Suppr超能文献

血流限制训练期间血管闭塞是否存在最小有效剂量?

Is There a Minimum Effective Dose for Vascular Occlusion During Blood Flow Restriction Training?

作者信息

Das Arpan, Paton Bruce

机构信息

Institute of Sports, Exercise and Health, Department of Medical Sciences, University College of London, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Front Physiol. 2022 Apr 8;13:838115. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2022.838115. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Blood flow restriction (BFR) training at lower exercise intensities has a range of applications, allowing subjects to achieve strength and hypertrophy gains matching those training at high intensity. However, there is no clear consensus on the percentage of limb occlusion pressure [%LOP, expressed as a % of the pressure required to occlude systolic blood pressure (SBP)] and percentage of one repetition max weight (%1RM) required to achieve these results. This review aims to explore what the optimal and minimal combination of LOP and 1RM is for significant results using BFR.

METHOD

A literature search using PubMed, Scopus, Wiley Online, Springer Link, and relevant citations from review papers was performed, and articles assessed for suitability. Original studies using BFR with a resistance training exercise intervention, who chose a set %LOP and %1RM and compared to a non-BFR control were included in this review.

RESULT

Twenty-one studies met the inclusion criteria. %LOP ranged from 40 to 150%. %1RM used ranged from 15 to 80%. Training at 1RM ≤20%, or ≥ 80% did not produce significant strength results compared to controls. Applying %LOP of ≤50% and ≥ 80% did not produce significant strength improvement compared to controls. This may be due to a mechanism mediated by lactate accumulation, which is facilitated by increased training volume and a moderate exercise intensity.

CONCLUSION

Training at a minimum of 30 %1RM with BFR is required for strength gains matching non-BFR high intensity training. Moderate intensity training (40-60%1RM) with BFR may produce results exceeding non-BFR high intensity however the literature is sparse. A %LOP of 50-80% is optimal for BFR training.

摘要

背景

在较低运动强度下进行血流限制(BFR)训练有一系列应用,能使受试者获得与高强度训练相当的力量增长和肌肉肥大效果。然而,对于肢体闭塞压力百分比[%LOP,以闭塞收缩压(SBP)所需压力的百分比表示]以及实现这些结果所需的一次重复最大重量百分比(%1RM),目前尚无明确共识。本综述旨在探讨使用BFR获得显著效果时,LOP和1RM的最佳及最小组合是什么。

方法

使用PubMed、Scopus、Wiley Online、Springer Link进行文献检索,并检索综述论文的相关参考文献,对文章进行适用性评估。本综述纳入了使用BFR并进行抗阻训练运动干预的原始研究,这些研究选择了设定的%LOP和%1RM,并与非BFR对照组进行比较。

结果

21项研究符合纳入标准。%LOP范围为40%至150%。使用的%1RM范围为15%至80%。与对照组相比,在1RM≤20%或≥80%下训练未产生显著的力量增长。与对照组相比,应用≤50%和≥80%的%LOP未产生显著的力量改善。这可能是由于乳酸积累介导的一种机制,训练量增加和适度运动强度会促进乳酸积累。

结论

使用BFR训练时,要获得与非BFR高强度训练相当的力量增长,至少需要30%1RM。BFR进行中等强度训练(40 - 60%1RM)可能产生超过非BFR高强度训练的效果,然而相关文献较少。50 - 80%的%LOP最适合BFR训练。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df09/9024204/5e5b5d8a8a76/fphys-13-838115-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验