Suppr超能文献

急性淋巴细胞白血病患者同时使用L-天冬酰胺酶和含L-天冬氨酸的全胃肠外营养的临床影响。

Clinical impacts of the concomitant use of L-asparaginase and total parenteral nutrition containing L-aspartic acid in patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

作者信息

Ko Minoh, Kim Myeong Gyu, Yoon Sung-Soo, Kim In-Wha, Suh Sung Yun, Cho Yoon-Sook, Oh Jung Mi

机构信息

College of Pharmacy and Research Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Department of Pharmacy, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Front Nutr. 2023 Apr 3;10:1122010. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2023.1122010. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

L-asparaginase (ASNase) depletes L-asparagine and causes the death of leukemic cells, making it a mainstay for the treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). However, ASNase's activity can be inhibited by L-aspartic acid (Asp), which competes for the same substrate and reduces the drug's efficacy. While many commercially used total parenteral nutrition (TPN) products contain Asp, it is unclear how the concomitant use of TPNs containing Asp (Asp-TPN) affects ALL patients treated with ASNase. This propensity-matched retrospective cohort study evaluated the clinical effects of the interaction between ASNase and Asp-TPN.

METHODS

The study population included newly diagnosed adult Korean ALL patients who received VPDL induction therapy consisting of vincristine, prednisolone, daunorubicin, and L-asparaginase between 2004 and 2021. Patients were divided into two groups based on their exposure to Asp-TPN: (1) Asp-TPN group and (2) control group. Data, including baseline characteristics, disease information, medication information, and laboratory data, were collected retrospectively. The primary outcomes for the effectiveness were overall and complete response rates. Relapse-free survival at six months and one year of treatment were also evaluated. The safety of both TPN and ASNase was evaluated by comparing liver function test levels between groups. A 1:1 propensity score matching analysis was conducted to minimize potential selection bias.

RESULTS

The analysis included a total of 112 ALL patients, and 34 of whom received Asp-TPN and ASNase concomitantly. After propensity score matching, 30 patients remained in each group. The concomitant use of Asp-TPN and ASNase did not affect the overall response rate (odds ratio [OR] 0.53; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.17-1.62) or the complete response rate (OR 0.86; 95% CI = 0.29-2.59) of the ASNase-including induction therapy. The concomitant use of Asp-TPN and ASNase also did not impact relapse-free survival (RFS) at six months and one year of treatment (OR 1.00; 95% CI = 0.36-2.78 and OR 1.24; 95% CI, 0.50-3.12, respectively). The peak levels of each liver function test (LFT) and the frequency of LFT elevations were evaluated during induction therapy and showed no difference between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

There is no clear rationale for avoiding Asp-TPN in ASNase-treated patients.

摘要

引言

L-天冬酰胺酶(ASNase)可消耗L-天冬酰胺并导致白血病细胞死亡,使其成为治疗急性淋巴细胞白血病(ALL)的主要药物。然而,ASNase的活性可被L-天冬氨酸(Asp)抑制,Asp会竞争相同底物并降低药物疗效。虽然许多商业使用的全胃肠外营养(TPN)产品都含有Asp,但尚不清楚同时使用含Asp的TPN(Asp-TPN)对接受ASNase治疗的ALL患者有何影响。这项倾向匹配的回顾性队列研究评估了ASNase与Asp-TPN相互作用的临床效果。

方法

研究人群包括2004年至2021年间新诊断的成年韩国ALL患者,这些患者接受了由长春新碱、泼尼松龙、柔红霉素和L-天冬酰胺酶组成的VPDL诱导治疗。根据患者是否接触Asp-TPN将其分为两组:(1)Asp-TPN组和(2)对照组。回顾性收集包括基线特征、疾病信息、用药信息和实验室数据在内的数据。有效性的主要结局是总缓解率和完全缓解率。还评估了治疗6个月和1年时的无复发生存率。通过比较两组的肝功能测试水平来评估TPN和ASNase的安全性。进行1:1倾向评分匹配分析以尽量减少潜在的选择偏倚。

结果

分析共纳入112例ALL患者,其中34例同时接受了Asp-TPN和ASNase治疗。经过倾向评分匹配后,每组各有30例患者。同时使用Asp-TPN和ASNase并不影响含ASNase的诱导治疗的总缓解率(优势比[OR]0.53;95%置信区间[CI]=0.17-1.62)或完全缓解率(OR 0.86;95%CI=0.29-2.59)。同时使用Asp-TPN和ASNase也不影响治疗6个月和1年时的无复发生存率(RFS)(OR分别为1.00;95%CI=0.36-2.78和OR 1.24;95%CI,0.50-3.12)。在诱导治疗期间评估了各项肝功能测试(LFT)的峰值水平和LFT升高的频率,两组之间无差异。

结论

对于接受ASNase治疗的患者,没有明确的理由避免使用Asp-TPN。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c74c/10106764/1d115b809b3b/fnut-10-1122010-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验