggregate (SA) by 6.1 % (95 % CI, 2.0-10.9 %) compared to those in conventional tillage. The SOC concentrations for all three aggregate sizes increased significantly with no tillage: for LA by 28.2 % (95 % CI, 18.8-39.5 %), SA by 18.0 % (95 % CI, 12.8-23.3 %), and MA by 9.1 % (95 % CI, 2.6-16.8 %). TN also increased significantly for all sizes with no tillage, with LA by 13.6 % (95 % CI, 8.6-17.6 %), SA by 11.0 % (95 % CI, 5.0-17.0 %), MA by 11.7 % (95 % CI, 7.0-16.4 %), and SIC by 7.6 % (95 % CI, 2.4-13.8 %). The magnitude of the no-tillage treatment effect on soil aggregation, aggregate-associated SOC and TN varied with the environmental and experimental conditions. The positive effect on the proportions of LA occurred with initial soil organic matter (SOM) content >10 g kg, whereas SOM <10 g kg did not change significantly. Additionally, the effect size of NTS compared with CTS was lower than that of NT compared with CT. These findings suggest that NTS may promote physically protective SOC accumulation through the formation of macroaggregates by reducing disturbance destruction and increasing plant-derived binding agents. The findings highlight that no-tillage may enhance the formation of soil aggregates and the associated SOC and TN concentrations in global cropland ecosystems.
免耕处理,包括留茬免耕(NTS)和无留茬(NT),已被广泛用作替代传统留茬和无留茬(CTS 和 CT)的有效且可持续的方法,极大地影响了农田生态系统中的土壤物理质量和有机物质动态。尽管一些研究报告了 NTS 对土壤团聚体稳定性和土壤有机碳(SOC)浓度的影响,但土壤团聚体、团聚体相关 SOC 和总氮(TN)如何响应免耕的潜在机制仍不清楚。通过对农田生态系统中 91 项研究的全球荟萃分析,我们评估了免耕对土壤团聚体及其相关 SOC 和 TN 浓度的影响。平均而言,免耕处理使微团聚体(MA)的比例显著降低了 21.4%(95%置信区间,-25.5 至-17.3%),使粉粒和粘粒(SIC)的比例显著降低了 24.1%(95%置信区间,-30.9 至-17.0%),而大团聚体(LA)和小团聚体(SA)的比例分别显著增加了 49.5%(95%置信区间,36.7-63.0%)和 6.1%(95%置信区间,2.0-10.9%)。与传统耕作相比,所有三种团聚体大小的 SOC 浓度均显著增加:LA 增加了 28.2%(95%置信区间,18.8-39.5%),SA 增加了 18.0%(95%置信区间,12.8-23.3%),MA 增加了 9.1%(95%置信区间,2.6-16.8%)。所有尺寸的 TN 也随免耕显著增加,LA 增加了 13.6%(95%置信区间,8.6-17.6%),SA 增加了 11.0%(95%置信区间,5.0-17.0%),MA 增加了 11.7%(95%置信区间,7.0-16.4%),SIC 增加了 7.6%(95%置信区间,2.4-13.8%)。免耕处理对土壤团聚体、团聚体相关 SOC 和 TN 的影响程度随环境和实验条件而变化。LA 比例的正效应发生在初始土壤有机质(SOM)含量>10 g kg 时,而 SOM<10 g kg 时则没有显著变化。此外,NTS 与 CTS 相比的效应大小低于 NT 与 CT 相比的效应大小。这些发现表明,NTS 可能通过减少干扰破坏和增加植物衍生的结合剂来促进物理保护性 SOC 积累,从而促进大团聚体的形成。这些发现强调了免耕可能会增强全球农田生态系统中土壤团聚体的形成及其相关 SOC 和 TN 浓度。