School of Medicine and Health Management, Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, China.
Pharmaceutical Economic Management Research Center, Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, China.
Front Public Health. 2023 Apr 13;11:1137692. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1137692. eCollection 2023.
This study aimed to elucidate the impact of media trust on epidemic prevention motivation and behaviors based on the Protection Motivation Theory (PMT) and to evaluate the moderation effect of personal epidemic experience, which focused on the differences in two groups with or without epidemic experience.
The exogenous constructs and PMT model and scale were constructed through literature analysis, and a web-based questionnaire survey was conducted among 428 individuals aged above 18 years in China. Statistical analysis and hypothesis testing were performed in SPSS 26 and SmartPLS 3.
Traditional media trust accounted for the largest weight in media trust (w = 0.492, -value < 0.001), followed by social media (w = 0.463, -value < 0.001), and interpersonal communication (w = 0.290, -value < 0.001). Media trust was positively and significantly related to both threat appraisal (β = 0.210, -value < 0.001) and coping appraisal (β = 0.260, -value < 0.001). Threat appraisal (β = 0.105, -value < 0.05) and coping appraisal (β = 0.545, -value < 0.001) were positively and significantly related to epidemic prevention motivation, which positively and significantly related to epidemic prevention behaviors (β = 0.492, -value < 0.001). The R values of epidemic prevention motivation and behavior are 0.350 and 0.240, respectively, indicating an acceptable explanation. Multiple-group analysis revealed five significant differences in paths between the two groups, indicating personal epidemic experience acting as a slight moderator on these paths.
Traditional media trust and social media trust were the important elements in COVID-19 prevention and control, and public health departments and governments should ensure the accuracy and reliability of information from traditional and social media. Simultaneously, the media should balance threat information and efficacy information in order to generate the public's prevention motivation and behaviors.
本研究旨在基于保护动机理论(PMT)阐明媒体信任对防疫动机和行为的影响,并评估个人疫情经验的调节作用,重点关注有和没有疫情经验的两组之间的差异。
通过文献分析构建外生构念和 PMT 模型和量表,在中国对 428 名 18 岁以上的个体进行了基于网络的问卷调查。在 SPSS 26 和 SmartPLS 3 中进行统计分析和假设检验。
传统媒体信任在媒体信任中占比最大(w=0.492,-值<0.001),其次是社交媒体(w=0.463,-值<0.001)和人际传播(w=0.290,-值<0.001)。媒体信任与威胁评估(β=0.210,-值<0.001)和应对评估(β=0.260,-值<0.001)均呈正显著相关。威胁评估(β=0.105,-值<0.05)和应对评估(β=0.545,-值<0.001)与防疫动机呈正显著相关,防疫动机与防疫行为呈正显著相关(β=0.492,-值<0.001)。防疫动机和行为的 R 值分别为 0.350 和 0.240,表明解释度尚可。多组分析显示,两组之间的五条路径存在五个显著差异,表明个人疫情经验对这些路径起到了轻微的调节作用。
传统媒体信任和社交媒体信任是 COVID-19 防控的重要因素,公共卫生部门和政府应确保传统和社交媒体信息的准确性和可靠性。同时,媒体应平衡威胁信息和效能信息,以激发公众的防疫动机和行为。