• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

主动脉内球囊反搏与Impella装置在心源性休克中的支持作用:“计算机模拟”研究

IABP versus Impella Support in Cardiogenic Shock: "In Silico" Study.

作者信息

De Lazzari Beatrice, Capoccia Massimo, Badagliacca Roberto, Bozkurt Selim, De Lazzari Claudio

机构信息

Human Movement and Sport Sciences, "Foro Italico" University of Rome, 00147 Rome, Italy.

Northern General Hospital, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield S5 7AU, UK.

出版信息

J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2023 Mar 26;10(4):140. doi: 10.3390/jcdd10040140.

DOI:10.3390/jcdd10040140
PMID:37103019
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10198323/
Abstract

Cardiogenic shock (CS) is part of a clinical syndrome consisting of acute left ventricular failure causing severe hypotension leading to inadequate organ and tissue perfusion. The most commonly used devices to support patients affected by CS are Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump (IABP), Impella 2.5 pump and Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation. The aim of this study is the comparison between Impella and IABP using CARDIOSIM software simulator of the cardiovascular system. The results of the simulations included baseline conditions from a virtual patient in CS followed by IABP assistance in synchronised mode with different driving and vacuum pressures. Subsequently, the same baseline conditions were supported by the Impella 2.5 with different rotational speeds. The percentage variation with respect to baseline conditions was calculated for haemodynamic and energetic variables during IABP and Impella assistance. The Impella pump driven with a rotational speed of 50,000 rpm increased the total flow by 4.36% with a reduction in left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) by ≅15% to ≅30%. A reduction in left ventricular end systolic volume (LVESV) by ≅10% to ≅18% (≅12% to ≅33%) was observed with IABP (Impella) assistance. The simulation outcome suggests that assistance with the Impella device leads to higher reduction in LVESV, LVEDV, left ventricular external work and left atrial pressure-volume loop area compared to IABP support.

摘要

心源性休克(CS)是一种临床综合征的一部分,该综合征由急性左心室衰竭引起严重低血压,进而导致器官和组织灌注不足。用于支持受CS影响患者的最常用设备是主动脉内球囊反搏(IABP)、Impella 2.5泵和体外膜肺氧合。本研究的目的是使用心血管系统的CARDIOSIM软件模拟器比较Impella和IABP。模拟结果包括来自CS虚拟患者的基线条件,随后是IABP在不同驱动压力和真空压力下的同步模式辅助。随后,相同的基线条件由不同转速的Impella 2.5提供支持。计算了IABP和Impella辅助期间血流动力学和能量学变量相对于基线条件的百分比变化。以50000转/分钟的转速驱动的Impella泵使总流量增加了4.36%,左心室舒张末期容积(LVEDV)减少了约15%至约30%。在IABP(Impella)辅助下,观察到左心室收缩末期容积(LVESV)减少了约10%至约18%(约12%至约33%)。模拟结果表明,与IABP支持相比,Impella设备辅助导致LVESV、LVEDV、左心室外部功和左心房压力-容积环面积的降低幅度更大。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c8c/10198323/9dad56e4814a/jcdd-10-00140-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c8c/10198323/7a4bcc2cd5b2/jcdd-10-00140-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c8c/10198323/cb62c9283a25/jcdd-10-00140-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c8c/10198323/ff53ae6b79e8/jcdd-10-00140-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c8c/10198323/b83fc6512bc1/jcdd-10-00140-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c8c/10198323/1652aff2af27/jcdd-10-00140-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c8c/10198323/760353da31cc/jcdd-10-00140-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c8c/10198323/5476829e9d02/jcdd-10-00140-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c8c/10198323/45bcc72d8d5b/jcdd-10-00140-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c8c/10198323/d747c8c3cd8b/jcdd-10-00140-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c8c/10198323/9dad56e4814a/jcdd-10-00140-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c8c/10198323/7a4bcc2cd5b2/jcdd-10-00140-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c8c/10198323/cb62c9283a25/jcdd-10-00140-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c8c/10198323/ff53ae6b79e8/jcdd-10-00140-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c8c/10198323/b83fc6512bc1/jcdd-10-00140-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c8c/10198323/1652aff2af27/jcdd-10-00140-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c8c/10198323/760353da31cc/jcdd-10-00140-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c8c/10198323/5476829e9d02/jcdd-10-00140-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c8c/10198323/45bcc72d8d5b/jcdd-10-00140-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c8c/10198323/d747c8c3cd8b/jcdd-10-00140-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c8c/10198323/9dad56e4814a/jcdd-10-00140-g010.jpg

相似文献

1
IABP versus Impella Support in Cardiogenic Shock: "In Silico" Study.主动脉内球囊反搏与Impella装置在心源性休克中的支持作用:“计算机模拟”研究
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2023 Mar 26;10(4):140. doi: 10.3390/jcdd10040140.
2
Modelling and Simulation of the Combined Use of IABP and Impella as a Rescue Procedure in Cardiogenic Shock: An Alternative for Non-Transplant Centres?主动脉内球囊反搏(IABP)与Impella联合用于心源性休克抢救程序的建模与模拟:非移植中心的一种替代方案?
Bioengineering (Basel). 2023 Dec 17;10(12):1434. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering10121434.
3
Mechanical circulatory support with the Impella® LP5.0 pump and an intra-aortic balloon pump for cardiogenic shock in acute myocardial infarction: The IMPELLA-STIC randomized study.急性心肌梗死后心源性休克应用 Impella® LP5.0 泵和主动脉内球囊反搏进行机械循环支持:IMPELLA-STIC 随机研究。
Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2020 Apr;113(4):237-243. doi: 10.1016/j.acvd.2019.10.005. Epub 2019 Nov 15.
4
Impella Support for Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock.经皮 Impella 辅助治疗伴心原性休克的急性心肌梗死。
Circulation. 2019 Mar 5;139(10):1249-1258. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.036614.
5
Percutaneous left ventricular assistance in post cardiac arrest shock: comparison of intra aortic blood pump and IMPELLA Recover LP2.5.经皮左心室辅助在心脏骤停后休克中的应用:主动脉内血液泵和 IMPELLA Recover LP2.5 的比较。
Resuscitation. 2013 May;84(5):609-15. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2012.10.001. Epub 2012 Oct 13.
6
Influence of Timing and Predicted Risk on Mortality in Impella-Treated Infarct-Related Cardiogenic Shock Patients.时机和预测风险对接受Impella治疗的心肌梗死相关心源性休克患者死亡率的影响。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2020 May 14;7:74. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2020.00074. eCollection 2020.
7
In vitro comparison of support capabilities of intra-aortic balloon pump and Impella 2.5 left percutaneous.经导管主动脉内球囊反搏泵和 Impella 2.5 左心室内径经皮支持能力的体外比较。
Artif Organs. 2011 Sep;35(9):893-901. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1594.2011.01286.x. Epub 2011 Aug 7.
8
Percutaneous left ventricular assist support is associated with less pulmonary congestion and lower rate of pneumonia in patients with cardiogenic shock.经皮左心室辅助支持与心源性休克患者的肺淤血减少及肺炎发生率降低相关。
Open Heart. 2020 Nov;7(2). doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2020-001385.
9
Veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation with concomitant Impella versus concomitant intra-aortic-balloon-pump for cardiogenic shock.静脉-动脉体外膜肺氧合联合 Impella 与联合主动脉内球囊泵治疗心源性休克。
Perfusion. 2023 Jan;38(1):51-57. doi: 10.1177/02676591211033947. Epub 2021 Jul 28.
10
Impella versus IABP in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock.在急性心肌梗死合并心源性休克中,Impella 与 IABP 比较。
Open Heart. 2019 May 13;6(1):e000987. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2018-000987. eCollection 2019.

引用本文的文献

1
Modelling and Simulation of the Interactions Between the Cardiovascular System and the Combined Use of VA ECMO and IABP: Comparison Between Peripheral and Central Configurations.心血管系统与VA体外膜肺氧合和主动脉内球囊反搏联合使用之间相互作用的建模与仿真:外周与中心配置的比较
Bioengineering (Basel). 2025 May 17;12(5):540. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering12050540.
2
Design and Analysis of a Polymeric Left Ventricular Simulator via Computational Modelling.基于计算建模的聚合物左心室模拟器的设计与分析
Biomimetics (Basel). 2024 Apr 28;9(5):269. doi: 10.3390/biomimetics9050269.
3
The intelligent Impella: Future perspectives of artificial intelligence in the setting of Impella support.

本文引用的文献

1
Ventricular and Atrial Pressure-Volume Loops: Analysis of the Effects Induced by Right Centrifugal Pump Assistance.心室和心房压力-容积环:右心离心泵辅助诱导效应的分析
Bioengineering (Basel). 2022 Apr 20;9(5):181. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering9050181.
2
Intra-aortic balloon pump versus percutaneous Impella in emergency revascularisation for myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock: systematic review.主动脉内球囊泵与经皮 Impella 在心肌梗死和心源性休克的紧急血运重建中的比较:系统评价。
Perfusion. 2024 Jan;39(1):45-59. doi: 10.1177/02676591211037026. Epub 2021 Sep 3.
3
IMPELLA or Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Left Ventricular Dominant Refractory Cardiogenic Shock.
智能 Impella:人工智能在 Impella 支持中的未来展望。
ESC Heart Fail. 2024 Oct;11(5):2933-2940. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.14865. Epub 2024 May 23.
4
Concomitant use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and percutaneous microaxial assist device support for cardiogenic shock.体外膜肺氧合与经皮微轴辅助装置联合用于心源性休克的支持治疗。
JTCVS Open. 2023 Dec 21;17:152-161. doi: 10.1016/j.xjon.2023.12.005. eCollection 2024 Feb.
5
Modelling and Simulation of the Combined Use of IABP and Impella as a Rescue Procedure in Cardiogenic Shock: An Alternative for Non-Transplant Centres?主动脉内球囊反搏(IABP)与Impella联合用于心源性休克抢救程序的建模与模拟:非移植中心的一种替代方案?
Bioengineering (Basel). 2023 Dec 17;10(12):1434. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering10121434.
用于左心室主导型难治性心源性休克的Impella或体外膜肺氧合
J Clin Med. 2021 Feb 14;10(4):759. doi: 10.3390/jcm10040759.
4
ECMO Assistance during Mechanical Ventilation: Effects Induced on Energetic and Haemodynamic Variables.机械通气时的体外膜肺氧合辅助:对能量和血流动力学变量的影响。
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2021 Apr;202:106003. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2021.106003. Epub 2021 Feb 14.
5
Prevention and treatment of pulmonary congestion in patients undergoing venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for cardiogenic shock.心源性休克患者接受静脉-动脉体外膜肺氧合时肺充血的预防与治疗
Eur Heart J. 2020 Oct 7;41(38):3753-3761. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa547.
6
Impella Versus Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Acute Myocardial Infarction Cardiogenic Shock.Impella 与体外膜肺氧合治疗急性心肌梗死合并心原性休克。
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2020 Dec;21(12):1465-1471. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2020.05.042. Epub 2020 May 30.
7
Comparison of Hemodynamic Support by Impella vs. Peripheral Extra-Corporeal Membrane Oxygenation: A Porcine Model of Acute Myocardial Infarction.Impella与外周体外膜肺氧合血流动力学支持的比较:急性心肌梗死猪模型
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2020 Jun 10;7:99. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2020.00099. eCollection 2020.
8
Intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation timing: A new numerical model for programming and training in the clinical environment.主动脉内球囊反搏计时:一种新的数值模型,用于临床环境中的编程和培训。
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2020 Oct;194:105537. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105537. Epub 2020 May 15.
9
Assessing Cerebrovascular Hemodynamics Using Transcranial Doppler in Patients with Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices.使用经颅多普勒评估机械循环支持装置患者的脑血管血液动力学。
J Neuroimaging. 2020 May;30(3):297-302. doi: 10.1111/jon.12694. Epub 2020 Feb 10.
10
Intraaortic Balloon Pump in Cardiogenic Shock Complicating Acute Myocardial Infarction: Long-Term 6-Year Outcome of the Randomized IABP-SHOCK II Trial.主动脉内球囊反搏治疗急性心肌梗死并发心源性休克:随机对照IABP-SHOCK II试验的6年长期结果
Circulation. 2019 Jan 15;139(3):395-403. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.038201. Epub 2018 Nov 11.