University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora.
Colorado School of Public Health, Aurora.
JAMA Health Forum. 2023 May 5;4(5):e230673. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2023.0673.
Prior research has reported undertreatment among patients with cancer who are insured by Medicaid, but this finding may be due, in part, to incomplete data in cancer registries.
To compare disparities in radiation and hormone therapy between women with breast cancer covered by Medicaid and those with private insurance using the Colorado Central Cancer Registry (CCCR) and CCCR data supplemented with All Payer Claims Data (APCD).
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This observational cohort study included women aged 21 to 63 years who received breast cancer surgery. We linked the CCCR and Colorado APCD to identify Medicaid and privately insured women who were newly diagnosed with invasive, nonmetastatic breast cancer between January 1, 2012, and December 31, 2017. In the radiation treatment analysis, we narrowed the sample to women who received breast-conserving surgery (Medicaid, n = 1408; private, n = 1984) and in the hormone therapy analysis, we selected women who were hormone-receptor positive (Medicaid, n = 1156; private, n = 1667).
We used logistic regression to estimate the likelihood of treatment within 12 months to assess whether the results varied between data sources.
There were 3392 and 2823 participants in the radiation and hormone therapy cohorts, respectively. The mean (SD) age was 51.71 (8.30) years in the radiation therapy cohort, and 52.00 (8.16) years in the hormone therapy cohort. Among the participants, there were 140 (4%) and 105 (4%) who were Black non-Hispanic, 499 (15%) and 406 (14%) who were Hispanic, 2602 (77%) and 2190 (78%) were White, and 151 (4%) and 122 (4%) were other/unknown in the radiation and hormone therapy cohorts, respectively. A higher percentage of women were aged 50 years or younger in the Medicaid samples (40% vs 34% in the privately insured sample) and identified as non-Hispanic Black (about 7%) or Hispanic (approximately 24%). Treatment was underreported in both sources, but to a lesser extent in the APCD (2.5% and 2.0% for Medicaid and private insurance, respectively) compared with CCCR (19.5% and 13.3% for Medicaid and private insurance, respectively). Using CCCR data, Women with Medicaid insurance were 4 (95% CI, -8 to -1; P = .02) and 10 (95% CI, -14 to -6; P < .001) percentage points less likely to have a record of radiation and hormone therapy compared with privately insured women, respectively. Using combined CCCR and APCD, no statistically significant disparity was observed in radiation or hormone therapy between Medicaid-insured and privately insured women.
Among women with breast cancer covered by Medicaid vs private insurance, cancer treatment disparities may be overestimated if based solely on cancer registry data.
先前的研究报告称,在有医疗补助保险的癌症患者中存在治疗不足的情况,但这一发现部分可能是由于癌症登记处的数据不完整。
使用科罗拉多州中央癌症登记处(CCCR)和 CCCR 数据补充所有支付者索赔数据(APCD),比较有医疗补助保险和私人保险的乳腺癌女性在接受放射治疗和激素治疗方面的差异。
设计、地点和参与者:这项观察性队列研究纳入了年龄在 21 岁至 63 岁之间接受乳腺癌手术的女性。我们将 CCCR 和科罗拉多州 APCD 进行了链接,以确定在 2012 年 1 月 1 日至 2017 年 12 月 31 日期间新诊断为侵袭性、非转移性乳腺癌的有医疗补助保险和私人保险的女性。在放射治疗分析中,我们将样本缩小到接受保乳手术的女性(医疗补助保险,n=1408;私人保险,n=1984);在激素治疗分析中,我们选择了激素受体阳性的女性(医疗补助保险,n=1156;私人保险,n=1667)。
我们使用逻辑回归来估计在 12 个月内接受治疗的可能性,以评估结果是否因数据源的不同而有所不同。
放射治疗和激素治疗队列的参与者分别为 3392 人和 2823 人。放射治疗队列的平均(SD)年龄为 51.71(8.30)岁,激素治疗队列的平均(SD)年龄为 52.00(8.16)岁。在参与者中,有 140(4%)和 105(4%)人是非西班牙裔黑人,499(15%)和 406(14%)人是西班牙裔,2602(77%)和 2190(78%)人是白人,151(4%)和 122(4%)人是其他/未知种族。在接受医疗补助保险的女性中,年龄在 50 岁或以下的女性比例较高(医疗补助保险组为 40%,私人保险组为 34%),且非西班牙裔黑人(约 7%)或西班牙裔(约 24%)的比例较高。两种数据源都存在治疗报告不足的情况,但 APCD(医疗补助保险分别为 2.5%和 2.0%,私人保险分别为 19.5%和 13.3%)的不足程度低于 CCCR(医疗补助保险分别为 19.5%和 13.3%,私人保险分别为 19.5%和 13.3%)。使用 CCCR 数据,与私人保险的女性相比,有医疗补助保险的女性接受放射治疗和激素治疗的记录分别低 4(95% CI,-8 至-1;P=0.02)和 10(95% CI,-14 至-6;P<0.001)个百分点。使用 CCCR 和 APCD 联合数据,有医疗补助保险和私人保险的女性在放射治疗或激素治疗方面没有观察到统计学显著的差异。
在有医疗补助保险和私人保险的乳腺癌女性中,如果仅基于癌症登记处的数据,癌症治疗的差异可能被高估。