• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

血流限制训练期间血管闭塞是否存在最小有效剂量?

Is There a Minimum Effective Dose for Vascular Occlusion During Blood Flow Restriction Training?

作者信息

Das Arpan, Paton Bruce

机构信息

Institute of Sports, Exercise and Health, Department of Medical Sciences, University College of London, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Front Physiol. 2022 Apr 8;13:838115. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2022.838115. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fphys.2022.838115
PMID:35464074
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9024204/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Blood flow restriction (BFR) training at lower exercise intensities has a range of applications, allowing subjects to achieve strength and hypertrophy gains matching those training at high intensity. However, there is no clear consensus on the percentage of limb occlusion pressure [%LOP, expressed as a % of the pressure required to occlude systolic blood pressure (SBP)] and percentage of one repetition max weight (%1RM) required to achieve these results. This review aims to explore what the optimal and minimal combination of LOP and 1RM is for significant results using BFR.

METHOD

A literature search using PubMed, Scopus, Wiley Online, Springer Link, and relevant citations from review papers was performed, and articles assessed for suitability. Original studies using BFR with a resistance training exercise intervention, who chose a set %LOP and %1RM and compared to a non-BFR control were included in this review.

RESULT

Twenty-one studies met the inclusion criteria. %LOP ranged from 40 to 150%. %1RM used ranged from 15 to 80%. Training at 1RM ≤20%, or ≥ 80% did not produce significant strength results compared to controls. Applying %LOP of ≤50% and ≥ 80% did not produce significant strength improvement compared to controls. This may be due to a mechanism mediated by lactate accumulation, which is facilitated by increased training volume and a moderate exercise intensity.

CONCLUSION

Training at a minimum of 30 %1RM with BFR is required for strength gains matching non-BFR high intensity training. Moderate intensity training (40-60%1RM) with BFR may produce results exceeding non-BFR high intensity however the literature is sparse. A %LOP of 50-80% is optimal for BFR training.

摘要

背景

在较低运动强度下进行血流限制(BFR)训练有一系列应用,能使受试者获得与高强度训练相当的力量增长和肌肉肥大效果。然而,对于肢体闭塞压力百分比[%LOP,以闭塞收缩压(SBP)所需压力的百分比表示]以及实现这些结果所需的一次重复最大重量百分比(%1RM),目前尚无明确共识。本综述旨在探讨使用BFR获得显著效果时,LOP和1RM的最佳及最小组合是什么。

方法

使用PubMed、Scopus、Wiley Online、Springer Link进行文献检索,并检索综述论文的相关参考文献,对文章进行适用性评估。本综述纳入了使用BFR并进行抗阻训练运动干预的原始研究,这些研究选择了设定的%LOP和%1RM,并与非BFR对照组进行比较。

结果

21项研究符合纳入标准。%LOP范围为40%至150%。使用的%1RM范围为15%至80%。与对照组相比,在1RM≤20%或≥80%下训练未产生显著的力量增长。与对照组相比,应用≤50%和≥80%的%LOP未产生显著的力量改善。这可能是由于乳酸积累介导的一种机制,训练量增加和适度运动强度会促进乳酸积累。

结论

使用BFR训练时,要获得与非BFR高强度训练相当的力量增长,至少需要30%1RM。BFR进行中等强度训练(40 - 60%1RM)可能产生超过非BFR高强度训练的效果,然而相关文献较少。50 - 80%的%LOP最适合BFR训练。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df09/9024204/bdd2d6d4fe8e/fphys-13-838115-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df09/9024204/5e5b5d8a8a76/fphys-13-838115-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df09/9024204/9d8eda5794ca/fphys-13-838115-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df09/9024204/e8f9168671b0/fphys-13-838115-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df09/9024204/7fa05a8f8485/fphys-13-838115-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df09/9024204/b8c476f78fac/fphys-13-838115-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df09/9024204/bdd2d6d4fe8e/fphys-13-838115-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df09/9024204/5e5b5d8a8a76/fphys-13-838115-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df09/9024204/9d8eda5794ca/fphys-13-838115-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df09/9024204/e8f9168671b0/fphys-13-838115-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df09/9024204/7fa05a8f8485/fphys-13-838115-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df09/9024204/b8c476f78fac/fphys-13-838115-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df09/9024204/bdd2d6d4fe8e/fphys-13-838115-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Is There a Minimum Effective Dose for Vascular Occlusion During Blood Flow Restriction Training?血流限制训练期间血管闭塞是否存在最小有效剂量?
Front Physiol. 2022 Apr 8;13:838115. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2022.838115. eCollection 2022.
2
Effects of low-load blood flow restriction on the venous system in comparison to traditional low-load and high-load exercises.与传统低负荷和高负荷运动相比,低负荷血流限制对静脉系统的影响。
Front Physiol. 2023 Dec 15;14:1285462. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2023.1285462. eCollection 2023.
3
Training response to 8 weeks of blood flow restricted training is not improved by preferentially altering tissue hypoxia or lactate accumulation when training to repetition failure.在以重复力竭为训练目标时,通过优先改变组织缺氧或乳酸堆积来改善血流限制训练 8 周的训练反应是无效的。
Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2021 Oct;46(10):1257-1264. doi: 10.1139/apnm-2020-1056. Epub 2021 Apr 30.
4
Acute cellular and molecular responses and chronic adaptations to low-load blood flow restriction and high-load resistance exercise in trained individuals.在训练有素的个体中,低负荷血流限制和高负荷抗阻运动的急性细胞和分子反应及慢性适应。
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2021 Dec 1;131(6):1731-1749. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00464.2021. Epub 2021 Sep 23.
5
Acute Effects of Resistance Exercise With Continuous and Intermittent Blood Flow Restriction on Hemodynamic Measurements and Perceived Exertion.持续和间歇性血流限制的抗阻运动对血流动力学测量和主观用力感觉的急性影响。
Percept Mot Skills. 2017 Feb;124(1):277-292. doi: 10.1177/0031512516677900. Epub 2016 Nov 13.
6
Comparisons between low-intensity resistance training with blood flow restriction and high-intensity resistance training on quadriceps muscle mass and strength in elderly.老年人群中,低强度血流限制阻力训练与高强度阻力训练对股四头肌肌肉量和力量影响的比较。
J Strength Cond Res. 2015 Apr;29(4):1071-6. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000000703.
7
Blood Flow Restriction Does Not Attenuate Short-Term Detraining-Induced Muscle Size and Strength Losses After Resistance Training With Blood Flow Restriction.血流限制并不能减轻血流限制阻力训练后短期停训引起的肌肉大小和力量损失。
J Strength Cond Res. 2021 Aug 1;35(8):2082-2088. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000003148.
8
Blood Flow Restriction Training in Clinical Rehabilitation: Occlusion Pressure Methods Relative to the Limb Occlusion Pressure.血流限制训练在临床康复中的应用:肢体闭塞压力相关的闭塞压力方法。
J Sport Rehabil. 2023 Jan 14;32(4):361-368. doi: 10.1123/jsr.2022-0240. Print 2023 May 1.
9
Effects on the Profile of Circulating miRNAs after Single Bouts of Resistance Training with and without Blood Flow Restriction-A Three-Arm, Randomized Crossover Trial.抗阻训练联合与不联合血流限制对循环 miRNA 谱的影响:一项三臂、随机交叉试验。
Int J Mol Sci. 2019 Jul 2;20(13):3249. doi: 10.3390/ijms20133249.
10
The Effects of Blood Flow Restriction on Upper-Body Musculature Located Distal and Proximal to Applied Pressure.血流限制对施加压力部位的近心端和远心端的上半身肌肉的影响。
Sports Med. 2016 Jan;46(1):23-33. doi: 10.1007/s40279-015-0407-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Methodological Approach to Predicting Lower Limb Blood Flow Restriction Pressure Using Anthropometry and Hemodynamics.利用人体测量学和血流动力学预测下肢血流限制压力的方法学途径。
Life (Basel). 2025 Aug 11;15(8):1267. doi: 10.3390/life15081267.
2
Comparative analysis of high-intensity resistance training and blood flow restriction training on enhancing upper limb muscle strength and mass.高强度抗阻训练与血流限制训练对增强上肢肌肉力量和肌肉量的比较分析。
Front Physiol. 2025 Jul 7;16:1568616. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2025.1568616. eCollection 2025.
3
The effect of blood flow restriction combined with neuromuscular electrical stimulation on knee joint function: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Men exhibit faster skeletal muscle tissue desaturation than women before and after a fatiguing handgrip.男性在疲劳性握力前后的骨骼肌组织饱和度下降速度快于女性。
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2021 Dec;121(12):3473-3483. doi: 10.1007/s00421-021-04810-5. Epub 2021 Sep 13.
2
Similar Morphological and Functional Training Adaptations Occur Between Continuous and Intermittent Blood Flow Restriction.连续和间歇性血流限制之间存在相似的形态和功能训练适应性。
J Strength Cond Res. 2021 Jul 1;35(7):1784-1793. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000004034.
3
Contralateral training effects of low-intensity blood-flow restricted and high-intensity unilateral resistance training.
血流限制联合神经肌肉电刺激对膝关节功能的影响:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
J Orthop. 2025 May 5;65:155-166. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2025.05.012. eCollection 2025 Jul.
4
Blood flow restriction combined with resistance training on muscle strength and thickness improvement in young adults: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression.血流限制联合阻力训练对年轻人肌肉力量和厚度改善的影响:一项系统评价、荟萃分析和元回归分析
Front Physiol. 2024 Aug 12;15:1379605. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2024.1379605. eCollection 2024.
5
Commentary: Is there a minimum effective dose for vascular occlusion during blood flow restriction training?评论:血流限制训练期间血管闭塞是否存在最小有效剂量?
Front Physiol. 2023 Oct 2;14:1279435. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2023.1279435. eCollection 2023.
6
Comparing low volume of blood flow restricted to high-intensity resistance training of the finger flexors to maintain climbing-specific strength and endurance: a crossover study.比较低血流量限制与高强度手指屈肌抗阻训练以维持攀岩特定力量和耐力:一项交叉研究。
Front Sports Act Living. 2023 Sep 29;5:1256136. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2023.1256136. eCollection 2023.
7
Clinic and Home-Based Exercise with Blood Flow Restriction Resolves Thigh Muscle Atrophy after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with the Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Autograft: A Case Report.基于诊所和家庭的血流限制运动可解决自体骨-髌腱-骨前交叉韧带重建术后的大腿肌肉萎缩:一例报告
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Jun 29;11(13):1885. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11131885.
8
Acute effects of low load blood flow restricted and non restricted exercise on muscle excitation, neuromuscular efficiency, and average torque.低负荷血流限制和非限制运动对肌肉兴奋、神经肌肉效率和平均扭矩的急性影响。
J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact. 2023 Jun 1;23(2):165-174.
9
Neuromuscular Responses to Failure vs Non-Failure During Blood Flow Restriction Training in Untrained Females.未经训练的女性在血流限制训练期间对疲劳与非疲劳的神经肌肉反应。
Int J Exerc Sci. 2023 Feb 1;16(1):293-303. doi: 10.70252/VBYY9439. eCollection 2023.
10
Blood flow restriction added to usual care exercise in patients with early weight bearing restrictions after cartilage or meniscus repair in the knee joint: a feasibility study.膝关节软骨或半月板修复后早期负重受限患者在常规护理锻炼中增加血流限制:一项可行性研究。
J Exp Orthop. 2022 Oct 4;9(1):101. doi: 10.1186/s40634-022-00533-4.
低强度血流限制和高强度单侧抗阻训练的对侧训练效应。
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2021 Aug;121(8):2305-2321. doi: 10.1007/s00421-021-04708-2. Epub 2021 May 12.
4
The influence of compressive gear on maximal load lifted in competitive powerlifting.压缩装备对竞技力量举中最大举重负荷的影响。
Biol Sport. 2020 Dec;37(4):437-441. doi: 10.5114/biolsport.2021.100145. Epub 2020 Oct 21.
5
Low-intensity blood flow restriction calf muscle training leads to similar functional and structural adaptations than conventional low-load strength training: A randomized controlled trial.低强度血流限制小腿肌肉训练与传统低负荷力量训练引起相似的功能和结构适应性:一项随机对照试验。
PLoS One. 2020 Jun 30;15(6):e0235377. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235377. eCollection 2020.
6
The Acute Effects of External Compression With Blood Flow Restriction on Maximal Strength and Strength-Endurance Performance of the Upper Limbs.血流限制下外部加压对上肢最大力量和力量耐力表现的急性影响。
Front Physiol. 2020 Jun 10;11:567. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2020.00567. eCollection 2020.
7
Is there rationale for the cuff pressures prescribed for blood flow restriction exercise? A systematic review.血流限制训练中袖带压力的设定有理论依据吗?一项系统综述。
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2020 Aug;30(8):1318-1336. doi: 10.1111/sms.13676. Epub 2020 Apr 27.
8
Acute Physiological Responses to Resistance Exercise With Continuous Versus Intermittent Blood Flow Restriction: A Randomized Controlled Trial.持续与间歇性血流限制的抗阻运动的急性生理反应:一项随机对照试验
Front Physiol. 2020 Mar 17;11:132. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2020.00132. eCollection 2020.
9
Low-load blood flow restriction elicits greater concentric strength than non-blood flow restriction resistance training but similar isometric strength and muscle size.低负荷血流限制训练比非血流限制抗阻训练引起更大的向心力量,但等长力量和肌肉大小相似。
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2020 Feb;120(2):425-441. doi: 10.1007/s00421-019-04287-3. Epub 2019 Dec 17.
10
The Safety of Blood Flow Restriction Training as a Therapeutic Intervention for Patients With Musculoskeletal Disorders: A Systematic Review.血流限制训练作为一种治疗肌肉骨骼疾病患者的治疗干预措施的安全性:系统评价。
Am J Sports Med. 2020 Jun;48(7):1773-1785. doi: 10.1177/0363546519882652. Epub 2019 Nov 11.