Azienda Socio-Sanitaria Territoriale dei Sette Laghi, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy.
Research Centre in Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine (EPIMED), Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy.
EBioMedicine. 2023 Feb;88:104435. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2022.104435. Epub 2023 Jan 9.
To date, only a few studies reported data regarding the development of mucosal immune response after the BNT162b2-booster vaccination.
Samples of both serum and saliva of 50 healthcare workers were collected at the day of the booster dose (T3) and after two weeks (T4). Anti-S1-protein IgG and IgA antibody titres and the neutralizing antibodies against the Wuhan wild-type Receptor-Binding Domain in both serum and saliva were measured by quantitative and competitive ELISA, respectively. Data were compared with those recorded after the primary vaccination cycle (T2). Neutralizing antibodies against the variants of concern were measured in those individuals with anti-Wuhan neutralizing antibodies in their saliva.
After eight months from the second dose, IgG decreased in both serum (T2: 23,838.5 ng/ml; T3: 1473.8 ng/ml) and saliva (T2: 12.9 ng/ml; T3: 0.3 ng/ml). Consistently, serum IgA decreased (T2: 48.6 ng/ml; T3: 6.4 ng/ml); however, salivary IgA showed a different behaviour and increased (T2: 0.06 ng/ml; T3: 0.41 ng/ml), indicating a delayed activation of mucosal immunity. The booster elicited higher titres of both IgG and IgA when compared with the primary cycle, in both serum (IgG T4: 98,493.9 ng/ml; IgA T4: 187.5 ng/ml) and saliva (IgG T4: 21.9 ng/ml; IgA T4: 0.65 ng/ml). Moreover, the booster re-established the neutralizing activity in the serum of all individuals, not only against the Wuhan wild-type antigen (N = 50; INH: 91.6%) but also against the variants (Delta INH: 91.3%; Delta Plus INH: 89.8%; Omicron BA.1 INH: 85.1%). By contrast, the salivary neutralizing activity was high against the Wuhan antigen in 72% of individuals (N = 36, INH: 62.2%), but decreased against the variants, especially against the Omicron BA.1 variant (Delta N = 27, INH: 43.1%; Delta Plus N = 24, INH: 35.2%; Omicron BA.1 N = 4; INH: 4.7%). This was suggestive for a different behaviour of systemic immunity observed in serum with respect to mucosal immunity described in saliva (Wald chi-square test, 3 df of interaction between variants and sample type = 308.2, p < 0.0001).
The BNT162b2-booster vaccination elicits a strong systemic immune response but fails in activating an effective mucosal immunity against the Omicron BA.1 variant.
This work was funded by the Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Insubria, and supported by Fondazione Umberto Veronesi (COVID-19 Insieme per la ricerca di tutti, 2020), Italy.
迄今为止,仅有少数研究报告了 BNT162b2 加强针接种后黏膜免疫应答的发展数据。
在加强针接种日(T3)和两周后(T4),采集 50 名医护人员的血清和唾液样本。通过定量和竞争 ELISA 分别检测血清和唾液中针对 S1 蛋白 IgG 和 IgA 抗体滴度以及针对武汉野生型受体结合域的中和抗体。将数据与初次接种周期(T2)记录的数据进行比较。在那些具有唾液中针对武汉中和抗体的个体中,测量针对关注变体的中和抗体。
在第二剂后八个月,血清中的 IgG(T2:23838.5ng/ml;T3:1473.8ng/ml)和唾液中的 IgG(T2:12.9ng/ml;T3:0.3ng/ml)均减少。相应地,血清 IgA 减少(T2:48.6ng/ml;T3:6.4ng/ml);然而,唾液 IgA 表现出不同的行为并增加(T2:0.06ng/ml;T3:0.41ng/ml),表明黏膜免疫的延迟激活。与初次接种周期相比,加强针在血清中引起更高的 IgG 和 IgA 滴度,在血清中(IgG T4:98493.9ng/ml;IgA T4:187.5ng/ml)和唾液中(IgG T4:21.9ng/ml;IgA T4:0.65ng/ml)。此外,加强针恢复了所有个体血清中的中和活性,不仅针对武汉野生型抗原(N=50;INH:91.6%),还针对变体(Delta INH:91.3%;Delta Plus INH:89.8%;Omicron BA.1 INH:85.1%)。相比之下,在 72%的个体(N=36,INH:62.2%)的唾液中针对武汉抗原的中和活性较高,但针对变体的中和活性降低,尤其是针对 Omicron BA.1 变体(Delta N=27,INH:43.1%;Delta Plus N=24,INH:35.2%;Omicron BA.1 N=4;INH:4.7%)。这表明与血清中观察到的全身性免疫不同,黏膜免疫在唾液中表现出不同的行为(Wald 卡方检验,3 个变异体和样本类型之间的交互作用自由度为 308.2,p<0.0001)。
BNT162b2 加强针接种引起强烈的全身性免疫应答,但未能激活针对 Omicron BA.1 变体的有效黏膜免疫。
这项工作得到了因苏布雷亚大学医学与外科学系的资助,并得到了翁贝托·韦尔罗内西基金会(COVID-19 Insieme per la ricerca di tutti,2020 年)的支持。