Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Arizona, USA.
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2023 Aug 28;78(9):1501-1510. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbad067.
This study examines cross-over, time-lagged (cross-lagged) effects of nonintervened changes between mobility limitations and control constraints/self-mastery.
Using the Health and Retirement Study data from the years 2006 to 2016 from 10,690 participants, changes in mobility limitations, control constraints, and self-mastery were analyzed simultaneously with 3 latent change score models, to account for measurement error and pre-existing mobility issues prior to baseline.
An increase in mobility limitations predicts a decrease in mastery observed in the next interval, but not the other way around. Cross-lagged effects of changes are significant only between control and local mobility limitations concerning upper/lower extremity and associated large muscles.
The results indicate reciprocity between perceived control constraints and local mobility regardless of pre-existing limitations. To better facilitate recovery and prevention, future intervention designs should consider alleviating control constraints in addition to improving self-mastery.
本研究考察了行动受限与控制约束/自我掌控之间未经干预的变化之间的交叉滞后(交叉滞后)效应。
使用来自 2006 年至 2016 年的 10690 名参与者的健康与退休研究数据,通过 3 个潜在变化得分模型同时分析行动受限、控制约束和自我掌控的变化,以解释测量误差和基线前预先存在的行动问题。
行动受限的增加预示着在下一个间隔内观察到的掌握力下降,但反之则不然。仅在控制和局部行动受限(涉及上肢/下肢和相关大肌肉)之间存在变化的交叉滞后效应。
结果表明,无论预先存在的限制如何,感知控制约束与局部行动受限之间存在相互关系。为了更好地促进恢复和预防,未来的干预设计应考虑缓解控制约束,除了提高自我掌控力。