Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA.
Center for Biophysics and Quantitative Biology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA.
Commun Biol. 2023 May 5;6(1):485. doi: 10.1038/s42003-023-04868-1.
Design of cannabinergic subtype selective ligands is challenging because of high sequence and structural similarities of cannabinoid receptors (CB and CB). We hypothesize that the subtype selectivity of designed selective ligands can be explained by the ligand binding to the conformationally distinct states between cannabinoid receptors. Analysis of ~ 700 μs of unbiased simulations using Markov state models and VAMPnets identifies the similarities and distinctions between the activation mechanism of both receptors. Structural and dynamic comparisons of metastable intermediate states allow us to observe the distinction in the binding pocket volume change during CB and CB activation. Docking analysis reveals that only a few of the intermediate metastable states of CB show high affinity towards CB selective agonists. In contrast, all the CB metastable states show a similar affinity for these agonists. These results mechanistically explain the subtype selectivity of these agonists by deciphering the activation mechanism of cannabinoid receptors.
设计大麻素亚型选择性配体具有挑战性,因为大麻素受体(CB1 和 CB2)的序列和结构高度相似。我们假设,设计的选择性配体的亚型选择性可以通过配体与大麻素受体之间构象不同的状态结合来解释。使用马尔可夫状态模型和 VAMPnets 对无偏模拟进行了~700μs 的分析,确定了两种受体的激活机制的相似性和区别。亚稳中间状态的结构和动力学比较使我们能够观察到 CB1 和 CB2 激活过程中结合口袋体积变化的区别。对接分析表明,只有 CB1 的几个中间亚稳状态对 CB1 选择性激动剂显示出高亲和力。相比之下,所有 CB1 的亚稳状态对这些激动剂表现出相似的亲和力。这些结果通过解析大麻素受体的激活机制,从机制上解释了这些激动剂的亚型选择性。