Oreskovic Nicolas M, Li Celina, Erwin Ann E
Departments of Internal Medicine and Pediatrics, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
SAGE Open Nurs. 2023 Apr 25;9:23779608231172655. doi: 10.1177/23779608231172655. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
Sedentary work is associated with poor health outcomes. Many healthcare occupations, including office-based care coordination, are largely sedentary. Many nurses do not achieve the recommended levels of daily physical activity, however, the physical activity levels among nurses working in care coordination are not known.
To assess the physical activity levels, self-reported health and well-being, overall quality of life, and work-related satisfaction of office-based care coordinators, and compare these among nursing and non-nursing staff.
This study collected objective physical activity data using accelerometry along with self-reported information on work-related quality of life and satisfaction from 42 healthcare staff working in a hospital-affiliated office-based care coordination program. Results were compared among nursing and non-nursing staff.
Nurses had lower moderate-to-vigorous physical activity levels compared to non-nursing staff (25 min/day vs. 45, = .007). There were no differences in daily sedentary time, light activity, or steps between nursing and non-nursing staff. Nurses reported high quality of life scores compared to non-nursing staff (4.4 vs. 4.1, = .02), but similar levels of work-related quality of life, happiness, self-rated health, and well-being.
Nurses working in an office-based care coordination program had lower levels of physical activity but reported a higher overall quality of life than non-nurse work colleagues working in a similar environment. Given known health risks associated with sedentary occupational work and the growing number of care coordination programs, health policies and initiatives aimed at increasing the physical activity levels of care coordination workers is of prime importance.
久坐不动的工作与不良健康后果相关。许多医疗保健职业,包括基于办公室的护理协调工作,大多需要久坐。许多护士未达到建议的每日身体活动水平,然而,从事护理协调工作的护士的身体活动水平尚不清楚。
评估基于办公室的护理协调员的身体活动水平、自我报告的健康状况和幸福感、总体生活质量以及与工作相关的满意度,并在护理人员和非护理人员之间进行比较。
本研究使用加速度计收集客观的身体活动数据,以及来自一家医院附属的基于办公室的护理协调项目的42名医护人员的与工作相关的生活质量和满意度的自我报告信息。对护理人员和非护理人员的结果进行了比较。
与非护理人员相比,护士的中度至剧烈身体活动水平较低(25分钟/天对45分钟/天,P = 0.007)。护理人员和非护理人员在每日久坐时间、轻度活动或步数方面没有差异。与非护理人员相比,护士报告的生活质量得分较高(4.4对4.1,P = 0.02),但在与工作相关的生活质量、幸福感、自我健康评分和整体健康状况方面水平相似。
在基于办公室的护理协调项目中工作的护士身体活动水平较低,但报告的总体生活质量高于在类似环境中工作的非护士同事。鉴于已知与久坐职业工作相关的健康风险以及护理协调项目的数量不断增加,旨在提高护理协调工作人员身体活动水平的健康政策和举措至关重要。