Yang Tingting, Hu Rongsheng, Tian Wen, Lin Ying, Lu Yamei, Liang Xiaolin, Zheng Danying, Zhang Xinyu
Department of Ophthalmology, First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
Department of Ophthalmology, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Qingyuan People's Hospital, Qingyuan, China.
J Ophthalmol. 2023 Apr 8;2023:7437935. doi: 10.1155/2023/7437935. eCollection 2023.
To compare eye-related quality of life between Chinese children wearing orthokeratology (OK) contact lenses and single-vision spectacles (SVS) using the Pediatric Eye Questionnaire (PedEyeQ) and to evaluate the impact of different myopia correction methods on children and their parents.
Children aged 12-17 years and their parents/legal guardians were recruited. The children's myopia ranged from -0.50 to -5.00 diopters (D), and their astigmatism was <1.50 D. They had all been wearing OK contact lenses or SVS for at least 12 months. The children completed the Child PedEyeQ. One of their parents (or a legal guardian) completed the Proxy PedEyeQ and the Parent PedEyeQ. Rasch-calibrated PedEyeQ scores were calculated for each domain and were converted to a scale from 0 to 100 for statistical analysis.
A total of 50 children wearing OK contact lenses, 43 children wearing SVS, and their parents/legal guardians completed the questionnaires. The scores of all Child, Proxy, and Parent PedEyeQ domains in the OK contact lens group were higher than those in the SVS group (all < 0.05). In the mild and moderate myopia subgroups, the Child, Proxy, and Parent PedEyeQ scores in the mild myopia OK contact lens subgroup were higher than those in the mild myopia SVS group (all < 0.05) except functional vision and bothered by eyes/vision domains for the proxy PedEyeQ. Similarly, the Child, Proxy, and Parent PedEyeQ scores in the moderate myopia OK contact lens subgroup were higher than those in the moderate myopia SVS subgroup (all < 0.05) except impact on parent and family domain for the parent PedEyeQ. In the subgroup analysis of glasses type, no significant score difference of any Child, Proxy, and Parent PedEyeQ domain was detected between mild and moderate myopia in either the OK contact lens group or the SVS group (all > 0.05).
Compared with children wearing SVS, children wearing OK contact lenses have better functional vision and eye-related quality of life. Moreover, OK contact lens has a better correction effect, higher acceptance rates, and less impact on parents and families than SVS.
使用儿童眼用问卷(PedEyeQ)比较佩戴角膜塑形术(OK)隐形眼镜和单焦点眼镜(SVS)的中国儿童的眼相关生活质量,并评估不同近视矫正方法对儿童及其父母的影响。
招募12至17岁的儿童及其父母/法定监护人。儿童近视度数在-0.50至-5.00屈光度(D)之间,散光小于1.50 D。他们均佩戴OK隐形眼镜或SVS至少12个月。儿童完成儿童PedEyeQ问卷。其父母之一(或法定监护人)完成代理PedEyeQ问卷和家长PedEyeQ问卷。计算每个领域经拉施校准的PedEyeQ分数,并转换为0至100的量表进行统计分析。
共有50名佩戴OK隐形眼镜的儿童、43名佩戴SVS的儿童及其父母/法定监护人完成了问卷。OK隐形眼镜组的所有儿童、代理和家长PedEyeQ领域的分数均高于SVS组(均P<0.05)。在轻度和中度近视亚组中,轻度近视OK隐形眼镜亚组的儿童、代理和家长PedEyeQ分数高于轻度近视SVS组(均P<0.05),代理PedEyeQ的功能性视力和受眼睛/视力困扰领域除外。同样,中度近视OK隐形眼镜亚组的儿童、代理和家长PedEyeQ分数高于中度近视SVS亚组(均P<0.05),家长PedEyeQ的对父母和家庭的影响领域除外。在眼镜类型的亚组分析中,OK隐形眼镜组和SVS组中,轻度和中度近视的任何儿童、代理和家长PedEyeQ领域的分数均无显著差异(均P>0.05)。
与佩戴SVS的儿童相比,佩戴OK隐形眼镜的儿童具有更好的功能性视力和眼相关生活质量。此外,与SVS相比,OK隐形眼镜具有更好的矫正效果、更高的接受率,对父母和家庭的影响更小。