Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Department of Infectious Diseases, Infection Control and Employee Health, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Mar 31;59(4):691. doi: 10.3390/medicina59040691.
: Vancomycin combined with piperacillin/tazobactam (vancomycin + piperacillin/tazobactam) has a higher risk of acute kidney injury (AKI) than vancomycin combined with cefepime or meropenem. However, it is uncertain if applying area under the curve (AUC)-based vancomycin dosing has less nephrotoxicity than trough-based dosing in these combinations. : We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov from inception to December 2022. We examined the odds ratio (OR) of AKI between vancomycin + piperacillin/tazobactam and the control group. The control group was defined as vancomycin combined with antipseudomonal beta-lactam antibiotics, except for piperacillin-tazobactam. : The OR for AKI is significantly higher in vancomycin + piperacillin/tazobactam compared with the control group (3 studies, 866 patients, OR of 3.861, 95% confidence interval of 2.165 to 6.887, < 0.05). In the sample population of patients who received vancomycin + piperacillin/tazobactam (2 studies, 536 patients), the risk of AKI (OR of 0.715, 95% CI of 0.439 to 1.163, = 0.177) and daily vancomycin dose (standard mean difference-0.139, 95% CI-0.458 to 0.179; = 0.392) are lower by AUC-based dosing than trough-based dosing, although it is not statistically significant. : Nephrotoxicity is higher when combined with piperacillin/tazobactam than other antipseudomonal beta-lactam antibiotics (cefepime or meropenem) using the AUC-based dosing. However, applying the AUC-based dosing did not eliminate the risk of AKI or significantly reduce thedaily vancomycin dose compared with the trough-based dosing in the available literature.
: 与头孢吡肟或美罗培南相比,万古霉素联合哌拉西林/他唑巴坦(万古霉素+哌拉西林/他唑巴坦)发生急性肾损伤(AKI)的风险更高。然而,目前尚不确定在这些联合用药中,基于 AUC 的万古霉素给药方案是否比基于谷值的给药方案肾毒性更小。 : 我们检索了 PubMed、Embase、Cochrane Library 和 ClinicalTrials.gov 从建库至 2022 年 12 月的数据。我们比较了万古霉素+哌拉西林/他唑巴坦与对照组(除哌拉西林/他唑巴坦外,与抗假单胞菌β-内酰胺类抗生素联合的万古霉素)发生 AKI 的比值比(OR)。 : 与对照组相比,万古霉素+哌拉西林/他唑巴坦发生 AKI 的 OR 显著更高(3 项研究,866 例患者,OR 为 3.861,95%CI 为 2.165 至 6.887, < 0.05)。在接受万古霉素+哌拉西林/他唑巴坦治疗的患者样本人群中(2 项研究,536 例患者),AKI 的风险(OR 为 0.715,95%CI 为 0.439 至 1.163, = 0.177)和每日万古霉素剂量(标准均数差-0.139,95%CI-0.458 至 0.179; = 0.392)均低于 AUC 方案,但无统计学意义。 : 与其他抗假单胞菌β-内酰胺类抗生素(头孢吡肟或美罗培南)相比,采用 AUC 方案时,联合哌拉西林/他唑巴坦时肾毒性更高。然而,在现有文献中,与基于谷值的给药方案相比,AUC 方案并未消除 AKI 的风险,也未显著降低每日万古霉素剂量。