Central Michigan University, College of Medicine, Mt. Pleasant, MI, United States.
Central Michigan University Medical Education Partners, Saginaw, MI, United States.
Front Public Health. 2023 Apr 3;11:1144659. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1144659. eCollection 2023.
Mass vaccination serves as an effective strategy to combat the COVID-19 pandemic. Vaccine hesitancy is a recognized impediment to achieving a vaccination rate necessary to protect communities. However, solutions and interventions to address this issue are limited by a lack of prior research.
Over 200 patients from 18 Michigan counties participated in this study. Each participant received an initial survey, including demographical questions and knowledge and opinion questions regarding COVID-19 and vaccines. Participants were randomly assigned an educational intervention in either video or infographic format. Patients received a post-survey to assess changes in knowledge and attitudes. Paired sample -tests and ANOVA were used to measure the effectiveness of the educational interventions. Participants also elected to complete a 3-month follow-up survey.
Patients showed increased knowledge after the educational intervention in six out of seven COVID-19 topics (). There was increased vaccine acceptance after the intervention but no difference in the effectiveness between the two intervention modalities. Post-intervention, more patients believed in CDC recommendations (), trusted the vaccine (), believed the vaccines had adequate testing (), recognized prior mistreatment in the medical care system (), agreed that a source they trust told them to receive a vaccine (), and were worried about taking time off of work to get a vaccine (). Additionally, post-intervention, patients were less concerned about mild reactions of the virus (), the rapid development of the vaccines (), and vaccine side effects (). Data demonstrated that attitude and knowledge improved when comparing pre-educational intervention to follow-up but decreased from post-intervention to follow-up.
The findings illustrate that educational interventions improved COVID-19 and vaccine knowledge among patients and that the knowledge was retained. Educational interventions serve as powerful tools to increase knowledge within communities and address negative views on vaccination. Interventions should be continually utilized to reinforce information within communities to improve vaccination rates.
大规模疫苗接种是应对 COVID-19 大流行的有效策略。疫苗犹豫是实现保护社区所需接种率的公认障碍。然而,由于缺乏前期研究,解决这一问题的解决方案和干预措施有限。
本研究纳入了来自密歇根州 18 个县的 200 多名患者。每位参与者都接受了初始调查,包括人口统计学问题以及关于 COVID-19 和疫苗的知识和意见问题。参与者被随机分配接受视频或信息图格式的教育干预。患者接受了后续调查,以评估知识和态度的变化。采用配对样本 t 检验和方差分析来衡量教育干预的效果。参与者还选择完成为期 3 个月的随访调查。
在 COVID-19 的七个主题中的六个主题中,患者在接受教育干预后知识有所增加()。干预后疫苗接种率有所提高,但两种干预方式的效果没有差异。干预后,更多的患者相信疾病预防控制中心的建议(),信任疫苗(),认为疫苗经过了充分的测试(),认识到医疗保健系统中存在先前的虐待行为(),同意他们信任的消息来源告诉他们接种疫苗(),并担心请假去接种疫苗()。此外,干预后,患者对病毒的轻微反应()、疫苗的快速开发()和疫苗副作用()的担忧减少了。数据表明,与教育干预前相比,教育干预后的态度和知识有所提高,但与教育干预后相比,随访时又有所下降。
研究结果表明,教育干预提高了患者对 COVID-19 和疫苗的知识,并且知识得到了保留。教育干预是提高社区知识水平和解决对疫苗接种负面看法的有力工具。应持续利用干预措施来加强社区内的信息,以提高疫苗接种率。