School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora.
Department of Dermatology, University of Colorado, Aurora.
JAMA Dermatol. 2023 Jun 1;159(6):648-658. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2023.0839.
Qualitative studies serve as a tool for dermatologists and researchers in dermatology to engage with and understand perspectives of populations with different cultures and backgrounds.
To assess (1) current approaches to qualitative dermatologic research and (2) the publication trends of these studies with the aim to inform researchers regarding qualitative research and its significance and applicability in the field of dermatology.
A scoping review was conducted in which PubMed and CINAHL Plus were searched using dermatology AND qualitative, dermatology, and 7 qualitative methods terms. Studies were selected for inclusion using 3 levels of screening. Level 1 excluded articles published in a language other than English. Level 2 excluded articles of studies involving mixed methods, quantitative methods, systematic review, and meta-analysis. Level 3 excluded articles that were not specific to general dermatology, medical dermatology, pediatric dermatology, dermatologic surgery, dermatopathology, or education and training associated with dermatology. Finally, all duplicates were removed. The searches were conducted from July 23 to 28, 2022. All articles obtained from PubMed and CINAHL Plus searches were recorded in REDCap.
A total of 1398 articles were reviewed, and of these, 249 (17.8%) were qualitative dermatology studies. Common qualitative methods included content analysis (58 [23.3%]) and grounded theory/constant comparison (35 [14.1%]). Individual interviews were the most common data collection method (198 [79.5%]), and patients (174 [69.9%]) were the most common participant type. Patient experience (137 [55.0%]) was the most common investigated topic. Overall, 131 qualitative studies (52.6%) in dermatology were published in dermatology journals, and 120 qualitative studies (48.2%) in dermatology were published between 2020 and 2022.
Qualitative research in dermatology is becoming more prevalent. There is value in qualitative research, and we encourage researchers in dermatology to incorporate qualitative methods in their studies.
定性研究是皮肤科医生和皮肤科研究人员的一种工具,可以让他们接触并理解来自不同文化和背景的人群的观点。
评估(1)当前定性皮肤科研究的方法,以及(2)这些研究的发表趋势,旨在让研究人员了解定性研究及其在皮肤科领域的重要性和适用性。
进行了一次范围界定审查,在 PubMed 和 CINAHL Plus 中使用了皮肤科和定性、皮肤科和 7 种定性方法这两个术语进行搜索。使用 3 个筛选级别选择纳入的研究。第 1 级排除了以非英语发表的文章。第 2 级排除了涉及混合方法、定量方法、系统评价和荟萃分析的研究文章。第 3 级排除了与一般皮肤科、医学皮肤科、儿科皮肤科、皮肤科手术、皮肤病理学或与皮肤科相关的教育和培训不相关的文章。最后,所有重复项都被删除。搜索于 2022 年 7 月 23 日至 28 日进行。从 PubMed 和 CINAHL Plus 搜索中获得的所有文章都被记录在 REDCap 中。
共审查了 1398 篇文章,其中 249 篇(17.8%)是定性皮肤科研究。常见的定性方法包括内容分析(58 [23.3%])和扎根理论/恒比法(35 [14.1%])。个体访谈是最常见的数据收集方法(198 [79.5%]),患者(174 [69.9%])是最常见的参与者类型。患者体验(137 [55.0%])是最常见的研究主题。总体而言,皮肤科的 131 项定性研究(52.6%)发表在皮肤科杂志上,皮肤科的 120 项定性研究(48.2%)发表于 2020 年至 2022 年期间。
皮肤科的定性研究越来越普遍。定性研究具有价值,我们鼓励皮肤科研究人员在研究中纳入定性方法。