Department of Interventional Therapy, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, No.10 Tieyi Road, Yangfangdian Street, Haidian District, Beijing, 100038, China.
Department of Interventional Therapy, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100005, China.
BMC Gastroenterol. 2023 May 10;23(1):144. doi: 10.1186/s12876-023-02792-6.
The hemodynamics of patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension are complex and variable. We aimed to investigate differences in venous pressures determined by innovative angiography and conventional angiography using balloon occlusion of the hepatic veins in patients with alcoholic cirrhosis and portal hypertension.
A total of 134 patients with alcoholic cirrhosis who fulfilled the inclusion criteria from June 2017 to June 2020 were included. During transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt, conventional and innovative angiography were performed, and venous pressures were measured. A paired t-test and Pearson's correlation coefficient were used for analysis.
Conventional and innovative hepatic angiography detected lateral branches of the hepatic vein in 26 (19.4%) and 65 (48.5%) cases, respectively (P < 0.001). Innovative angiography detected a total of 65 patients with lateral shunts, of whom 37 (56.9%) had initial shunts. The average wedged hepatic venous pressure and portal venous pressure of the initial lateral branches were 21.27 ± 6.66 and 35.84 ± 7.86 mmHg, respectively, with correlation and determination coefficients of 0.342 (P < 0.05) and 0.117, respectively. The mean hepatic venous pressure gradient and portal pressure gradient were 9.59 ± 7.64 and 26.86 ± 6.78 mmHg, respectively, with correlation and determination coefficients of 0.292 (P = 0.079) and 0.085, respectively.
Innovative angiography reveals collateral branches of the hepatic veins more effectively than conventional angiography. Hepatic vein collateral branches are the primary factors leading to underestimation of wedged hepatic venous pressures and hepatic venous pressure gradients, with the initial hepatic vein collateral branches resulting in the most severe underestimations.
肝硬化和门静脉高压患者的血液动力学复杂且多变。本研究旨在探讨使用经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPS)时球囊阻断肝静脉的创新血管造影与传统血管造影评估酒精性肝硬化门静脉高压患者静脉压力的差异。
纳入 2017 年 6 月至 2020 年 6 月符合纳入标准的 134 例酒精性肝硬化患者。在 TIPS 过程中进行传统血管造影和创新血管造影,并测量静脉压力。采用配对 t 检验和 Pearson 相关系数进行分析。
传统血管造影和创新血管造影分别显示肝静脉侧支 26(19.4%)和 65(48.5%)例(P<0.001)。创新血管造影共发现 65 例患者存在侧支分流,其中 37 例(56.9%)为初始分流。初始侧支的平均肝静脉楔压和门静脉压分别为 21.27±6.66mmHg 和 35.84±7.86mmHg,相关性和决定系数分别为 0.342(P<0.05)和 0.117。肝静脉压力梯度和门静脉压力梯度分别为 9.59±7.64mmHg 和 26.86±6.78mmHg,相关性和决定系数分别为 0.292(P=0.079)和 0.085。
创新血管造影比传统血管造影更有效地显示肝静脉侧支。肝静脉侧支是导致肝静脉楔压和肝静脉压力梯度低估的主要因素,初始肝静脉侧支导致的低估最为严重。