Agnelli Caroline, Guimarães Thaís, Sukiennik Teresa, Lima Paulo Roberto Passos, Salles Mauro José, Breda Giovanni Luís, Queiroz-Telles Flavio, Chaves Magri Marcello Mihailenko, Mendes Ana Verena, Camargo Luís Fernando Aranha, Morales Hugo, de Carvalho Hessel Dias Viviane Maria, Rossi Flávia, Colombo Arnaldo Lopes
Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo 04024-002, Brazil.
Hospital do Servidor Público Estadual de São Paulo, São Paulo 04039-000, Brazil.
J Fungi (Basel). 2023 Apr 13;9(4):468. doi: 10.3390/jof9040468.
Candidemia remains a major public health challenge due to its high mortality rates, especially in developing countries. Monitoring epidemiological trends may provide insights for better clinical outcomes. This study aimed to describe trends in the epidemiology, therapeutic practices, and mortality in candidemia through a retrospective comparative analysis between two surveillance cohorts of all candidemic adults at eleven tertiary hospitals in Brazil, from 2010-2011 (Period I) versus 2017-2018 (Period II). A total of 616 cases were diagnosed, with 247 being from Period II. These patients were more likely to have three or more coexisting comorbidities [72 (29.1%) vs. 60 (16.3%), < 0.001], had a prior history of in-hospital admissions more often [102 (40.3%) vs. 79 (21.4%), = 0.001], and presented with candidemia earlier after admission, within 15 days (0-328) vs. 19 (0-188), = 0.01. Echinocandins were more frequently prescribed [102 (41.3%) vs. 50 (13.6%), = 0.001], but time to antifungal initiation [2 days (0-14) vs. 2 (0-13), = 0.369] and CVC removal within 48 h [90/185 (48.6%) vs. 148/319 (46.4%), = 0.644] remained unchanged. Additionally, many patients went untreated in both periods I and II [87 (23.6%) vs. 43 (17.4%), = 0.07], respectively. Unfortunately, no improvements in mortality rates at 14 days [123 (33.6%) vs. 93 (37.7%), = 0.343] or at 30 days [188 (51.4%) vs. 120 (48.6%), = 0.511] were observed. In conclusion, mortality rates remain exceedingly high despite therapeutic advances, probably associated with an increase in patients' complexity and suboptimal therapeutic interventions. Management strategies should be tailored to suit epidemiological changes, expedite diagnosis to reduce the number of untreated eligible patients and guarantee early antifungal initiation and source control.
念珠菌血症因其高死亡率,仍然是一项重大的公共卫生挑战,尤其是在发展中国家。监测流行病学趋势可为改善临床结局提供见解。本研究旨在通过对巴西11家三级医院2010 - 2011年(第一阶段)与2017 - 2018年(第二阶段)所有念珠菌血症成年患者的两个监测队列进行回顾性比较分析,描述念珠菌血症的流行病学、治疗实践和死亡率趋势。共诊断出616例病例,其中247例来自第二阶段。这些患者更有可能有三种或更多并存的合并症[72例(29.1%)对60例(16.3%),<0.001],更常具有住院史[102例(40.3%)对79例(21.4%),=0.001],且入院后更早出现念珠菌血症,在15天内(0 - 328天)对19天(0 - 188天),=0.01。棘白菌素类药物的处方更为频繁[102例(41.3%)对50例(13.6%),=0.001],但抗真菌药物开始使用时间[2天(0 - 14天)对2天(0 - 13天),=0.369]和48小时内拔除中心静脉导管[90/185例(48.6%)对148/319例(46.4%),=0.644]保持不变。此外,在第一阶段和第二阶段分别有许多患者未接受治疗[87例(23.6%)对43例(17.4%),=0.07]。遗憾的是,未观察到14天[123例(33.6%)对93例(37.7%),=0.343]或30天[188例(51.4%)对120例(48.6%),=0.511]死亡率的改善。总之,尽管治疗取得进展,但死亡率仍然极高,这可能与患者病情复杂性增加和治疗干预欠佳有关。管理策略应根据流行病学变化进行调整,加快诊断以减少未治疗的符合条件患者数量,并确保早期开始抗真菌治疗和源头控制。