Gomes Bianca, Dias Marta, Cervantes Renata, Pena Pedro, Santos Joana, Vasconcelos Pinto Marta, Viegas Carla
CE3C-Center for Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Change, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade de Lisboa, 1749-016 Lisbon, Portugal.
H&TRC-Health & Technology Research Center, ESTeSL-Escola Superior de Tecnologia e Saúde, Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa, 1990-096 Lisbon, Portugal.
Toxics. 2023 Apr 14;11(4):374. doi: 10.3390/toxics11040374.
This study reports the search of available data published regarding microbial occupational exposure assessment in poultries, following the PRISMA methodology. Air collection through filtration was the most frequently used. The most commonly used passive sampling method was material collection such as dust, cages, soils, sediment, and wastewater. Regarding assays applied, the majority of studies comprised culture-based methods, but molecular tools were also frequently used. Screening for antimicrobial susceptibility was performed only for bacteria; cytotoxicity, virological and serological assays were also performed. Most of the selected studies focused on bacteria, although fungi, endotoxins, and β-glucans were also assessed. The only study concerning fungi and mycotoxins reported the carcinogenic mycotoxin AFB1. This study gives a comprehensive overview of microbial contamination in the poultry industry, emphasizing this setting as a potential reservoir of microbial pathogens threatening human, animal, and environmental health. Additionally, this research helps to provide a sampling and analysis protocol proposal to evaluate the microbiological contamination in these facilities. Few articles were found reporting fungal contamination in poultry farms worldwide. In addition, information concerning fungal resistance profile and mycotoxin contamination remain scarce. Overall, a One Health approach should be incorporated in exposure assessments and the knowledge gaps identified in this paper should be addressed in further research.
本研究报告了按照PRISMA方法对已发表的有关家禽微生物职业暴露评估的现有数据进行的检索。通过过滤收集空气是最常用的方法。最常用的被动采样方法是收集诸如灰尘、笼子、土壤、沉积物和废水等物质。关于所应用的检测方法,大多数研究采用基于培养的方法,但分子工具也经常被使用。仅对细菌进行了抗菌药敏筛选;还进行了细胞毒性、病毒学和血清学检测。大多数选定的研究集中在细菌上,尽管也评估了真菌、内毒素和β-葡聚糖。唯一一项关于真菌和霉菌毒素的研究报告了致癌霉菌毒素黄曲霉毒素B1。本研究全面概述了家禽行业中的微生物污染情况,强调该环境是威胁人类、动物和环境健康的微生物病原体的潜在储存库。此外,本研究有助于提供一份采样和分析方案建议,以评估这些设施中的微生物污染情况。在全球范围内,很少有文章报道家禽养殖场的真菌污染情况。此外,关于真菌耐药谱和霉菌毒素污染的信息仍然匮乏。总体而言,应将“同一健康”方法纳入暴露评估中,本文中确定的知识空白应在进一步研究中加以解决。