Rheumatology Department, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain.
Department of Rheumatology, IRCCS-S.Maria Nuova, Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2024 Jan 4;63(1):158-164. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kead189.
The main objective of this study was to analyse the prevalence and characteristics of subclinical GCA in patients with PMR.
This was a cross-sectional multicentre international study of consecutive patients with newly diagnosed PMR without symptoms or signs suggestive of GCA. All patients underwent US of the temporal superficial, common carotid, subclavian and axillary arteries. Patients with halo signs in at least one examined artery were considered to have subclinical GCA. The clinical, demographic and laboratory characteristics of the PMR group without subclinical vasculitis were compared with subclinical GCA, and the pattern of vessel involvement was compared with that of a classical single-centre GCA cohort.
We included 346 PMR patients, 267 (77.2%) without subclinical GCA and 79 (22.8%) with subclinical GCA. The PMR patients with subclinical GCA were significantly older, had a longer duration of morning stiffness and more frequently reported hip pain than PMR without subclinical GCA. PMR with subclinical GCA showed a predominant extracranial large vessel pattern of vasculitic involvement compared with classical GCA, where the cranial phenotype predominated. The patients with PMR in the classical GCA group showed a pattern of vessel involvement similar to classical GCA without PMR but different from PMR with subclinical involvement.
More than a fifth of the pure PMR patients had US findings consistent with subclinical GCA. This specific subset of patients showed a predilection for extracranial artery involvement. The optimal screening strategy to assess the presence of vasculitis in PMR remains to be determined.
本研究的主要目的是分析 PMR 患者亚临床 GCA 的患病率和特征。
这是一项针对新诊断为 PMR 且无 GCA 症状或体征的连续患者的横断面多中心国际研究。所有患者均接受颞浅动脉、颈总动脉、锁骨下动脉和腋动脉的超声检查。至少在一条检查动脉中存在 halo 征的患者被认为患有亚临床 GCA。将无亚临床血管炎的 PMR 组的临床、人口统计学和实验室特征与亚临床 GCA 进行比较,并将血管受累模式与经典单中心 GCA 队列进行比较。
我们纳入了 346 例 PMR 患者,其中 267 例(77.2%)无亚临床 GCA,79 例(22.8%)有亚临床 GCA。亚临床 GCA 的 PMR 患者年龄明显更大,晨僵时间更长,髋关节疼痛更频繁,与无亚临床 GCA 的 PMR 患者相比。与经典 GCA 相比,PMR 伴亚临床 GCA 表现为以颅外大血管受累为主的血管炎受累模式,而经典 GCA 以颅内表型为主。经典 GCA 组中的 PMR 患者的血管受累模式与无 PMR 的经典 GCA 相似,但与 PMR 伴亚临床受累不同。
超过五分之一的单纯 PMR 患者的超声检查结果符合亚临床 GCA。这一特定亚组患者表现出对颅外动脉受累的倾向。评估 PMR 中血管炎存在的最佳筛查策略仍有待确定。