• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

希伯来文版国际脊髓损伤活动和参与基本数据集的信度和效度。

Reliability and validity of the Hebrew version of the International Spinal Cord Injury Activities and Participation Basic Data Set.

机构信息

Sheba Medical Center, Department of Neurological Rehabilitation, Ramat Gan, Israel -

Sackler Faculty of Medicine, University of Tel Aviv, Tel Aviv, Israel -

出版信息

Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2023 Jun;59(3):345-352. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.23.07761-4. Epub 2023 Apr 21.

DOI:10.23736/S1973-9087.23.07761-4
PMID:37083099
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10266406/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The International Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) Activities and Participation Basic Data Set (APBDS) was created to facilitate comparisons of levels of function and disability in SCI individuals worldwide.

AIM

Evaluating the reliability and validity of the APBDS's Hebrew translation was our goal.

DESIGN

Observational, cross-sectional study.

SETTING

University and Outpatient Rehabilitation Department of a Medical Center.

POPULATION

Individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI).

METHODS

The APBDS's Hebrew version was administered to fifty individuals with SCI. Reliability was evaluated through Cronbach Alpha Test and a test-retest method. Validity was determined by testing for convergence with the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Scale (WHODAS) 2.0 and the Medical Outcomes Short Form Health Survey (SF-12).

RESULTS

The Hebrew APBDS had a high test-retest reliability (ICC=0.792) and an adequate Cronbach alpha test (α=0.792). Significant convergent validity was partial with both the WHODAS 2.0 (strong in the self-care objective (r=-0.648) and subjective (r=-0.666), moderate in the total objective (r=-0.640) and subjective (r=-0.570) domains of the APBDS) and the SF-12 (moderate between the total objective domain and the Physical composite score (r=0.378), poor with the Mental composite score (r=0.310)).

CONCLUSIONS

Although the Hebrew APBDS's moderate reliability and validity warrants further research, it opens new vistas regarding assessment of SCI individuals' satisfaction, activity, and participation.

CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT

We feel that this data set may be used in the long-term follow-up of SCI individuals in the Sheba SCI rehabilitation registry.

摘要

背景

国际脊髓损伤(SCI)活动和参与基本数据集(APBDS)旨在促进全球范围内 SCI 个体功能和残疾水平的比较。

目的

评估 APBDS 的希伯来语翻译的信度和效度是我们的目标。

设计

观察性、横断面研究。

地点

大学和医疗中心的门诊康复部门。

人群

脊髓损伤(SCI)个体。

方法

向 50 名 SCI 个体施测 APBDS 的希伯来语版本。通过 Cronbach Alpha 测试和重测法评估信度。通过与世界卫生组织残疾评估量表(WHODAS)2.0 和医疗结果短式健康调查(SF-12)的收敛性测试来确定效度。

结果

希伯来语 APBDS 具有较高的重测信度(ICC=0.792)和适当的 Cronbach Alpha 测试(α=0.792)。与 WHODAS 2.0 具有部分显著的收敛效度(在自我护理目标方面较强,与 APBDS 的主观评分相关度为 0.666,客观评分相关度为 0.648;在总目标和主观评分方面中度相关,与 APBDS 的客观评分相关度为 0.640,主观评分相关度为 0.570),与 SF-12 具有中度的相关性(在总目标方面与身体成分评分相关度为 0.378,在精神成分评分方面相关性较差,相关度为 0.310)。

结论

尽管希伯来语 APBDS 的信度和效度中等,但仍需要进一步研究,它为评估 SCI 个体的满意度、活动和参与度开辟了新的视野。

临床康复影响

我们认为,这个数据集可以在 Sheba SCI 康复登记处对 SCI 个体进行长期随访时使用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/14db/10266406/e9595fbb7a86/7761-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/14db/10266406/e9595fbb7a86/7761-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/14db/10266406/e9595fbb7a86/7761-f1.jpg

相似文献

1
Reliability and validity of the Hebrew version of the International Spinal Cord Injury Activities and Participation Basic Data Set.希伯来文版国际脊髓损伤活动和参与基本数据集的信度和效度。
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2023 Jun;59(3):345-352. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.23.07761-4. Epub 2023 Apr 21.
2
Comparison of the Utrecht Scale for Evaluation of Rehabilitation-Participation with the ICF Measure of Participation and Activities Screener and the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule II in persons with spinal cord injury.与 ICF 参与和活动筛查量表以及 WHO 残疾评估量表 II 相比,评估康复参与的乌得勒支量表在脊髓损伤患者中的应用比较。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014 Jan;95(1):87-93. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.08.236. Epub 2013 Sep 2.
3
Cross-cultural adaptation of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) for Hebrew-speaking subjects with and without hand injury.世界卫生组织残疾评定量表2.0(WHODAS 2.0)在有手部损伤和无手部损伤的希伯来语使用者中的跨文化调适
Disabil Rehabil. 2017 Jun;39(12):1155-1161. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2016.1189606. Epub 2016 Jun 13.
4
Cultural adaptation and Turkish version of Physical Activity Scale for Individuals with Physical Disabilities in individuals with spinal cord injury: a reliability and validity study.脊髓损伤个体中身体残疾者身体活动量表的文化适应及土耳其语版本:一项信效度研究
Disabil Rehabil. 2022 Oct;44(21):6414-6423. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2021.1964624. Epub 2021 Aug 20.
5
The World Health Organization Disability Assessment Scale, WHODAS II: reliability and validity in the measurement of activity and participation in a spinal cord injury population.世界卫生组织残疾评定量表第二版(WHODAS II):在脊髓损伤人群中测量活动和参与的信度和效度。
J Rehabil Med. 2012 Sep;44(9):747-55. doi: 10.2340/16501977-1016.
6
Psychometric Properties of the Spinal Cord Injury-Quality of Life (SCI-QOL) Resilience Short Form in a Sample With Spinal Cord Injury.脊髓损伤生活质量(SCI-QOL)弹性简短量表在脊髓损伤样本中的心理测量特性。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2024 Jan;105(1):59-66. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2023.10.002. Epub 2023 Oct 20.
7
The reliability and validity of the International Spinal Cord Injury Quality of Life Basic Data set in people with spinal cord injuries from a middle-income country: a psychometric study of the Thai version.来自中等收入国家的脊髓损伤患者使用国际脊髓损伤生活质量基本数据集的信度和效度:泰国版的心理测量研究。
Spinal Cord. 2020 Sep;58(9):1015-1021. doi: 10.1038/s41393-020-0468-9. Epub 2020 Apr 28.
8
Reliability and validity of the Persian version of the spinal cord injury lifestyle scale and the health behavior questionnaire in persons with spinal cord injury.脊髓损伤生活方式量表波斯语版及脊髓损伤患者健康行为问卷的信效度研究
Spinal Cord. 2018 May;56(5):509-515. doi: 10.1038/s41393-017-0056-9. Epub 2018 Jan 16.
9
Activities and participation after stroke: validity and reliability of the Turkish version of IMPACT-S questionnaire.脑卒中后活动和参与:土耳其版 IMPACT-S 问卷的效度和信度。
Disabil Rehabil. 2020 Jun;42(13):1912-1917. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2018.1542038. Epub 2019 Jan 17.
10
Development and assessment of a community follow-up questionnaire for the Rick Hansen spinal cord injury registry.开发和评估里克·汉森脊髓损伤登记处的社区随访问卷。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013 Sep;94(9):1753-65. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.03.006. Epub 2013 Mar 22.

本文引用的文献

1
Repeatability and Reliability of the Rheumatoid Arthritis Foot Disease Activity Index in Spanish Patients: A Transcultural Adaptation.西班牙患者类风湿关节炎足部疾病活动指数的重复性和可靠性:一项跨文化适应性研究
Biology (Basel). 2021 Dec 26;11(1):30. doi: 10.3390/biology11010030.
2
Repeatability and reliability of the diabetic foot self-care questionnaire in Arabic patients: A transcultural adaptation.阿拉伯语糖尿病足自我护理问卷的可重复性和可靠性:跨文化调适。
J Tissue Viability. 2022 Feb;31(1):62-68. doi: 10.1016/j.jtv.2021.06.007. Epub 2021 Jun 18.
3
Impact of survey length and compensation on validity, reliability, and sample characteristics for Ultrashort-, Short-, and Long-Research Participant Perception Surveys.
超短、短和长研究参与者感知调查问卷的长度和报酬对有效性、可靠性及样本特征的影响。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2018 Feb;2(1):31-37. doi: 10.1017/cts.2018.18. Epub 2018 Jul 6.
4
Health Conditions: Effect on Function, Health-Related Quality of Life, and Life Satisfaction After Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury. A Prospective Observational Registry Cohort Study.健康状况:对创伤性脊髓损伤后功能、健康相关生活质量和生活满意度的影响。一项前瞻性观察性登记队列研究。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018 Mar;99(3):443-451. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.06.012. Epub 2017 Jul 19.
5
Guidelines for developing, translating, and validating a questionnaire in perioperative and pain medicine.围手术期与疼痛医学领域问卷的开发、翻译及验证指南。
Saudi J Anaesth. 2017 May;11(Suppl 1):S80-S89. doi: 10.4103/sja.SJA_203_17.
6
People with Spinal Cord Injury in Israel.以色列的脊髓损伤患者。
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2017 Feb;96(2 Suppl 1):S78-S79. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000000580.
7
Making sense of Cronbach's alpha.理解克朗巴哈系数。
Int J Med Educ. 2011 Jun 27;2:53-55. doi: 10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd.
8
Classifications In Brief: American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Impairment Scale.简要分类:美国脊髓损伤协会(ASIA)损伤分级量表
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 May;475(5):1499-1504. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-5133-4. Epub 2016 Nov 4.
9
Standardization of Data for Clinical Use and Research in Spinal Cord Injury.脊髓损伤临床应用与研究的数据标准化
Brain Sci. 2016 Aug 12;6(3):29. doi: 10.3390/brainsci6030029.
10
Cross-cultural adaptation of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) for Hebrew-speaking subjects with and without hand injury.世界卫生组织残疾评定量表2.0(WHODAS 2.0)在有手部损伤和无手部损伤的希伯来语使用者中的跨文化调适
Disabil Rehabil. 2017 Jun;39(12):1155-1161. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2016.1189606. Epub 2016 Jun 13.