Douglas R G, Waldman R H, Betts R F, Ganguly R
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1979 Feb;15(2):269-72. doi: 10.1128/AAC.15.2.269.
CP-28,888-27 and placebo nasal sprays were compared in 62 normal volunteers challenged with rhinovirus type 13 or 21 in two randomized, double-blind studies. Half of the subjects received CP-28,888-27 and half received nasal placebo administered at 24, 20, and 16 h before challenge and 4 and 8 h after challenge. In each study, the number of subjects shedding virus in nasal washes, the number developing fourfold or greater serum antibody responses, and the number developing afebrile or febrile upper respiratory tract illness were not significantly different comparing subjects given CP-28,888-27 and those given placebo. Interferon was detected in nasal washes from 5 of 15 volunteers tested in the CP-28,888-27 group compared to 2 of 15 volunteers from the placebo group.
在两项随机双盲研究中,对62名感染13型或21型鼻病毒的正常志愿者比较了CP - 28,888 - 27鼻喷雾剂和安慰剂鼻喷雾剂。一半受试者接受CP - 28,888 - 27,另一半在攻击前24、20和16小时以及攻击后4和8小时接受鼻腔安慰剂。在每项研究中,比较接受CP - 28,888 - 27的受试者和接受安慰剂的受试者,鼻腔冲洗液中排出病毒的受试者数量、血清抗体反应增加四倍或更多的受试者数量以及出现无热或发热性上呼吸道疾病的受试者数量均无显著差异。在CP - 28,888 - 27组测试的15名志愿者中,有5名在鼻腔冲洗液中检测到干扰素,而安慰剂组15名志愿者中有2名检测到。