Lapierre Éliana, Monthony Adrian S, Torkamaneh Davoud
Département de phytologie, Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada.
Institut de Biologie Intégrative et des Systèmes (IBIS), Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada.
Genome. 2023 Aug 1;66(8):202-211. doi: 10.1139/gen-2023-0005. Epub 2023 May 10.
In the 18th century, Carolus Linnaeus created a formalized system of classification of living organisms based on their anatomic relationships, which we know as taxonomic nomenclature. Historically, the genus has been described three ways under this system: by C. Linnaeus in 1753, by J.B. Lamarck in 1785, and by D.E. Janischewsky in 1924, with these taxonomic classifications having been derived from physical, morphological, chemical, and geographical data. Today, this confusing taxonomy has led to an ongoing debate about whether the genus consists of a single species or multiple distinct species or subspecies. Recently, genome sequencing and bioinformatics have provided greater resolution of taxonomic assignments at the species level. As a result, some previously discussed classification frameworks have been brought into question. The aim of this review is to provide a historical context for the confusion surrounding the taxonomy of the genus and highlight recent research on genomics-based taxonomical approaches to clarify the question of taxonomy. We suggest that the latest evidence shifts away from the previous multiple species framework and points towards the genus consisting of a highly diverse monotypic species.
18世纪,卡罗勒斯·林奈基于生物之间的解剖学关系创建了一个生物分类的形式化系统,即我们所知的分类命名法。从历史上看,在这个系统下,该属有三种描述方式:1753年由林奈描述,1785年由J.B.拉马克描述,1924年由D.E.亚尼谢夫斯基描述,这些分类学分类源自物理、形态、化学和地理数据。如今,这种令人困惑的分类法引发了一场关于该属是由单一物种还是多个不同物种或亚种组成的持续争论。最近,基因组测序和生物信息学在物种水平上提供了更高分辨率的分类归属。因此,一些之前讨论过的分类框架受到了质疑。这篇综述的目的是为围绕该属分类法的混乱提供历史背景,并强调基于基因组学的分类学方法的最新研究,以阐明该属的分类问题。我们认为,最新证据不再支持先前的多个物种框架,而是表明该属由一个高度多样化的单型物种组成。