• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

修订和验证中文版大学生亲社会倾向量表(PSA)。

Revision and validation of the prosocialness scale for adults (PSA) among chinese college students.

机构信息

School of Education, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China.

Institute of Psychology, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China.

出版信息

BMC Psychol. 2023 Apr 19;11(1):124. doi: 10.1186/s40359-023-01124-3.

DOI:10.1186/s40359-023-01124-3
PMID:37076892
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10114401/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although prosocial behavior plays an important role in the development of individuals, there are few prosocial measurements for college students. This study examines the applicability of the Prosocialness Scale for Adults to a sample of Chinese college students and provides a measurement tool for prosocial behavior among Chinese college students.

METHODS

Three sub-studies were conducted in this study to revise the Prosocialness Scale for Adults (PSA) and verify its applicability in Chinese college students. In Study 1, the translated Prosocialness Scale for Adults (PSA) was used to test (N = 436). In Study 2, confirmatory factor analysis was carried out (N = 576). The Scale of School Adjustment for College Students, the Scale of Regulatory Emotional Self-Efficacy, the Prosocial Tendencies Measure, and the Chinese Big Five Personality Inventory were used to test the concurrent validity. And the internal consistency reliability of the scale was tested. In Study 3, the test-retest reliability of the scale was tested 4 weeks after the completion of Study 2.

RESULTS

The results show that the scale has a good single-factor structure (χ2/df = 4.180, CFI = 0.936, TLI = 0.922, GFI = 0.937, IFI = 0.937, NFI = 0.919, AGFI = 0.907, RMSEA = 0.074, SRMR = 0.042). The total score was positively correlated with the scores of the Scale of Regulatory Emotional Self-Efficacy (r = 0.394, p < 0.001), the Scale of School Adjustment for College Students (r = 0.429, p < 0.001), the Chinese Big Five Personality Inventory (r = 0.456, p < 0.001) ,and the Prosocial Tendencies Measure (r = 0.619, p < 0.001). The internal consistency reliability was robust (α = 0.890) and the test-retest reliability was 0.801.

CONCLUSION

These studies show that the Chinese version of the Prosocialness Scale for Adults (PSA) has good reliability and validity and can be used to measure the prosocial behavior of Chinese college students.

摘要

背景

尽管亲社会行为在个体发展中起着重要作用,但针对大学生的亲社会行为测量工具却很少。本研究旨在检验成人亲社会量表(PSA)在中国大学生样本中的适用性,并为中国大学生的亲社会行为提供一种测量工具。

方法

本研究共进行了三项子研究,以修订成人亲社会量表(PSA)并验证其在中国大学生中的适用性。在研究 1 中,使用翻译后的成人亲社会量表(PSA)对 436 名被试进行测试。在研究 2 中,进行了验证性因素分析(N=576)。同时使用大学生学校适应量表、情绪调节自我效能感量表、亲社会倾向量表和中国大五人格量表来检验量表的同时效度,并检验了量表的内部一致性信度。在研究 3 中,在完成研究 2 4 周后,对量表进行了重测信度检验。

结果

结果表明,该量表具有良好的单因素结构(χ2/df=4.180,CFI=0.936,TLI=0.922,GFI=0.937,IFI=0.937,NFI=0.919,AGFI=0.907,RMSEA=0.074,SRMR=0.042)。总量表与情绪调节自我效能感量表(r=0.394,p<0.001)、大学生学校适应量表(r=0.429,p<0.001)、中国大五人格量表(r=0.456,p<0.001)和亲社会倾向量表(r=0.619,p<0.001)得分呈正相关。量表的内部一致性信度较高(α=0.890),重测信度为 0.801。

结论

这些研究表明,成人亲社会量表(PSA)中文版具有良好的信度和效度,可用于测量中国大学生的亲社会行为。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0eca/10114401/a64eb54c0438/40359_2023_1124_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0eca/10114401/a64eb54c0438/40359_2023_1124_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0eca/10114401/a64eb54c0438/40359_2023_1124_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Revision and validation of the prosocialness scale for adults (PSA) among chinese college students.修订和验证中文版大学生亲社会倾向量表(PSA)。
BMC Psychol. 2023 Apr 19;11(1):124. doi: 10.1186/s40359-023-01124-3.
2
Reliability and validity of the short version of the childhood abuse self report scale in Chinese college students.中文版儿童虐待自我报告量表短式的信度和效度。
BMC Psychol. 2024 May 8;12(1):256. doi: 10.1186/s40359-024-01734-5.
3
[Reliability and validity of Meaningful Life Measure-Chinese Revised in Chinese college students].[中文版大学生有意义生活量表的信效度研究]
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 2016 Apr 20;37(4):499-504. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-4254.2017.04.13.
4
Development of Chinese college students' perception teacher differential behavior scale and its reliability and validity test.发展中国大学生感知教师差异化行为量表及其信度和效度检验。
BMC Psychol. 2024 Sep 12;12(1):482. doi: 10.1186/s40359-024-01973-6.
5
Translation and psychometric evaluation of Smartphone Addiction Scale-Short Version (SAS-SV) among Chinese college students.中文大学生智能手机成瘾量表短版(SAS-SV)的翻译与心理计量学评估。
PLoS One. 2022 Nov 29;17(11):e0278092. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278092. eCollection 2022.
6
Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the achievement emotions questionnaire for physical education in university students.大学生体育成就情绪问卷中文版的信度和效度。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Sep 21;23(1):1839. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16759-5.
7
Social functioning in Chinese college students with and without schizotypal personality traits: an exploratory study of the Chinese version of the First Episode Social Functioning Scale.中文大学生中具有和不具有精神分裂型人格特质者的社会功能:《首次发作社会功能量表》中文版的一项探索性研究。
PLoS One. 2013 May 14;8(5):e61115. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0061115. Print 2013.
8
Measuring self-as-context in Chinese college students: Validity and reliability of the Chinese version of self-as-context scale (C-SACS).测量中国大学生的自我即情境:中文版自我即情境量表(C-SACS)的效度和信度
Front Psychol. 2022 Dec 6;13:1051661. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1051661. eCollection 2022.
9
The future disposition Inventory-24: reliability and validity estimates in a large sample of Chinese University students.未来处置问卷-24:在一大群中国大学生样本中的信度和效度估计。
BMC Psychiatry. 2018 Sep 17;18(1):299. doi: 10.1186/s12888-018-1875-8.
10
Personality inventory for DSM-5 brief form(PID-5-BF) in Chinese students and patients: evaluating the five-factor model and a culturally informed six-factor model.中文学生和患者的 DSM-5 简短形式人格量表(PID-5-BF):评估五因素模型和具有文化意义的六因素模型。
BMC Psychiatry. 2021 Feb 17;21(1):107. doi: 10.1186/s12888-021-03080-x.

引用本文的文献

1
The relationship between social support and professional identity of health professional students from a two-way social support theory perspective: chain mediating effects of achievement motivation and meaning in life.从双向社会支持理论角度看医学生的社会支持与专业认同的关系:成就动机和生活意义的链式中介效应。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Apr 29;24(1):473. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05391-5.

本文引用的文献

1
Avoiding antisocial behavior among adolescents: The positive influence of classmates' prosocial behavior.避免青少年的反社会行为:同学亲社会行为的积极影响。
J Adolesc. 2018 Oct;68:136-145. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2018.07.013. Epub 2018 Aug 1.
2
Metric Goodness of the Adult Prosocialness Scale. Comparative Study of Italy and Spain.成人亲社会量表的度量效度。意大利与西班牙的比较研究。
Span J Psychol. 2018 Jul 30;21:E29. doi: 10.1017/sjp.2018.26.
3
Prosocial behavior and childhood trajectories of internalizing and externalizing problems: The role of neighborhood and school contexts.
亲社会行为与内化和外化问题的儿童发展轨迹:邻里和学校环境的作用。
Dev Psychol. 2016 Feb;52(2):253-258. doi: 10.1037/dev0000076.
4
Gender Differences in Patterns of Association Between Prosocial Behavior, Personality, and Externalizing Problems.亲社会行为、人格与外化问题之间关联模式的性别差异。
J Res Pers. 2008 Apr;42(2):472-481. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2007.06.003.
5
Prosocial behavior: multilevel perspectives.亲社会行为:多层次视角
Annu Rev Psychol. 2005;56:365-92. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070141.
6
Pathways to self-esteem in late adolescence: the role of parent and peer attachment, empathy, and social behaviours.青春期后期自尊形成的途径:父母和同伴依恋、同理心及社会行为的作用。
J Adolesc. 2004 Dec;27(6):703-16. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2004.05.005.
7
The relationship between personality and discretionary helping behaviors.个性与自主助人行为之间的关系。
Psychol Rep. 2004 Aug;95(1):355-65. doi: 10.2466/pr0.95.1.355-365.