Jacob Jorge, Biering-Sørensen Tor, Holger Ehlers Lars, Edwards Christina H, Mohn Kristin Greve-Isdahl, Nilsson Anna, Hjelmgren Jonas, Ma Wenkang, Sharma Yuvraj, Ciglia Emanuele, Mould-Quevedo Joaquin
IQVIA, London W2 1AF, UK.
Department of Cardiology, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, 2730 Herlev, Denmark.
Vaccines (Basel). 2023 Mar 29;11(4):753. doi: 10.3390/vaccines11040753.
Individuals aged 65 years and above are at increased risk of complications and death from influenza compared with any other age group. Enhanced vaccines, as the MF59-adjuvanted quadrivalent influenza vaccine (aQIV) and the high-dose quadrivalent influenza vaccine (HD-QIV), provide increased protection for older adults in comparison to the traditional standard-dose quadrivalent influenza vaccines (SD-QIV). This study aimed to assess the cost-effectiveness of aQIV compared to SD-QIV and HD-QIV in Denmark, Norway, and Sweden for adults aged ≥65 years. A static decision tree model was used to evaluate costs and outcomes of different vaccination strategies from healthcare payer and societal perspectives. This model projects that compared to SD-QIV, vaccination with aQIV could prevent a combined total of 18,772 symptomatic influenza infections, 925 hospitalizations, and 161 deaths in one influenza season across the three countries. From a healthcare payer perspective, the incremental costs per quality adjusted life year (QALY) gained with aQIV versus SD-QIV were EUR 10,170/QALY in Denmark, EUR 12,515/QALY in Norway, and EUR 9894/QALY in Sweden. The aQIV was cost saving compared with HD-QIV. This study found that introducing aQIV to the entire population aged ≥65 years may contribute to reducing the disease and economic burden associated with influenza in these countries.
与其他任何年龄组相比,65岁及以上的人群因流感出现并发症和死亡的风险更高。与传统的标准剂量四价流感疫苗(SD-QIV)相比,增强型疫苗,如含MF59佐剂的四价流感疫苗(aQIV)和高剂量四价流感疫苗(HD-QIV),可为老年人提供更高的保护。本研究旨在评估在丹麦、挪威和瑞典,aQIV与SD-QIV和HD-QIV相比,对65岁及以上成年人的成本效益。采用静态决策树模型从医疗保健支付方和社会角度评估不同疫苗接种策略的成本和结果。该模型预测,与SD-QIV相比,在一个流感季节,三个国家使用aQIV进行疫苗接种总共可预防18,772例有症状的流感感染、925例住院和161例死亡。从医疗保健支付方的角度来看,丹麦aQIV相对于SD-QIV每获得一个质量调整生命年(QALY)的增量成本为10,170欧元/QALY,挪威为12,515欧元/QALY,瑞典为9894欧元/QALY。与HD-QIV相比,aQIV具有成本节约效果。本研究发现,对所有65岁及以上人群引入aQIV可能有助于减轻这些国家与流感相关的疾病和经济负担。