• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

COVID-19 检测方案指导隔离时间:成本效益分析。

COVID-19 testing protocols to guide duration of isolation: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

机构信息

Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California San Francisco, 490 Illinois St, Box 0936, 95158, San Francisco, CA, USA.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2023 May 11;23(1):864. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15762-0.

DOI:10.1186/s12889-023-15762-0
PMID:37170225
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10173903/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Omicron variant of SARS-CoV-2 led to a steep rise in transmissions, and emerging variants continue to influence case rates across the US. As public tolerance for isolation abated, CDC guidance on duration of at-home isolation of COVID-19 cases was shortened to five days if no symptoms, with no laboratory test requirement, despite more cautious approaches advocated by other federal experts.

METHODS

We conducted a decision tree analysis of alternative protocols for ending COVID-19 isolation, estimating net costs (direct and productivity), secondary infections, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios. Sensitivity analyses assessed the impact of input uncertainty.

RESULTS

Per 100 individuals, five-day isolation had 23 predicted secondary infections and a net cost of $33,000. Symptom check on day five (CDC guidance) yielded a 23% decrease in secondary infections (to 17.8), with a net cost of $45,000. Antigen testing on day six yielded 2.9 secondary infections and $63,000 in net costs. This protocol, compared to the next best protocol of antigen testing on day five of a maximum eight-day isolation, cost an additional $1,300 per secondary infection averted. Antigen or polymerase chain reaction testing on day five were dominated (more expensive and less effective) versus antigen testing on day six. Results were qualitatively robust to uncertainty in key inputs.

CONCLUSIONS

A six-day isolation with antigen testing to confirm the absence of contagious virus appears the most effective and cost-effective de-isolation protocol to shorten at-home isolation of individuals with COVID-19.

摘要

背景

SARS-CoV-2 的奥密克戎变体导致传播急剧上升,新出现的变体继续影响美国各地的病例率。随着公众对隔离的容忍度降低,CDC 将 COVID-19 病例在家隔离的持续时间从如果没有症状则缩短至五天的指导缩短,无需进行实验室检测,尽管其他联邦专家提倡更为谨慎的方法。

方法

我们对结束 COVID-19 隔离的替代方案进行了决策树分析,估计了净成本(直接和生产力)、二次感染和增量成本效益比。敏感性分析评估了输入不确定性的影响。

结果

每 100 人中有 23 例预测的二次感染和 33,000 美元的净成本。在第五天进行症状检查(CDC 指南)可将二次感染减少 23%(降至 17.8),净成本为 45,000 美元。第六天进行抗原检测可导致 2.9 例二次感染和 63,000 美元的净成本。与下一个最佳方案(最长八天隔离期内第五天进行抗原检测)相比,该方案每避免一次二次感染的额外成本为 1,300 美元。第五天进行抗原或聚合酶链反应检测与第六天进行抗原检测相比,成本更高且效果更差。结果在关键输入存在不确定性的情况下具有定性稳健性。

结论

使用抗原检测确认无传染性病毒的六天隔离似乎是最有效和最具成本效益的解除隔离方案,可以缩短 COVID-19 患者的居家隔离时间。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2fdd/10176864/51d2ef851d36/12889_2023_15762_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2fdd/10176864/d7a1f6094adf/12889_2023_15762_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2fdd/10176864/51d2ef851d36/12889_2023_15762_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2fdd/10176864/d7a1f6094adf/12889_2023_15762_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2fdd/10176864/51d2ef851d36/12889_2023_15762_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
COVID-19 testing protocols to guide duration of isolation: a cost-effectiveness analysis.COVID-19 检测方案指导隔离时间:成本效益分析。
BMC Public Health. 2023 May 11;23(1):864. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15762-0.
2
Cost-effectiveness of antigen testing for ending COVID-19 isolation.抗原检测用于结束新冠病毒隔离的成本效益分析
medRxiv. 2022 Mar 21:2022.03.21.22272687. doi: 10.1101/2022.03.21.22272687.
3
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of four different strategies for SARS-CoV-2 surveillance in the general population (CoV-Surv Study): a structured summary of a study protocol for a cluster-randomised, two-factorial controlled trial.在普通人群中进行 SARS-CoV-2 监测的四种不同策略的有效性和成本效益(CoV-Surv 研究):一项关于集群随机、双因素对照试验的研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2021 Jan 8;22(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04982-z.
4
Modelling of hypothetical SARS-CoV-2 point-of-care tests on admission to hospital from A&E: rapid cost-effectiveness analysis.急诊科入院时假设的 SARS-CoV-2 即时检测模型:快速成本效益分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2021 Mar;25(21):1-68. doi: 10.3310/hta25210.
5
Cost-effectiveness of severe acute respiratory coronavirus virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) testing and isolation strategies in nursing homes.养老院内严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2(SARS-CoV-2)检测和隔离策略的成本效益。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2024 Jun;45(6):754-761. doi: 10.1017/ice.2024.9. Epub 2024 Feb 15.
6
Comparative cost-effectiveness of SARS-CoV-2 testing strategies in the USA: a modelling study.美国 SARS-CoV-2 检测策略的比较成本效益:建模研究。
Lancet Public Health. 2021 Mar;6(3):e184-e191. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(21)00002-5. Epub 2021 Feb 5.
7
Clinical and Economic Effects of Widespread Rapid Testing to Decrease SARS-CoV-2 Transmission.广泛快速检测以降低 SARS-CoV-2 传播的临床和经济影响。
Ann Intern Med. 2021 Jun;174(6):803-810. doi: 10.7326/M21-0510. Epub 2021 Mar 9.
8
COVID-19 Testing Strategies for K-12 Schools in California: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.加利福尼亚州 K-12 学校的 COVID-19 检测策略:成本效益分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 30;19(15):9371. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19159371.
9
Assessment of SARS-CoV-2 Screening Strategies to Permit the Safe Reopening of College Campuses in the United States.评估 SARS-CoV-2 筛查策略,以允许美国大学校园安全重新开放。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jul 1;3(7):e2016818. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.16818.
10
Universal screening for SARS-CoV-2 infection: a rapid review.SARS-CoV-2 感染的普遍筛查:快速综述。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Sep 15;9(9):CD013718. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013718.

引用本文的文献

1
Cost-benefit analysis of the quarantine policy during the outbreak of the Covid-19 virus in Iran.伊朗新冠病毒疫情期间隔离政策的成本效益分析
Health Econ Rev. 2025 Aug 4;15(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s13561-025-00626-7.
2
A framework for counterfactual analysis, strategy evaluation, and control of epidemics using reproduction number estimates.一种使用繁殖数估计进行反事实分析、策略评估和疫情控制的框架。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2024 Nov 20;20(11):e1012569. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012569. eCollection 2024 Nov.
3
Performance of rapid antigen tests to detect SARS-CoV-2 variant diversity and correlation with viral culture positivity: implication for diagnostic development and future public health strategies.

本文引用的文献

1
Indirect COVID-19 health effects and potential mitigating interventions: Cost-effectiveness framework.间接 COVID-19 健康影响及其潜在缓解干预措施:成本效益框架。
PLoS One. 2022 Jul 18;17(7):e0271523. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271523. eCollection 2022.
2
Antigen Test Positivity After COVID-19 Isolation - Yukon-Kuskokwim Delta Region, Alaska, January-February 2022.2022 年 1 月至 2 月,阿拉斯加育空-科尤库克三角洲地区 COVID-19 隔离后抗原检测阳性。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2022 Feb 25;71(8):293-298. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7108a3.
3
Optimal strategies to screen health care workers for COVID-19 in the US: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
快速抗原检测用于检测SARS-CoV-2变异多样性及其与病毒培养阳性的相关性:对诊断发展和未来公共卫生策略的启示
mBio. 2024 Dec 11;15(12):e0273724. doi: 10.1128/mbio.02737-24. Epub 2024 Oct 31.
4
Modelling the effectiveness of an isolation strategy for managing mpox outbreaks with variable infectiousness profiles.建模具有可变传染性特征的隔离策略在管理猴痘疫情中的效果。
Nat Commun. 2024 Aug 26;15(1):7112. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-51143-w.
5
Deisolation in the Healthcare Setting Following Recent COVID-19 Infection.近期感染 COVID-19 后的医疗环境去隔离化。
Viruses. 2024 Jul 15;16(7):1131. doi: 10.3390/v16071131.
6
Economic Evaluation of COVID-19 Screening Tests and Surveillance Strategies in Low-Income, Middle-Income, and High-Income Countries: A Systematic Review.经济评估 COVID-19 筛查试验和监测策略在低收入、中等收入和高收入国家:系统评价。
Med Sci Monit. 2024 Apr 21;30:e943863. doi: 10.12659/MSM.943863.
7
How are countries responding differently to COVID-19: a systematic review of guidelines on isolation measures.各国对 COVID-19 的反应有何不同:隔离措施指南的系统评价。
Front Public Health. 2023 Aug 30;11:1190519. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1190519. eCollection 2023.
美国医护人员新冠病毒病筛查的优化策略:一项成本效益分析
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2022 Jan 15;20(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s12962-021-00336-x.
4
Risk Factors for Severe COVID-19 Outcomes Among Persons Aged ≥18 Years Who Completed a Primary COVID-19 Vaccination Series - 465 Health Care Facilities, United States, December 2020-October 2021.≥18 岁完成初级 COVID-19 疫苗接种系列的人群中严重 COVID-19 结局的危险因素-465 家医疗保健机构,美国,2020 年 12 月-2021 年 10 月。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2022 Jan 7;71(1):19-25. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7101a4.
5
Global Percentage of Asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 Infections Among the Tested Population and Individuals With Confirmed COVID-19 Diagnosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.全球检测人群和确诊 COVID-19 人群中无症状 SARS-CoV-2 感染比例的系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Dec 1;4(12):e2137257. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.37257.
6
Omicron SARS-CoV-2 variant: a new chapter in the COVID-19 pandemic.奥密克戎新冠病毒变体:新冠疫情的新篇章。
Lancet. 2021 Dec 11;398(10317):2126-2128. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02758-6. Epub 2021 Dec 3.
7
Time to resolution of respiratory and systemic coronavirus disease 2019 symptoms in community setting.社区环境中呼吸道和全身 2019 冠状病毒病症状的缓解时间。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2021 Dec;27(12):1862.e1-1862.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2021.08.021. Epub 2021 Sep 3.
8
Mask adherence and rate of COVID-19 across the United States.美国各地的口罩佩戴率和 COVID-19 感染率。
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 14;16(4):e0249891. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249891. eCollection 2021.
9
Quantifying population contact patterns in the United States during the COVID-19 pandemic.量化新冠疫情期间美国的人口接触模式。
Nat Commun. 2021 Feb 9;12(1):893. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-20990-2.
10
Antigen-Based Testing but Not Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction Correlates With Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Viral Culture.抗原检测与实时聚合酶链反应相关,但与严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2 病毒培养不相关。
Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Nov 2;73(9):e2861-e2866. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa1706.