• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

竖脊肌神经阻滞在腰椎手术后疼痛控制中的疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Efficacy of erector spinae nerve block for pain control after lumbar spinal surgeries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, The Affiliated Nanhua Hospital, Hengyang Medical School, University of South China, Hengyang, China.

出版信息

Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2023 Apr;27(8):3383-3395. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_202304_32109.

DOI:10.26355/eurrev_202304_32109
PMID:37140288
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The review aimed to examine the evidence on the efficacy of erector spinae nerve block (ESPB) for pain control after lumbar spinal surgeries.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

PubMed, CENTRAL, Embase, and Web of Science were examined for published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing ESPB with control for lumbar spinal surgery patients. The primary review outcome was 24-hour total opioid consumption in morphine equivalents. The secondary review outcomes were pain at rest at 4-6 hours, 8-12 hours, 24 hours and 48 hours, first rescue analgesic timing, needing rescue analgesics number, and postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV).

RESULTS

16 trials were eligible. Total opioid consumption was significantly lower with ESPB as compared to controls (MD: -12.68 95% CI: -18.09, -7.28 I2=99% p<0.00001). Pain scores at 4-6 hours (MD: -1.37 95% CI: -1.98, -0.76 I2=95% p<0.0001), 8-12 hours (MD: -1.18 95% CI:-1.84, -0.52 I2=98% p=0.0004), 24 hours (MD: -0.53 95% CI:-1.03, -0.04 I2=96% p=0.04) and 48 hours (MD: -0.36 95% CI:-0.84, 0.13 I2=88% p=0.15) were significantly lower in the ESPB group. The meta-analysis found that the ESPB group required a significantly longer time for the first analgesic request (MD: 5.26 95% CI: 2.53, 7.99 I2=100% p=0.002), had lower demand for rescue analgesics (OR: 0.12 95% CI: 0.07, 0.21 I2=2% p<0.00001) and fewer incidence of PONV (OR: 0.27 95% CI: 0.15, 0.49 I2=51% p<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

ESPB can be highly efficacious for postoperative analgesia in lumbar surgery patients. The block has the capability of reducing opioid consumption in the first 24 hours and pain scores up to 48 hours along with a significant reduction in the need for rescue analgesics and PONV.

摘要

目的

本次综述旨在研究竖脊肌神经阻滞(ESPB)在腰椎手术后疼痛控制方面的疗效证据。

材料和方法

检索 PubMed、CENTRAL、Embase 和 Web of Science 中评估 ESPB 与腰椎脊柱手术患者对照的已发表随机对照试验(RCT)。主要综述结果为吗啡等效物 24 小时内的总阿片类药物消耗量。次要综述结果为术后 4-6 小时、8-12 小时、24 小时和 48 小时的静息疼痛评分、首次解救性镇痛时间、需要解救性镇痛的次数以及术后恶心呕吐(PONV)。

结果

16 项试验符合纳入标准。与对照组相比,ESPB 组的总阿片类药物消耗量明显降低(MD:-12.68,95%CI:-18.09,-7.28,I2=99%,p<0.00001)。术后 4-6 小时(MD:-1.37,95%CI:-1.98,-0.76,I2=95%,p<0.0001)、8-12 小时(MD:-1.18,95%CI:-1.84,-0.52,I2=98%,p=0.0004)、24 小时(MD:-0.53,95%CI:-1.03,-0.04,I2=96%,p=0.04)和 48 小时(MD:-0.36,95%CI:-0.84,0.13,I2=88%,p=0.15)的疼痛评分明显降低。荟萃分析发现,ESPB 组首次请求镇痛的时间明显延长(MD:5.26,95%CI:2.53,7.99,I2=100%,p=0.002),对解救性镇痛的需求降低(OR:0.12,95%CI:0.07,0.21,I2=2%,p<0.00001),PONV 的发生率降低(OR:0.27,95%CI:0.15,0.49,I2=51%,p<0.0001)。

结论

ESPB 对腰椎手术患者的术后镇痛非常有效。该阻滞术具有减少术后 24 小时内阿片类药物消耗和疼痛评分的能力,可降低 48 小时内对解救性镇痛的需求和 PONV 的发生率。

相似文献

1
Efficacy of erector spinae nerve block for pain control after lumbar spinal surgeries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.竖脊肌神经阻滞在腰椎手术后疼痛控制中的疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2023 Apr;27(8):3383-3395. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_202304_32109.
2
Postoperative analgesic effects of paravertebral block versus erector spinae plane block for thoracic and breast surgery: A meta-analysis.胸椎和乳腺手术后椎旁阻滞与竖脊肌平面阻滞的术后镇痛效果:一项荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2021 Aug 25;16(8):e0256611. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256611. eCollection 2021.
3
Ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block for postoperative short-term outcomes in lumbar spine surgery: A meta-analysis and systematic review.超声引导竖脊肌平面阻滞用于腰椎手术术后短期结局:荟萃分析和系统评价。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Feb 17;102(7):e32981. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000032981.
4
Analgesic efficacy and safety of erector spinae plane block in pediatric patients undergoing elective surgery: A systematic review and Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.竖脊肌平面阻滞在小儿择期手术中的镇痛效果和安全性:系统评价和随机对照试验的 Meta 分析。
J Clin Anesth. 2024 Nov;98:111575. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2024.111575. Epub 2024 Aug 10.
5
Analgesic efficacy of erector spinae plane block in lumbar spine surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.竖脊肌平面阻滞在腰椎手术中的镇痛效果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Clin Anesth. 2022 Jun;78:110647. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2022.110647. Epub 2022 Jan 11.
6
Analgesic efficacy and safety of erector spinae plane block in breast cancer surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.竖脊肌平面阻滞在乳腺癌手术中的镇痛效果和安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2021 Feb 20;21(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s12871-021-01277-x.
7
Efficacy and Safety of Bilateral Ultrasound-Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Spine Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.双侧超声引导竖脊肌平面阻滞用于脊柱手术后镇痛的疗效和安全性:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
World Neurosurg. 2024 Jan;181:e655-e677. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2023.10.111. Epub 2023 Oct 28.
8
Analgesia efficacy of erector spinae plane block in laparoscopic abdominal surgeries: a systemic review and meta-analysis.竖脊肌平面阻滞在腹腔镜腹部手术中的镇痛效果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Surg. 2024 Jul 1;110(7):4393-4401. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000001421.
9
Ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block for postoperative analgesia in patients after liver surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis on randomized comparative studies.超声引导竖脊肌平面阻滞用于肝手术后患者的术后镇痛:一项随机对照研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Surg. 2022 Jul;103:106689. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2022.106689. Epub 2022 Jun 1.
10
The Effect of Single-Shot Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB) on Opioid Consumption for Various Surgeries: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.单次竖脊肌平面阻滞(ESPB)对各类手术中阿片类药物用量的影响:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析
J Pain Res. 2022 Mar 6;15:683-699. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S346809. eCollection 2022.