Vilcek Institute of Graduate Biomedical Sciences, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, School of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, NY, USA.
Prev Sci. 2024 Apr;25(Suppl 1):56-71. doi: 10.1007/s11121-023-01534-0. Epub 2023 May 5.
Community-clinical linkage models (CCLM) have the potential to reduce health disparities, especially in underserved communities; however, the COVID-19 pandemic drastically impacted their implementation. This paper explores the impact of the pandemic on the implementation of CCLM intervention led by community health workers (CHWs) to address diabetes disparities among South Asian patients in New York City. Guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), 22 stakeholders were interviewed: 7 primary care providers, 7 CHWs, 5 community-based organization (CBO) representatives, and 3 research staff. Semi-structured interviews were conducted; interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed. CFIR constructs guided the identification of barriers and adaptations made across several dimensions of the study's implementation context. We also explored stakeholder-identified adaptations used to mitigate the challenges in the intervention delivery using the Model for Adaptation Design and Impact (MADI) framework. (1) Communication and engagement refers to how stakeholders communicated with participants during the intervention period, including difficulties experienced staying connected with intervention activities during the lockdown. The study team and CHWs developed simple, plain-language guides designed to enhance digital literacy. (2) Intervention/research process describes intervention characteristics and challenges stakeholders faced in implementing components of the intervention during the lockdown. CHWs modified the health curriculum materials delivered remotely to support engagement in the intervention and health promotion. (3) community and implementation context pertains to the social and economic consequences of the lockdown and their effect on intervention implementation. CHWs and CBOs enhanced efforts to provide emotional/mental health support and connected community members to resources to address social needs. Study findings articulate a repository of recommendations for the adaptation of community-delivered programs in under-served communities during a time of public health crises.
社区临床联系模式(CCLM)有可能减少健康差距,尤其是在服务不足的社区;然而,COVID-19 大流行极大地影响了它们的实施。本文探讨了大流行对社区卫生工作者(CHW)领导的 CCLM 干预措施实施的影响,该措施旨在解决纽约市南亚患者的糖尿病差异。在实施研究综合框架(CFIR)的指导下,对 22 名利益相关者进行了访谈:7 名初级保健提供者、7 名 CHW、5 名社区组织(CBO)代表和 3 名研究人员。进行了半结构化访谈;访谈进行了录音和转录。CFIR 结构引导我们识别了研究实施背景的几个维度上的障碍和适应措施。我们还使用适应设计和影响模型(MADI)框架,探讨了利益相关者确定的用于减轻干预提供中挑战的适应措施。(1)沟通和参与是指利益相关者在干预期间与参与者沟通的方式,包括在封锁期间难以保持与干预活动的联系。研究团队和 CHW 开发了简单的、通俗易懂的指南,旨在提高数字素养。(2)干预/研究过程描述了干预的特点和利益相关者在封锁期间实施干预措施组件时面临的挑战。CHW 远程修改了健康课程材料,以支持参与干预和促进健康。(3)社区和实施背景涉及封锁的社会和经济后果及其对干预实施的影响。CHW 和 CBO 加强了提供情感/心理健康支持的努力,并将社区成员与资源联系起来,以满足社会需求。研究结果阐述了在公共卫生危机期间,为在服务不足的社区中实施社区提供的计划提供适应建议的知识库。