Douglas R G, Betts R F
Infect Immun. 1974 Mar;9(3):506-10. doi: 10.1128/iai.9.3.506-510.1974.
Nasal administration of an interferon inducer, CP-20,961 (N, N-dioctadecyl-N', N'-bis(2-hydroxyethyl)propanediamine), was evaluated in a double-blind, placebo-controlled study of experimental rhinovirus infection in 29 volunteers. Detectable nasal interferon developed in 10 of 15 subjects treated with CP-20,961, and 2 of 14 in the group receiving placebo (P < 0.006). Titers of CP-20,961-induced interferon ranged from 10 to 250 international units, concentrations similar to those observed in rhinovirus infections. Ten in the CP-20,961 group and eight in the placebo group became ill (P > 0.05). However, mean total sign scores were significantly diminished among CP-20,961-treated subjects as compared with placebo-treated subjects (P < 0.025). No significant effect was noted on quantitative virus shedding patterns or neutralizing antibody responses. These findings suggest that such concentrations of induced interferon do not protect against rhinovirus infection, and that factors other than interferon may be important in recovery from rhinovirus infection.
在一项针对29名志愿者的实验性鼻病毒感染的双盲、安慰剂对照研究中,评估了干扰素诱导剂CP - 20,961(N,N - 二十八烷基 - N',N' - 双(2 - 羟乙基)丙二胺)经鼻腔给药的效果。在接受CP - 20,961治疗的15名受试者中,有10人检测到鼻腔干扰素,而在接受安慰剂的14人组中有2人检测到(P < 0.006)。CP - 20,961诱导的干扰素滴度范围为10至250国际单位,其浓度与在鼻病毒感染中观察到的浓度相似。CP - 20,961组中有10人患病,安慰剂组中有8人患病(P > 0.05)。然而,与接受安慰剂治疗的受试者相比,接受CP - 20,961治疗的受试者的平均总体征评分显著降低(P < 0.025)。在定量病毒排出模式或中和抗体反应方面未观察到显著影响。这些发现表明,这种浓度的诱导干扰素不能预防鼻病毒感染,并且除干扰素外的其他因素可能在从鼻病毒感染中恢复方面很重要。