• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2018 年美国成年人残疾的县级地理差异。

County-Level Geographic Disparities in Disabilities Among US Adults, 2018.

机构信息

Division of Population Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.

Division of Population Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 4770 Buford Hwy NE, MS S107-6, Atlanta, GA 30341 (

出版信息

Prev Chronic Dis. 2023 May 11;20:E37. doi: 10.5888/pcd20.230004.

DOI:10.5888/pcd20.230004
PMID:37167553
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10199691/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Local data are increasingly needed for public health practice. County-level data on disabilities can be a valuable complement to existing estimates of disabilities. The objective of this study was to describe the county-level prevalence of disabilities among US adults and identify geographic clusters of counties with a higher or lower prevalence of disabilities.

METHODS

We applied a multilevel logistic regression and poststratification approach to geocoded 2018 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System data, Census 2018 county-level population estimates, and American Community Survey 2014-2018 poverty estimates to generate county-level estimates for 6 functional disabilities and any disability type. We used cluster-outlier spatial statistical methods to identify clustered counties.

RESULTS

Among 3,142 counties, median estimated prevalence was 29.5% for any disability and differed by type: hearing (8.0%), vision (4.9%), cognition (11.5%), mobility (14.9%), self-care (3.7%), and independent living (7.2%). The spatial autocorrelation statistic, Moran's I, was 0.70 for any disability and 0.60 or greater for all 6 types of disability, indicating that disabilities were highly clustered at the county level. We observed similar spatial cluster patterns in all disability types except hearing disability.

CONCLUSION

The results suggest substantial differences in disability prevalence across US counties. These data, heretofore unavailable from a health survey, may help with planning programs at the county level to improve the quality of life for people with disabilities.

摘要

简介

公共卫生实践越来越需要当地数据。县级残疾数据可以是现有残疾估计数的宝贵补充。本研究的目的是描述美国成年人的县级残疾流行率,并确定残疾流行率较高或较低的县的地理聚类。

方法

我们应用多水平逻辑回归和后分层方法对地理编码的 2018 年行为风险因素监测系统数据、2018 年人口普查县级人口估计数以及 2014-2018 年美国社区调查贫困估计数进行了分析,以生成 6 种功能残疾和任何残疾类型的县级估计数。我们使用聚类异常空间统计方法来识别聚类县。

结果

在 3142 个县中,任何残疾的中位数估计患病率为 29.5%,且因类型而异:听力(8.0%)、视力(4.9%)、认知(11.5%)、行动能力(14.9%)、自我护理(3.7%)和独立生活(7.2%)。空间自相关统计量 Moran's I 为任何残疾的 0.70,为所有 6 种残疾类型的 0.60 或更高,表明残疾在县级高度聚类。除听力残疾外,我们在所有残疾类型中都观察到了类似的空间聚类模式。

结论

结果表明,美国各县的残疾流行率存在显著差异。这些数据来自健康调查,迄今为止尚不可用,可能有助于规划县级方案,以提高残疾人士的生活质量。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bc1/10199691/f5fc3f9cb905/PCD-20-E37s03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bc1/10199691/871247f42c31/PCD-20-E37s01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bc1/10199691/6ac28f040df4/PCD-20-E37s02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bc1/10199691/f5fc3f9cb905/PCD-20-E37s03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bc1/10199691/871247f42c31/PCD-20-E37s01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bc1/10199691/6ac28f040df4/PCD-20-E37s02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bc1/10199691/f5fc3f9cb905/PCD-20-E37s03.jpg

相似文献

1
County-Level Geographic Disparities in Disabilities Among US Adults, 2018.2018 年美国成年人残疾的县级地理差异。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2023 May 11;20:E37. doi: 10.5888/pcd20.230004.
2
Prevalence of Disability and Disability Types by Urban-Rural County Classification-U.S., 2016.按城乡县分类的残疾患病率和残疾类型-美国,2016 年。
Am J Prev Med. 2019 Dec;57(6):749-756. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2019.07.022.
3
Multilevel regression and poststratification for small-area estimation of population health outcomes: a case study of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease prevalence using the behavioral risk factor surveillance system.多水平回归和后分层法在小区域人群健康结果估计中的应用:以行为风险因素监测系统为例评估慢性阻塞性肺疾病的流行率。
Am J Epidemiol. 2014 Apr 15;179(8):1025-33. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwu018. Epub 2014 Mar 4.
4
Use of Small-Area Estimates to Describe County-Level Geographic Variation in Prevalence of Extreme Obesity Among US Adults.使用小区域估计描述美国成年人极端肥胖患病率的县一级地理差异。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 May 1;3(5):e204289. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.4289.
5
Spatial distributions in disaster risk vulnerability for people with disabilities in the U.S.美国残疾人灾害风险脆弱性的空间分布
Int J Disaster Risk Reduct. 2023 Mar;87:103571. doi: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.103571. Epub 2023 Feb 3.
6
Estimates of prevalence, demographic characteristics and social factors among people with disabilities in the USA: a cross-survey comparison.美国残疾人的患病率、人口特征及社会因素估计:一项跨调查比较
BMJ Open. 2018 Feb 14;8(2):e017828. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017828.
7
Self-reported short sleep duration among US adults by disability status and functional disability type: Results from the 2016 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System.美国成年人按残疾状况和功能障碍类型报告的短睡眠时间:2016 年行为风险因素监测系统的结果。
Disabil Health J. 2020 Jul;13(3):100887. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2020.100887. Epub 2020 Jan 23.
8
Prevalence of Disabilities and Health Care Access by Disability Status and Type Among Adults - United States, 2016.残疾状况和类型对美国成年人残疾和医疗保健获取的影响:2016 年。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2018 Aug 17;67(32):882-887. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6732a3.
9
Prevalence of disability among adults with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System 2016-2017.慢性阻塞性肺疾病成人残疾患病率,行为风险因素监测系统 2016-2017 年。
PLoS One. 2020 Feb 27;15(2):e0229404. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229404. eCollection 2020.
10
Calculating census tract-based life expectancy in New York state: a generalizable approach.计算纽约州基于普查区的预期寿命:一种可推广的方法。
Popul Health Metr. 2018 Jan 26;16(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s12963-018-0159-3.

本文引用的文献

1
PLACES: Local Data for Better Health.地点:本地数据,助力健康。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2022 Jun 16;19:E31. doi: 10.5888/pcd19.210459.
2
State-Level Health Care Expenditures Associated With Disability.与残疾相关的州级医疗保健支出。
Public Health Rep. 2021 Jul-Aug;136(4):441-450. doi: 10.1177/0033354920979807. Epub 2021 Mar 5.
3
Tobacco Product Use Among Adults - United States, 2019.成年人烟草制品使用情况 - 美国,2019 年。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020 Nov 20;69(46):1736-1742. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6946a4.
4
Prevalence of Disability and Disability Types by Urban-Rural County Classification-U.S., 2016.按城乡县分类的残疾患病率和残疾类型-美国,2016 年。
Am J Prev Med. 2019 Dec;57(6):749-756. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2019.07.022.
5
Using 3 Health Surveys to Compare Multilevel Models for Small Area Estimation for Chronic Diseases and Health Behaviors.利用三项健康调查比较用于慢性病和健康行为小区域估计的多层次模型。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2018 Nov 1;15:E133. doi: 10.5888/pcd15.180313.
6
Prevalence of Disabilities and Health Care Access by Disability Status and Type Among Adults - United States, 2016.残疾状况和类型对美国成年人残疾和医疗保健获取的影响:2016 年。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2018 Aug 17;67(32):882-887. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6732a3.
7
Hearing Disability Prevalence and Risk Factors in Two Recent National Surveys.两则近期全国性调查中的听力残疾患病率及危险因素。
Am J Prev Med. 2018 Sep;55(3):326-335. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2018.03.022. Epub 2018 Jul 19.
8
Comparison of Methods for Estimating Prevalence of Chronic Diseases and Health Behaviors for Small Geographic Areas: Boston Validation Study, 2013.小地理区域慢性疾病和健康行为发生率的估计方法比较:2013 年波士顿验证研究。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2017 Oct 19;14:E99. doi: 10.5888/pcd14.170281.
9
Validation of multilevel regression and poststratification methodology for small area estimation of health indicators from the behavioral risk factor surveillance system.行为危险因素监测系统中小区域健康指标估计的多水平回归和事后分层方法的验证
Am J Epidemiol. 2015 Jul 15;182(2):127-37. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwv002. Epub 2015 May 7.
10
2013 NCHS Urban-Rural Classification Scheme for Counties.2013年国家卫生统计中心县域城乡分类方案
Vital Health Stat 2. 2014 Apr(166):1-73.