Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Department of Medicine, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
BMJ Open. 2023 Apr 19;13(4):e065306. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065306.
This study aimed to: (1) examine the experience of nine global jurisdictions that engaged primary care providers (PCPs) to administer COVID-19 vaccines during the pandemic; (2) describe how vaccine hesitancy and principles of equity were incorporated in the COVID-19 vaccine roll-out strategies and (3) identify the barriers and facilitators to the vaccine roll-out.
Rapid scoping review.
Searches took place in MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, the Cochrane Library, SCOPUS and PsycINFO, Google, and the websites of national health departments. Searches and analyses took place from May 2021 to July 2021.
Sixty-two documents met the inclusion criteria (35=grey literature; 56% and 27=peer reviewed; 44%). This review found that the vaccine distribution approach started at hospitals in almost all jurisdictions. In some jurisdictions, PCPs were engaged at the beginning, and the majority included PCPs over time. In many jurisdictions, equity was considered in the prioritisation policies for various marginalised communities. However, vaccine hesitancy was not explicitly considered in the design of vaccine distribution approaches. The barriers to the roll-out of vaccines included personal, organisational and contextual factors. The vaccine roll-out strategy was facilitated by establishing policies and processes for pandemic preparedness, well-established and coordinated information systems, primary care interventions, adequate supply of providers, education and training of providers, and effective communications strategy.
Empirical evidence is lacking on the impact of a primary care-led vaccine distribution approach on vaccine hesitancy, adoption and equity. Future vaccine distribution approaches need to be informed by further research evaluating vaccine distribution approaches and their impact on patient and population outcomes.
本研究旨在:(1) 研究 9 个全球司法管辖区的经验,这些地区在大流行期间让初级保健提供者 (PCP) 来管理 COVID-19 疫苗;(2) 描述疫苗犹豫和公平原则如何纳入 COVID-19 疫苗推出策略;(3) 确定疫苗推出的障碍和促进因素。
快速范围审查。
在 MEDLINE、CINAHL、Embase、Cochrane 图书馆、SCOPUS 和 PsycINFO、Google 以及国家卫生部门的网站上进行了搜索。搜索和分析于 2021 年 5 月至 2021 年 7 月进行。
62 篇文献符合纳入标准(35 篇=灰色文献;56%和 27 篇=同行评审;44%)。本综述发现,疫苗分配方法几乎在所有司法管辖区都从医院开始。在一些司法管辖区,一开始就聘请了 PCP,并且随着时间的推移,大多数司法管辖区都包括了 PCP。在许多司法管辖区,在为各种边缘化社区制定优先政策时考虑了公平性。然而,在设计疫苗分配方法时并没有明确考虑疫苗犹豫。疫苗推出的障碍包括个人、组织和背景因素。疫苗推出策略的促进因素包括为大流行做好准备的政策和流程、完善和协调的信息系统、初级保健干预、提供者的充足供应、提供者的教育和培训,以及有效的沟通策略。
缺乏关于初级保健主导的疫苗分配方法对疫苗犹豫、采用和公平性影响的实证证据。未来的疫苗分配方法需要进一步研究来评估疫苗分配方法及其对患者和人群结果的影响。