• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

西班牙角膜塑形术控制近视:角膜塑形术接触镜与单焦眼镜的视力相关生活质量测量指标比较。

Myopia control with orthokeratology contact lenses in Spain: a comparison of vision-related quality-of-life measures between orthokeratology contact lenses and single-vision spectacles.

机构信息

Menicon Co., Ltd , Iglesia 9, Apartamento 106, Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Eye Contact Lens. 2013 Mar;39(2):153-7. doi: 10.1097/ICL.0b013e31827a0241.

DOI:10.1097/ICL.0b013e31827a0241
PMID:23392299
Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare vision-related quality-of-life measures between children wearing orthokeratology (OK) contact lenses and distance single-vision (SV) spectacles.

METHODS

Subjects 6 to 12 years of age and with myopia of -0.75 to -4.00 diopters and astigmatism less than or equal to 1.00 diopters were prospectively assigned OK contact lens or SV spectacle correction. A pediatric refractive error profile questionnaire was administered at 12- and 24-month intervals to evaluate children's perceptions in terms of overall vision, near vision, far distance vision, symptoms, appearance, satisfaction, activities, academic performance, handling, and peer perceptions. The mean score of all items was calculated as the overall score. Additionally, parents/guardians were asked to rate their child's mode of visual correction and their intention to continue treatment after study completion.

RESULTS

Thirty-one children were fitted with OK contact lenses and 30 with SV spectacles. Children wearing OK contact lenses rated overall vision, far distance vision, symptoms, appearance, satisfaction, activities, academic performance, handling, peer perceptions, and the overall score significantly better than children wearing SV spectacles (all P<0.05). Near vision and handling were, respectively, rated better (P<0.001) and similar (P=0.44) for SV spectacles in comparison to OK contact lenses. No significant differences were found between 12 and 24 months for any of the subjective ratings assessed (all P>0.05). Parents/guardians of children wearing OK contact lenses rated visual correction method and intention to continue treatment higher than parents of children wearing SV spectacles (P≤0.01).

CONCLUSION

The results indicate that the significant improvement in vision-related quality of life and acceptability with OK contact lenses is an incentive to engage in its use for the control of myopia in children.

摘要

目的

比较佩戴角膜塑形镜(OK)和单视远距(SV)眼镜的儿童的视觉相关生活质量测量结果。

方法

6 至 12 岁的儿童,近视度数为-0.75 至-4.00 屈光度,散光小于或等于 1.00 屈光度,被前瞻性分配 OK 接触镜或 SV 眼镜矫正。每隔 12 个月和 24 个月使用小儿屈光不正问卷评估儿童的整体视力、近视力、远视力、症状、外观、满意度、活动、学业成绩、处理能力和同伴看法。所有项目的平均分数计算为总分。此外,家长/监护人被要求对孩子的视觉矫正方式及其在研究结束后继续治疗的意愿进行评分。

结果

31 名儿童佩戴 OK 接触镜,30 名儿童佩戴 SV 眼镜。佩戴 OK 接触镜的儿童在整体视力、远视力、症状、外观、满意度、活动、学业成绩、处理能力、同伴看法和总分方面的评分均显著优于佩戴 SV 眼镜的儿童(均 P<0.05)。与 OK 接触镜相比,SV 眼镜的近视力和处理能力分别更好(P<0.001)和相似(P=0.44)。在任何主观评分中,12 个月和 24 个月之间均无显著差异(均 P>0.05)。佩戴 OK 接触镜的儿童的家长/监护人对视觉矫正方法和继续治疗的意愿评分高于佩戴 SV 眼镜的儿童(P≤0.01)。

结论

结果表明,OK 接触镜在改善视觉相关生活质量和可接受性方面具有显著优势,这是鼓励儿童使用 OK 接触镜控制近视的一个激励因素。

相似文献

1
Myopia control with orthokeratology contact lenses in Spain: a comparison of vision-related quality-of-life measures between orthokeratology contact lenses and single-vision spectacles.西班牙角膜塑形术控制近视:角膜塑形术接触镜与单焦眼镜的视力相关生活质量测量指标比较。
Eye Contact Lens. 2013 Mar;39(2):153-7. doi: 10.1097/ICL.0b013e31827a0241.
2
Myopia control with orthokeratology contact lenses in Spain: refractive and biometric changes.西班牙角膜塑形术控制近视:屈光和生物测量变化。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012 Jul 31;53(8):5060-5. doi: 10.1167/iovs.11-8005.
3
Orthokeratology vs. spectacles: adverse events and discontinuations.角膜塑形术与眼镜:不良事件和停用情况
Optom Vis Sci. 2012 Aug;89(8):1133-9. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e318263c5af.
4
MiSight Assessment Study Spain: A Comparison of Vision-Related Quality-of-Life Measures Between MiSight Contact Lenses and Single-Vision Spectacles.西班牙MiSight评估研究:MiSight隐形眼镜与单光眼镜在视力相关生活质量指标方面的比较
Eye Contact Lens. 2018 Nov;44 Suppl 2:S99-S104. doi: 10.1097/ICL.0000000000000413.
5
Vision-related quality of life of Chinese children undergoing orthokeratology treatment compared to single vision spectacles.与单焦眼镜相比,中国儿童进行角膜塑形术治疗后的与视觉相关的生活质量。
Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2021 Aug;44(4):101350. doi: 10.1016/j.clae.2020.07.001. Epub 2020 Jul 13.
6
Gas permeable (GP) versus non-GP lens wearers: accuracy of orthokeratology in myopia reduction.透气性(GP)与非透气性(non-GP)隐形眼镜佩戴者:角膜塑形术在近视降低方面的准确性。
Optom Vis Sci. 2007 May;84(5):417-21. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e318058a0f1.
7
Health-related quality of life for children using orthokeratology (OK), peripheral lenslet designed (PLD) and single-vision (SV) spectacles: based on Child Health Utility 9 Dimensions (CHU9D).基于儿童健康效用 9 维度量表(CHU9D)评估使用角膜塑形术(OK)、周边离焦设计(PLD)和单光(SV)眼镜的儿童的健康相关生活质量。
Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2023 Jun;46(3):101839. doi: 10.1016/j.clae.2023.101839. Epub 2023 Apr 4.
8
Patient and parent perceptions of myopia modalities.患者和家长对近视矫正方式的看法。
Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2023 Apr;46(2):101772. doi: 10.1016/j.clae.2022.101772. Epub 2022 Oct 27.
9
Quality of life of myopic subjects with different methods of visual correction using the NEI RQL-42 questionnaire.使用 NEI RQL-42 问卷评估不同视觉矫正方法对近视患者生活质量的影响。
Eye Contact Lens. 2012 Mar;38(2):116-21. doi: 10.1097/ICL.0b013e3182480e97.
10
High myopia-partial reduction orthokeratology (HM-PRO): study design.高度近视部分矫正角膜塑形术(HM-PRO):研究设计。
Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2013 Aug;36(4):164-70. doi: 10.1016/j.clae.2013.02.012. Epub 2013 Mar 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessment of the Quality of Life in Children and Adolescents with Myopia from the City of Varna.瓦尔纳市近视儿童和青少年生活质量评估
J Clin Med. 2025 Jun 26;14(13):4546. doi: 10.3390/jcm14134546.
2
Comparative study on the quality of life and clinical efficacy of orthokeratology lens, defocus spectacle lens and single vision spectacles in myopic children and adolescents in China.中国近视儿童青少年使用角膜塑形镜、离焦眼镜和单光眼镜的生活质量及临床疗效比较研究
BMJ Open Ophthalmol. 2025 May 27;10(1):e002168. doi: 10.1136/bmjophth-2025-002168.
3
Binocular Visual Performance Improvement in Children Following Overnight Orthokeratology Lens Wearing.
夜间佩戴角膜塑形镜后儿童双眼视觉性能的改善
Eye Contact Lens. 2025 Mar 18;51(6):247-253. doi: 10.1097/ICL.0000000000001179.
4
Health-related quality of life measurements in children and adolescents with refractive errors: A scoping review.屈光不正儿童和青少年的健康相关生活质量测量:一项范围综述。
Adv Ophthalmol Pract Res. 2024 Mar 7;4(2):84-94. doi: 10.1016/j.aopr.2024.03.001. eCollection 2024 May-Jun.
5
Retrospective Analysis of Axial Length Changes in Overnight Orthokeratology in an Academic Myopia Control Clinic.学术性近视控制临床中角膜塑形术治疗后眼轴长度变化的回顾性分析。
Optom Vis Sci. 2023 Sep 1;100(9):597-605. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000002060. Epub 2023 Aug 29.
6
IMI 2023 Digest.IMI 2023 文摘。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2023 May 1;64(6):7. doi: 10.1167/iovs.64.6.7.
7
Comparison of Functional Vision and Eye-Related Quality of Life between Myopic Children Treated with Orthokeratology and Single-Vision Spectacles in Southern China.中国南方地区接受角膜塑形术和单光眼镜治疗的近视儿童的功能性视力和与眼睛相关的生活质量比较。
J Ophthalmol. 2023 Apr 8;2023:7437935. doi: 10.1155/2023/7437935. eCollection 2023.
8
Assessment of the Clinical Effectiveness of DRL Orthokeratology Lenses vs. Single-Vision Spectacles in Controlling the Progression of Myopia in Children and Teenagers: 2 Year Retrospective Study.双折射角膜塑形镜与单焦眼镜控制儿童及青少年近视进展的临床效果评估:一项为期2年的回顾性研究
Children (Basel). 2023 Feb 18;10(2):402. doi: 10.3390/children10020402.
9
Interventions for myopia control in children: a living systematic review and network meta-analysis.儿童近视防控干预措施的系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Feb 16;2(2):CD014758. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014758.pub2.
10
Opportunities and threats to contact lens practice in Spain.西班牙隐形眼镜验配的机遇与挑战。
J Optom. 2023 Apr-Jun;16(2):116-127. doi: 10.1016/j.optom.2022.06.002. Epub 2022 Jul 9.