Shapiro Cheri J, Watson MacDonell Kathleen, Moran Mariah
Institute for Families in Society, College of Social Work, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.
Psychologist in Supervised Practice, Oshawa, ON, Canada.
Implement Res Pract. 2021 Jan 29;2:2633489520988258. doi: 10.1177/2633489520988258. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec.
Among the many variables that affect implementation of evidence-based interventions in real-world settings, self-efficacy is one of the most important factors at the provider level of the social ecology. Yet, research on the construct of provider self-efficacy remains limited.
This scoping review was conducted to enhance understanding of the construct of provider self-efficacy and to examine how the construct is defined and measured in the context of implementation of evidence-based mental health interventions.
Online databases were used to identify 190 papers published from 1999 to June of 2018 that included search terms for providers, evidence-based, and self-efficacy. To be eligible for the scoping review, papers needed to focus on the self-efficacy of mental health providers to deliver evidence-based psychosocial interventions. A total of 15 publications were included in the review.
The construct of provider self-efficacy is not clearly defined but is typically described as confidence to deliver a specific intervention or practice. A range of measures are used to assess provider self-efficacy across both provider and intervention types.
Standardized definition and measurement of provider self-efficacy is needed to advance practice and implementation research.
Provider self-efficacy is known to influence implementation of evidence-based mental health interventions. However, the ways in which provider self-efficacy is defined and measured in implementation research literature is not well understood; furthermore, it is not clear what types of providers and interventions are represented in this literature. This scoping review adds to current research by revealing that there is no agreed upon definition or measure of provider self-efficacy in the context of implementation of evidence-based interventions, and that the research includes multiple types of providers (e.g., social workers, counselors, psychologists) and interventions. Self-efficacy appears to change as a function of training and support. To further research in this area, a common definition and agreed upon measures of this construct are needed.
在影响循证干预措施在现实环境中实施的众多变量中,自我效能感是社会生态系统中提供者层面最重要的因素之一。然而,关于提供者自我效能感这一概念的研究仍然有限。
进行这项范围综述是为了增进对提供者自我效能感概念的理解,并探讨在循证心理健康干预措施实施的背景下,该概念是如何被定义和测量的。
利用在线数据库识别出1999年至2018年6月发表的190篇论文,这些论文包含了针对提供者、循证和自我效能感的检索词。要符合范围综述的条件,论文需聚焦于心理健康提供者实施循证心理社会干预措施的自我效能感。该综述共纳入了15篇出版物。
提供者自我效能感这一概念没有得到明确界定,但通常被描述为实施特定干预措施或实践的信心。针对不同类型的提供者和干预措施,使用了一系列测量方法来评估提供者的自我效能感。
需要对提供者自我效能感进行标准化的定义和测量,以推动实践和实施研究。
已知提供者自我效能感会影响循证心理健康干预措施的实施。然而,在实施研究文献中,提供者自我效能感是如何被定义和测量的,目前还没有得到很好的理解;此外,该文献中所涉及的提供者和干预措施类型也不明确。这项范围综述通过揭示在循证干预措施实施的背景下,对于提供者自我效能感没有一致认可的定义或测量方法,且该研究包括多种类型的提供者(如社会工作者、咨询师、心理学家)和干预措施,为当前研究增添了内容。自我效能感似乎会随着培训和支持而变化。为了进一步开展该领域的研究,需要对这一概念有一个共同的定义和一致认可的测量方法。