• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Context matters in smoking prevention: evaluating smoke-free school hours in Danish vocational schools.在预防吸烟方面,背景因素很重要:评估丹麦职业学校的无烟校时政策。
Health Promot Int. 2023 Apr 1;38(2). doi: 10.1093/heapro/daad030.
2
School-based interventions TO Prevent Dating and Relationship Violence and Gender-Based Violence: STOP-DRV-GBV systematic review.基于学校的干预措施预防约会和伴侣暴力及基于性别的暴力:STOP-DRV-GBV 系统评价。
Public Health Res (Southampt). 2024 Feb;12(3):1-192. doi: 10.3310/KTWR6997.
3
Incentives for preventing smoking in children and adolescents.预防儿童和青少年吸烟的激励措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jun 6;6(6):CD008645. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008645.pub3.
4
Strategies for enhancing the implementation of school-based policies or practices targeting risk factors for chronic disease.加强针对慢性病风险因素的校本政策或实践实施的策略。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Nov 29;11(11):CD011677. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011677.pub2.
5
Comparison of Researcher-Led versus Teacher-Led effectiveness and fidelity: A Hybrid Type 1 study of Kids SIPsmartER in Appalachia middle schools.研究者主导与教师主导的效果和忠实度比较:阿巴拉契亚中学 Kids SIPsmartER 的混合 1 型研究。
Transl Behav Med. 2024 Oct 6;14(10):578-587. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibae041.
6
Effectiveness of the Let's Move It multi-level vocational school-based intervention on physical activity and sedentary behavior: a cluster randomized trial.“动起来”多层次职业学校干预措施对身体活动和久坐行为的有效性:一项整群随机试验
Ann Behav Med. 2025 Jan 4;59(1). doi: 10.1093/abm/kaaf023.
7
School-based programmes for preventing smoking.以学校为基础的预防吸烟计划。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Apr 30;2013(4):CD001293. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001293.pub3.
8
Feasibility study of Learning Together for Mental Health: fidelity, reach and acceptability of a whole-school intervention aiming to promote health and wellbeing in secondary schools.“共同学习促进心理健康”可行性研究:一项旨在促进中学健康与幸福的全校性干预措施的保真度、覆盖面和可接受性。
Public Health Res (Southampt). 2025 Jun 18:1-36. doi: 10.3310/RTRT0202.
9
Incentives for preventing smoking in children and adolescents.预防儿童和青少年吸烟的激励措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Oct 17;10:CD008645. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008645.pub2.
10
Measures implemented in the school setting to contain the COVID-19 pandemic.学校为控制 COVID-19 疫情而采取的措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jan 17;1(1):CD015029. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015029.

引用本文的文献

1
Implementation of school tobacco policies: The advocacy coalition approach. Protocol of the ADHAirE study, a cluster randomized controlled trial.学校烟草政策的实施:倡导联盟方法。ADHAirE研究方案,一项整群随机对照试验。
Tob Prev Cessat. 2025 Mar 24;11. doi: 10.18332/tpc/202392. eCollection 2025.
2
Do school-based smoking preventive interventions have unintended effects? Post hoc analysis of the Focus cluster randomised controlled trial.基于学校的吸烟预防干预措施是否有意外影响?聚焦群组随机对照试验的事后分析。
BMJ Open. 2024 Jan 8;14(1):e070176. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070176.
3
Effectiveness of the multi-component intervention 'Focus' on reducing smoking among students in the vocational education setting: a cluster randomized controlled trial.多组分干预措施“Focus”在减少职业教育环境中学生吸烟行为的效果:一项整群随机对照试验。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Mar 2;23(1):419. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15331-5.

本文引用的文献

1
Reducing smoking in youth by a smoke-free school environment: A stratified cluster randomized controlled trial of Focus, a multicomponent program for alternative high schools.通过无烟学校环境减少青少年吸烟:一项针对替代高中的多成分项目Focus的分层整群随机对照试验。
Tob Prev Cessat. 2021 Jun 2;7:42. doi: 10.18332/tpc/133934. eCollection 2021.
2
Are Danish vocational schools ready to implement "smoke-free school hours"? A qualitative study informed by the theory of organizational readiness for change.丹麦职业学校准备好实施“无烟课时”了吗?一项基于组织变革准备度理论的定性研究。
Implement Sci Commun. 2021 Apr 9;2(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s43058-021-00140-x.
3
Why Secondary Schools Do Not Implement Far-Reaching Smoke-Free Policies: Exploring Deep Core, Policy Core, and Secondary Beliefs of School Staff in the Netherlands.为何中学未能推行深远的无烟政策:探究荷兰中学教职人员的深层核心、政策核心和次要信念。
Int J Behav Med. 2019 Dec;26(6):608-618. doi: 10.1007/s12529-019-09818-y.
4
Associations of school tobacco policies and legislation with youth smoking: a cross-sectional study of Danish vocational high schools.丹麦职业高中学生吸烟现状及与学校烟草政策和立法的相关性:一项横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jul 24;9(7):e028357. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028357.
5
Understanding school staff members' enforcement of school tobacco policies to achieve tobacco-free school: a realist review.理解学校工作人员执行学校烟草政策以实现无烟学校:一个现实主义的综述。
Syst Rev. 2019 Jul 19;8(1):177. doi: 10.1186/s13643-019-1086-5.
6
Adolescent Smoking in Secondary Schools that Have Implemented Smoke-Free Policies: In-Depth Exploration of Shared Smoking Patterns.中学实施禁烟政策后青少年吸烟状况:共享吸烟模式的深入探讨。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jun 13;16(12):2100. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16122100.
7
Explaining Mechanisms That Influence Smoke-Free Implementation at the Local Level: A Realist Review of Smoking Bans.解释影响地方层面无烟实施的机制:禁烟令的现实主义审查。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2019 Nov 19;21(12):1609-1620. doi: 10.1093/ntr/nty206.
8
Effectiveness of the settings-based intervention Shaping the Social on preventing dropout from vocational education: a Danish non-randomized controlled trial.基于环境的干预措施 Shaping the Social 预防职业教育辍学的效果:丹麦的一项非随机对照试验。
BMC Psychol. 2018 Sep 12;6(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s40359-018-0258-8.
9
Preventing Smoking Progression in Young Adults: the Concept of Prevescalation.预防青年吸烟进展:前戒烟概念。
Prev Sci. 2019 Apr;20(3):377-384. doi: 10.1007/s11121-018-0880-y.
10
Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 79 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks, 1990-2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015.1990 - 2015年79种行为、环境与职业及代谢风险或风险群组的全球、区域和国家比较风险评估:全球疾病负担研究2015的系统分析
Lancet. 2016 Oct 8;388(10053):1659-1724. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31679-8.

在预防吸烟方面,背景因素很重要:评估丹麦职业学校的无烟校时政策。

Context matters in smoking prevention: evaluating smoke-free school hours in Danish vocational schools.

机构信息

National Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Studiestræde 6, Kobenhavn 1455, Denmark.

出版信息

Health Promot Int. 2023 Apr 1;38(2). doi: 10.1093/heapro/daad030.

DOI:10.1093/heapro/daad030
PMID:37099679
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10132565/
Abstract

Youth is a crucial period for smoking preventive interventions. School-based interventions targeting the policy level and the sociocultural processes of smoking show promising effects in reducing smoking uptake and prevalence. This study presents findings from the qualitative process evaluation of a smoking preventive intervention, Focus, in the vocational school (VET) setting. Specifically, the study focused on contextual factors affecting the implementation of smoke-free school hours (SFSH). Participant observations and focus groups were conducted in four VETs during the implementation period October-December 2018. The data encompass participant observation field notes (n = 21 school days), student focus groups (n = 8) (aged 16-20), teacher focus groups (n = 5) and semi-structured individual interviews with VET leaders (n = 3). The study found that SFSH was not clearly communicated to students due to the educational structure and chaotic rhythm of the school days, ambivalent attitudes among teachers toward enforcement of smoking rules and lack of clear managerial support. The interplay of these factors counteracted the implementation of SFSH in the VET context. The presented contextual factors are important when interpreting the effectiveness of the Focus intervention and for informing future preventive efforts aiming to reduce smoking among youth in high risk of smoking cigarettes.

摘要

青年时期是进行吸烟预防干预的关键时期。以政策层面和吸烟的社会文化进程为目标的学校为基础的干预措施,在减少吸烟率和吸烟流行率方面显示出了有前景的效果。本研究展示了一项在职业学校(VET)环境中进行的吸烟预防干预措施 Focus 的定性过程评估的结果。具体来说,该研究侧重于影响无烟学校时间(SFSH)实施的背景因素。在 2018 年 10 月至 12 月的实施期间,在四所 VET 中进行了参与者观察和焦点小组讨论。数据包括参与者观察的实地记录(n = 21 个上学日)、学生焦点小组(n = 8)(年龄在 16-20 岁之间)、教师焦点小组(n = 5)和 VET 领导的半结构化个人访谈(n = 3)。研究发现,由于教育结构和学校日子的混乱节奏,SFSH 并没有向学生清楚地传达,教师对执行吸烟规则的态度模棱两可,缺乏明确的管理支持。这些因素的相互作用抵消了 SFSH 在 VET 环境中的实施。在解释 Focus 干预措施的有效性和为未来旨在减少有吸烟风险的青年吸烟的预防工作提供信息时,呈现的背景因素非常重要。