Suppr超能文献

骨移植替代物在大骨缺损中的应用:有特殊需求吗?

The use of bone-graft substitutes in large bone defects: any specific needs?

机构信息

COR, Orthopaedic Institute, G Pini, University of Milan, Italy.

出版信息

Injury. 2011 Sep;42 Suppl 2:S56-63. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2011.06.011. Epub 2011 Jul 12.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The gold standard for restoring bone defects is still considered to be autologous bone grafting. However, clinical benefits are not guaranteed and donor-site complications and morbidity is not infrequent. Research is on-going for the development of alternative bone substitutes of both biological and synthetic origin. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the type of materials used and their efficacy for the treatment of large bone defects in traumatology and orthopaedic surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHOD

A literature review was carried out of Embase and PubMed databases. Inclusion criteria were articles in English language focusing on the use of bone substitutes in trauma and orthopaedic surgery for the treatment of bone defects and included details on the structural, biological or biomechanical properties of the pure product. Furthermore, based on two clinical challenges, fracture non-union and impaction grafting we elaborated on the use of polytherapy for large bone defects as guided by the diamond concept.

RESULTS

All the products indicated in this manuscript possess osteoconductive activities but have different resorption times and biomechanical properties. Bone graft substitute materials are used for a wide range of clinical applications even when the level of clinical evidence is low. The size and location of the defect and the local biological and mechanical environment as well as the biomechanical characteristics of the material determine the type of device that can be implanted in a bone defect.

CONCLUSION

Proper assessment of the biological and mechanical environment and accurate patient selection are necessary to judge the extent of therapy the injury warrants. A sound understanding of various aspects of biomaterial properties and their relation and influence towards bone healing is of utmost importance. We suggest the application of polytherapy for the treatment of large bone defects and advocate the use of the diamond concept as a guideline.

摘要

简介

修复骨缺损的金标准仍被认为是自体骨移植。然而,临床获益并不能得到保证,且供区并发症和发病率并不少见。目前正在研究开发具有生物和合成来源的替代骨替代品。本研究旨在评估用于创伤和矫形外科治疗大骨缺损的材料类型及其疗效。

材料与方法

对 Embase 和 PubMed 数据库进行文献回顾。纳入标准为关注创伤和矫形外科中使用骨替代物治疗骨缺损的英文文章,并详细介绍纯产品的结构、生物学或生物力学特性。此外,基于骨折不愈合和打压植骨这两个临床挑战,我们根据钻石概念详细阐述了多疗法在大骨缺损治疗中的应用。

结果

本文中提到的所有产品都具有骨诱导活性,但吸收时间和生物力学性能不同。即使临床证据水平较低,骨移植替代物材料也可用于广泛的临床应用。缺损的大小和位置、局部生物和机械环境以及材料的生物力学特性决定了可以植入骨缺损的器械类型。

结论

正确评估生物和机械环境以及准确选择患者对于判断损伤所需的治疗程度是必要的。充分了解生物材料特性的各个方面及其与骨愈合的关系和影响至关重要。我们建议对大骨缺损采用多疗法治疗,并提倡将钻石概念用作指导原则。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验