Suppr超能文献

骨移植法与体外冲击波治疗长骨假关节的临床疗效比较。

Clinical Results of Decortication with Bone Grafting Method versus Extracorporeal Shock Wave Treatment in Long-Bone Pseudoarthrosis.

机构信息

Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine, Van Yüzüncü Yıl University, Van, Turkey.

Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Ankara Keçiören Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

Med Sci Monit. 2023 May 2;29:e939395. doi: 10.12659/MSM.939395.

Abstract

BACKGROUND Despite advanced treatment methods, the treatment of pseudoarthrosis still poses a significant challenge for orthopedists. In this study, we aimed to assess the clinical results of decortication and bone grafting and extracorporeal shock wave treatment (ESWT) in long-bone pseudoarthrosis. MATERIAL AND METHODS Between 2007 and 2015, 68 fractures of 66 patients treated for long-bone pseudoarthrosis were evaluated retrospectively. ESWT was used in 36 extremities and decortication and iliac bone grafting was used in 32. The treatment results of these patients were evaluated and compared with rates in the literature. RESULTS The mean patient age was 43.9 years (range, 21-69). The mean interval between the occurrence of the fracture and treatment with bone grafting or ESWT was 8.6 months and the mean interval between the procedure and achievement of union was 6.9 months. The patients were followed up for a mean period of 25.2 months. After the mean follow-up period, bone union had occurred in all 32 patients (100%) in the decortication and bone grafting group and in 28 (78%) of the 36 patients in the ESWT group (P=0.023). CONCLUSIONS This study shows that extracorporeal shock wave treatment should be considered the first option in treatment of pseudoarthrosis as it is a non-invasive method and also provides good rates of union. In patients that do not heal with ESWT, decortication and bone grafting remains the criterion standard therapy.

摘要

背景

尽管治疗方法先进,但假关节的治疗仍然是骨科医生面临的重大挑战。在本研究中,我们旨在评估皮质骨切除术和植骨术以及体外冲击波治疗(ESWT)在长骨假关节中的临床效果。

材料与方法

2007 年至 2015 年,回顾性评估了 66 例患者的 68 处长骨假关节骨折。36 处肢体采用 ESWT 治疗,32 处采用皮质骨切除术和髂骨植骨术治疗。评估并比较了这些患者的治疗结果与文献中的比率。

结果

患者的平均年龄为 43.9 岁(范围,21-69 岁)。骨折发生与植骨或 ESWT 治疗之间的平均间隔为 8.6 个月,手术与愈合之间的平均间隔为 6.9 个月。患者的平均随访时间为 25.2 个月。平均随访后,皮质骨切除术和植骨组的 32 例患者(100%)和 ESWT 组的 36 例患者中的 28 例(78%)均发生骨愈合(P=0.023)。

结论

本研究表明,体外冲击波治疗应该被视为治疗假关节的首选方法,因为它是一种非侵入性方法,并且也提供了良好的愈合率。在 ESWT 治疗无效的患者中,皮质骨切除术和植骨术仍然是标准的治疗方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5dad/10163828/e5c3581cf0c5/medscimonit-29-e939395-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验