• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医疗保险优势计划和传统医疗保险中高成本癌症药物的使用情况。

High-Cost Cancer Drug Use in Medicare Advantage and Traditional Medicare.

作者信息

Bradley Cathy J, Liang Rifei, Lindrooth Richard C, Sabik Lindsay M, Perraillon Marcelo C

机构信息

Department of Health Systems, Management, and Policy, University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora.

Department of Health Systems, Management, and Policy, Colorado School of Public Health, Aurora.

出版信息

JAMA Health Forum. 2025 Jan 3;6(1):e244868. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.4868.

DOI:10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.4868
PMID:39792400
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11724345/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Medicare Advantage (MA) plans are designed to incentivize the use of less expensive drugs through capitated payments, formulary control, and preauthorizations for certain drugs. These conditions may reduce spending on high-cost therapies for conditions such as cancer, a condition that is among the most expensive to treat.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether patients insured by MA plans receive less high-cost drugs than those insured by traditional Medicare (TM).

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cohort study used data from the linked Colorado All Payer Claims Database and Colorado Central Cancer Registry. This population-based cohort included adults 65 years and older insured by Medicare with prescription coverage who reside in Colorado and were diagnosed with colorectal (CRC) or non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) between January 2012 and December 2021. The data were analyzed between December 2023 and August 2024.

EXPOSURE

Enrollment in TM or MA insurance plans.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Claims for chemotherapy and oral targeted agents were identified. Thresholds for high-cost drugs were based on the distribution of drug costs. Inverse probability weighted logistic regression for receiving any cancer drug and for receiving a high-cost cancer drug was estimated, controlling for patient and ecological characteristics. The sample was stratified by cancer site and local/regional and distant stage.

RESULTS

Of 4240 patients included in the analysis (mean [SD] age, 75 [7] years; 2327 [54.9%] female), 1991 were diagnosed with CRC and 2249 with NSCLC. A total of 1647 patients had local or regional CRC, and 344 had distant CRC; 1351 patients had local or regional NSCLC, and 898 had distant NSCLC. In the covariate-adjusted analysis, patients diagnosed with local or regional CRC who were insured by MA were 6.0 percentage points less likely to receive a cancer drug than similar patients insured by TM. Patients diagnosed with distant NSCLC were 10.0 percentage points less likely to receive a cancer drug if insured by MA. Among patients who received a cancer drug, patients insured by MA were less likely to receive a high-cost drug for local or regional CRC (by 10.0 percentage points) and distant CRC (by 9.0 percentage points).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this cohort study, high-cost drugs were more commonly prescribed among patients enrolled in TM and diagnosed with CRC. A similar pattern was not observed for patients with NSCLC, perhaps because clinical evidence suggests survival benefits to be associated only with certain drugs, all of which are expensive. Nonetheless, MA was modestly associated with reduced high-cost drug utilization and may reduce overall treatment costs.

摘要

重要性

医疗保险优势(MA)计划旨在通过按人头付费、药品目录控制和某些药物的预先授权来激励使用成本较低的药物。这些条件可能会减少用于治疗癌症等疾病的高成本疗法的支出,而癌症是治疗成本最高的疾病之一。

目的

确定参加MA计划的参保患者是否比参加传统医疗保险(TM)的参保患者使用的高成本药物更少。

设计、设置和参与者:这项队列研究使用了科罗拉多州全支付者索赔数据库和科罗拉多州中央癌症登记处的关联数据。这个基于人群的队列包括65岁及以上参加医疗保险且有处方药覆盖的成年人,他们居住在科罗拉多州,在2012年1月至2021年12月期间被诊断患有结直肠癌(CRC)或非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)。数据于2023年12月至2024年8月进行分析。

暴露因素

参加TM或MA保险计划。

主要结局和测量指标

确定化疗和口服靶向药物的索赔。高成本药物的阈值基于药物成本的分布。估计接受任何癌症药物和接受高成本癌症药物的逆概率加权逻辑回归,并控制患者和生态特征。样本按癌症部位以及局部/区域和远处分期进行分层。

结果

在纳入分析的4240名患者中(平均[标准差]年龄为75[7]岁;2327名[54.9%]为女性),1991名被诊断患有CRC,2249名被诊断患有NSCLC。共有1647名患者患有局部或区域CRC,344名患有远处CRC;1351名患者患有局部或区域NSCLC,898名患有远处NSCLC。在协变量调整分析中,被诊断患有局部或区域CRC且参加MA保险的患者比参加TM保险的类似患者接受癌症药物的可能性低6.0个百分点。被诊断患有远处NSCLC且参加MA保险的患者接受癌症药物的可能性低10.0个百分点。在接受癌症药物治疗的患者中,参加MA保险的患者接受局部或区域CRC(低10.0个百分点)和远处CRC(低9.0个百分点)高成本药物的可能性较小。

结论和相关性

在这项队列研究中,参加TM且被诊断患有CRC的患者中更常开具高成本药物。在NSCLC患者中未观察到类似模式,可能是因为临床证据表明生存获益仅与某些药物相关,而所有这些药物都很昂贵。尽管如此,MA与高成本药物使用减少适度相关,可能会降低总体治疗成本。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0dfe/11724345/3e097ef30da7/jamahealthforum-e244868-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0dfe/11724345/3e097ef30da7/jamahealthforum-e244868-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0dfe/11724345/3e097ef30da7/jamahealthforum-e244868-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
High-Cost Cancer Drug Use in Medicare Advantage and Traditional Medicare.医疗保险优势计划和传统医疗保险中高成本癌症药物的使用情况。
JAMA Health Forum. 2025 Jan 3;6(1):e244868. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.4868.
2
Prescribing of low- versus high-cost Part B drugs in Medicare Advantage and traditional Medicare.医疗保险优势计划和传统医疗保险中低成本与高成本B部分药物的处方情况。
Health Serv Res. 2022 Jun;57(3):537-547. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13912. Epub 2021 Dec 14.
3
Resource Use and Care Quality Differences Among Medicare Beneficiaries Undergoing Chemotherapy.接受化疗的 Medicare 受益人之间的资源利用和护理质量差异。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Sep 3;7(9):e2434707. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.34707.
4
Radiotherapy Utilization in Traditional Medicare and Medicare Advantage.传统医疗保险和医疗保险优势计划中的放射治疗使用情况
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Apr 1;8(4):e253018. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.3018.
5
Factors Associated With Use of High-Cost Agents for the Treatment of Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.与转移性非小细胞肺癌治疗中使用高费用药物相关的因素。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2020 Aug 1;112(8):802-809. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djz223.
6
Real-World Costs of Adverse Events in First-Line Treatment of Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.真实世界中转移性非小细胞肺癌一线治疗不良事件的成本。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2020 Jun;26(6):729-740. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2020.26.6.729.
7
Association of Health Insurance Literacy With Enrollment in Traditional Medicare, Medicare Advantage, and Plan Characteristics Within Medicare Advantage.健康保险素养与传统医疗保险、医疗保险优势计划和医疗保险优势计划内计划特征的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Feb 1;5(2):e2146792. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.46792.
8
Quality of Home Health Agencies Serving Traditional Medicare vs Medicare Advantage Beneficiaries.服务传统 Medicare 与 Medicare Advantage 受益人的家庭保健机构的质量。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Sep 4;2(9):e1910622. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.10622.
9
Use and Costs of Supplemental Benefits in Medicare Advantage, 2017-2021.2017 - 2021年医疗保险优势计划中补充福利的使用情况及成本
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jan 2;8(1):e2454699. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.54699.
10
Medicaid Spending in Coordination-Only Dual-Eligible Special Needs Plans.仅协调的双重资格特殊需求计划中的医疗补助支出。
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jan 2;8(1):e2455461. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.55461.

本文引用的文献

1
Medicare Advantage Has Become Notorious for Prior Authorization-CMS and Lawmakers Are Taking Action.医疗保险优势计划因事先授权而声名狼藉——医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心及立法者正在采取行动。
JAMA. 2024 Sep 24;332(12):948-951. doi: 10.1001/jama.2024.13383.
2
First-Line Selpercatinib or Chemotherapy and Pembrolizumab in Fusion-Positive NSCLC.一线塞普替尼或化疗联合帕博利珠单抗治疗融合阳性 NSCLC。
N Engl J Med. 2023 Nov 16;389(20):1839-1850. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2309457. Epub 2023 Oct 21.
3
Evaluation of the Completeness of Managed Care Data to Identify Cancer Diagnoses and Treatments for Patients in the SEER-Medicare Data.
评估管理式医疗数据的完整性,以确定 SEER-医疗保险数据中患者的癌症诊断和治疗情况。
Med Care. 2023 Dec 1;61(12):846-857. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001936. Epub 2023 Oct 4.
4
Treatment Disparities in Radiation and Hormone Therapy Among Women Covered by Medicaid vs Private Insurance in Cancer Registry and Claims Data.在癌症登记和索赔数据中,接受医疗补助和私人保险的女性在放疗和激素治疗方面的差异。
JAMA Health Forum. 2023 May 5;4(5):e230673. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2023.0673.
5
Efficacy and safety of first-line lorlatinib versus crizotinib in patients with advanced, ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer: updated analysis of data from the phase 3, randomised, open-label CROWN study.一线劳拉替尼对比克唑替尼治疗晚期ALK阳性非小细胞肺癌患者的疗效和安全性:3期随机开放标签CROWN研究数据的更新分析
Lancet Respir Med. 2023 Apr;11(4):354-366. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(22)00437-4. Epub 2022 Dec 16.
6
Cancer Treatment Data in Central Cancer Registries: When Are Supplemental Data Needed?中央癌症登记处的癌症治疗数据:何时需要补充数据?
Cancer Inform. 2022 Jul 30;21:11769351221112457. doi: 10.1177/11769351221112457. eCollection 2022.
7
Racial and Ethnic Differences in Rural-Urban Trends in 5-Year Survival of Patients With Lung, Prostate, Breast, and Colorectal Cancers: 1975-2011 Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER).农村-城市地区肺癌、前列腺癌、乳腺癌和结直肠癌患者 5 年生存率的城乡趋势的种族和民族差异:1975-2011 年监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 May 2;5(5):e2212246. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.12246.
8
Implementation of resource use measures in Medicare Advantage.医疗保险优势计划中的资源利用措施的实施。
Health Serv Res. 2022 Aug;57(4):957-962. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13970. Epub 2022 Apr 11.
9
Cancer's Lasting Financial Burden: Evidence From a Longitudinal Assessment.癌症的持久财务负担:来自纵向评估的证据。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2022 Jul 11;114(7):1020-1028. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djac064.
10
Treating the Whole Patient With Cancer: The Critical Importance of Understanding and Addressing the Trajectory of Medical Financial Hardship.全面治疗癌症患者:理解并应对医疗经济困难轨迹的至关重要性。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2022 Mar 8;114(3):335-337. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djab211.