• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

未经训练的女性在血流限制训练期间对疲劳与非疲劳的神经肌肉反应。

Neuromuscular Responses to Failure vs Non-Failure During Blood Flow Restriction Training in Untrained Females.

作者信息

Proppe Christopher E, Aldeghi Taylor M, Rivera Paola M, Gonzalez-Rojas David H, Hill Ethan C

机构信息

School of Kinesiology and Physical Therapy, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, USA.

Florida Space Institute, Orlando, FL, USA.

出版信息

Int J Exerc Sci. 2023 Feb 1;16(1):293-303. doi: 10.70252/VBYY9439. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.70252/VBYY9439
PMID:37113263
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10124729/
Abstract

Applying blood flow restriction (BFR) during resistance exercise is a potent stimulus of muscular adaption, but there is little direct comparison of its effect on neuromuscular function. The purpose of this investigation was to compare surface electromyography amplitude and frequency responses during a 75 (1 × 30, 3 × 15) repetition bout (BFR-75) of BFR to 4 sets to failure (BFR-F). Twelve women (mean ± SD age = 22 ± 4 years; body mass = 72 ± 14.4 kg; height = 162.1 ± 4.0 cm) volunteered for the investigation. One leg was randomly assigned to complete BFR-75 and the other to BFR-F. Each leg performed isokinetic, unilateral, concentric-eccentric, leg extension at 30% of maximal strength while surface electromyographic (sEMG) data was recorded. More repetitions ( = 0.006) were completed during set 2 for BFR-F (21.2 ± 7.4) than BFR-75 (14.7 ± 1.2), but there were no other between condition differences for set 1 (29.8 ± 0.9 vs 28.9 ± 10.1), set 3 (14.4 ± 1.4 vs 17.1 ± 6.9), or set 4 (14.8 ± 0.9 vs 16.3 ± 7.0). Collapsed across condition, normalized sEMG amplitude increased ( 0.014, 132.66 ± 14.03% to 208.21 ± 24.82%) across the first three sets of exercise then plateaued, while normalized sEMG frequency decreased ( = 0.342, 103.07 ± 3.89% to 83.73 ± 4.47%) across the first two sets then plateaued. The present findings indicated that BFR-75 and BFR-F elicited similar acute neuromuscular fatigue responses. The plateau in amplitude and frequency suggested that maximal motor unit excitation and metabolic buildup may be maximized after two to three sets of BFR-75 and BFR-F.

摘要

在抗阻运动期间应用血流限制(BFR)是肌肉适应的一种有效刺激,但关于其对神经肌肉功能影响的直接比较却很少。本研究的目的是比较在75次(1组30次、3组15次)重复组次的BFR训练(BFR - 75)与4组至力竭训练(BFR - F)过程中表面肌电图的幅度和频率反应。12名女性(平均年龄±标准差=22±4岁;体重=72±14.4千克;身高=162.1±4.0厘米)自愿参与本研究。一条腿被随机分配完成BFR - 75训练,另一条腿完成BFR - F训练。每条腿在最大力量的30%下进行等速、单侧、向心 - 离心的腿部伸展运动,同时记录表面肌电图(sEMG)数据。BFR - F组在第2组完成的重复次数(21.2±7.4次)多于BFR - 75组(14.7±1.2次)(P = 0.006),但在第1组(29.8±0.9次对28.9±10.1次)、第3组(14.4±1.4次对17.1±6.9次)或第4组(14.8±0.9次对16.3±7.0次)中,两组之间没有其他差异。综合所有训练条件来看,在前三组运动中,标准化sEMG幅度增加(P = 0.014,从132.66±14.03%增加到208.21±24.82%),然后趋于平稳,而标准化sEMG频率在前两组中降低(P = 0.342,从103.07±3.89%降低到83.73±4.47%),然后趋于平稳。目前的研究结果表明,BFR - 75和BFR - F引发了相似的急性神经肌肉疲劳反应。幅度和频率的平稳状态表明,在进行两到三组BFR - 75和BFR - F训练后,最大运动单位兴奋和代谢积累可能达到最大化。

相似文献

1
Neuromuscular Responses to Failure vs Non-Failure During Blood Flow Restriction Training in Untrained Females.未经训练的女性在血流限制训练期间对疲劳与非疲劳的神经肌肉反应。
Int J Exerc Sci. 2023 Feb 1;16(1):293-303. doi: 10.70252/VBYY9439. eCollection 2023.
2
Muscle Swelling and Neuromuscular Responses Following Blood Flow Restricted Exercise in Untrained Women.未经训练女性进行血流限制运动后的肌肉肿胀和神经肌肉反应
Res Q Exerc Sport. 2025 Jun;96(2):248-258. doi: 10.1080/02701367.2024.2391422. Epub 2024 Sep 4.
3
75-repetition versus sets to failure of blood flow restriction exercise on indices of muscle damage in women.75 次重复与血流限制运动至力竭对女性肌肉损伤指标的影响。
Eur J Sport Sci. 2023 Oct;23(10):1993-2001. doi: 10.1080/17461391.2023.2201813. Epub 2023 May 9.
4
Greater neuromuscular fatigue following low-load blood flow restriction than non-blood flow restriction resistance exercise among recreationally active men.在业余活跃男性中,低负荷血流限制比非血流限制抗阻运动后神经肌肉疲劳更大。
J Neurophysiol. 2022 Jul 1;128(1):73-85. doi: 10.1152/jn.00028.2022. Epub 2022 Jun 15.
5
A Moderate Blood Flow Restriction Pressure Does Not Affect Maximal Strength or Neuromuscular Responses.适度的血流限制压力不会影响最大力量或神经肌肉反应。
J Strength Cond Res. 2024 Dec 1;38(12):e727-e734. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000004907. Epub 2024 Aug 14.
6
Effects of load matched isokinetic versus isotonic blood flow restricted exercise on neuromuscular and muscle function.等速与等张血流限制运动对神经肌肉和肌肉功能的影响。
Eur J Sport Sci. 2023 Aug;23(8):1629-1637. doi: 10.1080/17461391.2023.2184724. Epub 2023 Apr 28.
7
Influence of Blood Flow Restriction on Neuromuscular Function and Fatigue During Forearm Flexion in Men.血流限制对男性前臂屈伸过程中神经肌肉功能和疲劳的影响。
J Strength Cond Res. 2024 Jul 1;38(7):e349-e358. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000004762.
8
Blood flow restriction attenuates surface mechanomyography lateral and longitudinal, but not transverse oscillations during fatiguing exercise.血流限制减弱疲劳运动中表面肌电信号的横向、纵向,但不是横向振动。
Physiol Meas. 2024 Apr 9;45(4). doi: 10.1088/1361-6579/ad360b.
9
Acute Neuromuscular and Microvascular Responses to Concentric and Eccentric Exercises With Blood Flow Restriction.血流限制下向心和离心运动对急性神经肌肉和微血管的反应。
J Strength Cond Res. 2020 Oct;34(10):2725-2733. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000003372.
10
Acute Responses of Low-Load Resistance Exercise with Blood Flow Restriction.低负荷血流限制抗阻运动的急性反应
J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2024 Dec 4;9(4):254. doi: 10.3390/jfmk9040254.

引用本文的文献

1
Does Protocol Matter for Repetition Volume? A Meta-Analytic Investigation of Volitional Failure Versus the Traditionally Used 75-Repetition Blood Flow Restriction Resistance Training.训练方案对重复训练量有影响吗?对意志性疲劳与传统的75次重复血流限制抗阻训练的荟萃分析研究
Sports Med Open. 2025 Jul 15;11(1):84. doi: 10.1186/s40798-025-00892-z.

本文引用的文献

1
Is There a Minimum Effective Dose for Vascular Occlusion During Blood Flow Restriction Training?血流限制训练期间血管闭塞是否存在最小有效剂量?
Front Physiol. 2022 Apr 8;13:838115. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2022.838115. eCollection 2022.
2
Defining Training and Performance Caliber: A Participant Classification Framework.定义培训和绩效水平:参与者分类框架。
Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2022 Feb 1;17(2):317-331. doi: 10.1123/ijspp.2021-0451. Epub 2022 Dec 29.
3
Invasive Assessment of Hemodynamic, Metabolic and Ionic Consequences During Blood Flow Restriction Training.血流限制训练期间血流动力学、代谢和离子后果的侵入性评估
Front Physiol. 2020 Dec 16;11:617668. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2020.617668. eCollection 2020.
4
The effect of blood-flow-restricted interval training on lactate and H dynamics during dynamic exercise in man.血流限制间歇训练对人体动态运动中乳酸和氢离子动态的影响。
Acta Physiol (Oxf). 2021 Mar;231(3):e13580. doi: 10.1111/apha.13580. Epub 2020 Dec 2.
5
Ethical Issues Relating to Scientific Discovery in Exercise Science.运动科学中与科学发现相关的伦理问题。
Int J Exerc Sci. 2020 Sep 1;12(1):1-8. doi: 10.70252/EYCD6235. eCollection 2019.
6
Eccentric and concentric blood flow restriction resistance training on indices of delayed onset muscle soreness in untrained women.离心和向心血流限制抗阻训练对未经训练女性延迟性肌肉酸痛指标的影响。
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2019 Oct;119(10):2363-2373. doi: 10.1007/s00421-019-04220-8. Epub 2019 Aug 31.
7
Blood flow restriction augments the skeletal muscle response during very low-load resistance exercise to volitional failure.血流限制可增强极低负荷抗阻运动至自主疲劳时的骨骼肌反应。
Physiol Int. 2019 Jun 1;106(2):180-193. doi: 10.1556/2060.106.2019.15. Epub 2019 Jul 2.
8
Blood Flow Restriction Exercise: Considerations of Methodology, Application, and Safety.血流限制训练:方法学、应用及安全性考量
Front Physiol. 2019 May 15;10:533. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2019.00533. eCollection 2019.
9
Non-failure blood flow restricted exercise induces similar muscle adaptations and less discomfort than failure protocols.非失败血流限制运动比失败方案引起相似的肌肉适应和较少的不适。
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2019 Mar;29(3):336-347. doi: 10.1111/sms.13346. Epub 2018 Dec 18.
10
Effects of Blood Flow Restriction Training on Muscular Strength and Hypertrophy in Older Individuals: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.血流限制训练对老年人肌肉力量和肥大的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Sports Med. 2019 Jan;49(1):95-108. doi: 10.1007/s40279-018-0994-1.