Juraś Małgorzata J
Institute of Psychology, University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland.
Postep Psychiatr Neurol. 2022 Jun;31(2):62-68. doi: 10.5114/ppn.2022.118131. Epub 2022 Jul 20.
This review discusses the assessment of psychotic disorders in prelingually deaf patients and the related challenges.
Although prelingually deaf patients are often diagnosed with psychotic disorders, the clinical presentation of this group is complex and no clear guidelines regarding the assessment process can be formulated due to the lack of valid, reliable research. Sign language dynamics or language dysfluency may be falsely recognized as disorganized thinking. Some of the symptoms indicating disorganized thinking in the case of spoken languages may fulfill specific functions when used in sign language (for example object chaining). Furthermore, deaf individuals experience multiple stressors that may be considered as risk factors for developing delusions, especially for those growing up in hearing, non-signing families. Nevertheless, it is important to acknowledge that some seemingly delusional beliefs shared by prelingually deaf people may be associated with the lack of assisted learning, gullibility, low level of confidence in healthcare or deaf communities' social norms. The question concerning the sensory modality of hallucinations experienced by deaf individuals remains unresolved. Patients' accounts suggest that hallucinations described as auditory may be perceived as lip-reading without identifying the speaker's face, among others. However, for those who provide help it is far more important to recognize the function of hallucinations and to differentiate them from normative experience.
It is essential to expand our knowledge regarding the clinical presentation of psychotic disorders in deaf individuals in order to develop assessment guidelines and tools and, above all, increase the well-being of those suffering from psychotic disorders, as well as of those whose diagnosis remains unclear.
本综述探讨了先天性失聪患者精神障碍的评估及相关挑战。
尽管先天性失聪患者常被诊断为精神障碍,但该群体的临床表现复杂,由于缺乏有效、可靠的研究,无法制定关于评估过程的明确指南。手语动态或语言不流畅可能被错误地识别为思维紊乱。在口语中表明思维紊乱的一些症状,在使用手语时可能具有特定功能(例如物体串联)。此外,失聪个体经历多种应激源,这些应激源可能被视为产生妄想的风险因素,尤其是对于那些在听力正常、不使用手语的家庭中成长的人。然而,必须认识到,先天性失聪者共有的一些看似妄想的信念可能与缺乏辅助学习、易受骗、对医疗保健或聋人社区社会规范的信心水平低有关。关于失聪个体所经历幻觉的感觉模态问题仍未解决。患者的描述表明,被描述为听觉的幻觉可能被视为在未识别说话者面部的情况下进行唇读等。然而,对于提供帮助的人来说,更重要的是认识幻觉的功能并将其与正常体验区分开来。
有必要扩展我们对失聪个体精神障碍临床表现的认识,以便制定评估指南和工具,最重要的是,提高患有精神障碍者以及诊断仍不明确者的幸福感。