• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

量化新冠疫情期间美国的人口接触模式。

Quantifying population contact patterns in the United States during the COVID-19 pandemic.

作者信息

Feehan Dennis M, Mahmud Ayesha S

机构信息

Department of Demography, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA.

出版信息

Nat Commun. 2021 Feb 9;12(1):893. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-20990-2.

DOI:10.1038/s41467-021-20990-2
PMID:33563992
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7873309/
Abstract

SARS-CoV-2 is transmitted primarily through close, person-to-person interactions. Physical distancing policies can control the spread of SARS-CoV-2 by reducing the amount of these interactions in a population. Here, we report results from four waves of contact surveys designed to quantify the impact of these policies during the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States. We surveyed 9,743 respondents between March 22 and September 26, 2020. We find that interpersonal contact has been dramatically reduced in the US, with an 82% (95%CI: 80%-83%) reduction in the average number of daily contacts observed during the first wave compared to pre-pandemic levels. However, we find increases in contact rates over the subsequent waves. We also find that certain demographic groups, including people under 45 and males, have significantly higher contact rates than the rest of the population. Tracking these changes can provide rapid assessments of the impact of physical distancing policies and help to identify at-risk populations.

摘要

严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)主要通过密切的人际接触传播。物理距离政策可以通过减少人群中此类接触的数量来控制SARS-CoV-2的传播。在此,我们报告了四轮接触调查的结果,这些调查旨在量化在美国2019冠状病毒病大流行期间这些政策的影响。我们在2020年3月22日至9月26日期间对9743名受访者进行了调查。我们发现,美国的人际接触已大幅减少,与大流行前水平相比,在第一波调查期间观察到的日均接触次数减少了82%(95%置信区间:80%-83%)。然而,我们发现在随后的几轮调查中接触率有所上升。我们还发现,某些人口群体,包括45岁以下的人和男性,其接触率明显高于其他人群。追踪这些变化可以快速评估物理距离政策的影响,并有助于识别高危人群。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/51c5/7873309/8d62ebb92a3b/41467_2021_20990_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/51c5/7873309/89f696d0305a/41467_2021_20990_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/51c5/7873309/364296ed3820/41467_2021_20990_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/51c5/7873309/8f4bf62ed819/41467_2021_20990_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/51c5/7873309/9e56cdef6ca3/41467_2021_20990_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/51c5/7873309/8d62ebb92a3b/41467_2021_20990_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/51c5/7873309/89f696d0305a/41467_2021_20990_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/51c5/7873309/364296ed3820/41467_2021_20990_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/51c5/7873309/8f4bf62ed819/41467_2021_20990_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/51c5/7873309/9e56cdef6ca3/41467_2021_20990_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/51c5/7873309/8d62ebb92a3b/41467_2021_20990_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Quantifying population contact patterns in the United States during the COVID-19 pandemic.量化新冠疫情期间美国的人口接触模式。
Nat Commun. 2021 Feb 9;12(1):893. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-20990-2.
2
Social contact patterns during the early COVID-19 pandemic in Norway: insights from a panel study, April to September 2020.2020 年 4 月至 9 月挪威 COVID-19 大流行早期的社会接触模式:一项面板研究的见解。
BMC Public Health. 2024 May 29;24(1):1438. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18853-8.
3
Social contact patterns following the COVID-19 pandemic: a snapshot of post-pandemic behaviour from the CoMix study.新冠肺炎疫情后的社会接触模式:CoMix 研究对疫情后行为的快照分析。
Epidemics. 2024 Sep;48:100778. doi: 10.1016/j.epidem.2024.100778. Epub 2024 Jun 29.
4
Social contacts in Switzerland during the COVID-19 pandemic: Insights from the CoMix study.瑞士在 COVID-19 大流行期间的社会接触情况:来自 CoMix 研究的洞察。
Epidemics. 2024 Jun;47:100771. doi: 10.1016/j.epidem.2024.100771. Epub 2024 May 10.
5
Mapping social distancing measures to the reproduction number for COVID-19.将社交隔离措施映射到 COVID-19 的繁殖数。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2021 Jul 19;376(1829):20200276. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0276. Epub 2021 May 31.
6
Investigating the relationship between interventions, contact patterns, and SARS-CoV-2 transmissibility.研究干预措施、接触模式与 SARS-CoV-2 传染性之间的关系。
Epidemics. 2022 Sep;40:100601. doi: 10.1016/j.epidem.2022.100601. Epub 2022 Jun 17.
7
Longitudinal social contacts among school-aged children during the COVID-19 pandemic: the Bay Area Contacts among Kids (BACK) study.新冠疫情期间学龄儿童的纵向社会接触:湾区儿童接触研究(BACK 研究)。
BMC Infect Dis. 2022 Mar 10;22(1):242. doi: 10.1186/s12879-022-07218-4.
8
Using a household-structured branching process to analyse contact tracing in the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.利用家庭结构分支过程分析 SARS-CoV-2 大流行中的接触者追踪。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2021 Jul 19;376(1829):20200267. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0267. Epub 2021 May 31.
9
Quantifying social contact patterns in Minnesota during stay-at-home social distancing order.量化明尼苏达州在居家隔离令期间的社交接触模式。
BMC Infect Dis. 2023 May 15;23(1):324. doi: 10.1186/s12879-022-07968-1.
10
Social contacts patterns relevant to the transmission of infectious diseases in Suzhou, China following the COVID-19 epidemic.新冠肺炎疫情后中国苏州传染病传播相关的社会接触模式。
J Health Popul Nutr. 2024 May 9;43(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s41043-024-00555-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of imported COVID-19 cases on South Korea's response: variant transitions and regional patterns (2020-2023).输入性新冠病例对韩国应对措施的影响:变异株演变与区域模式(2020 - 2023年)
BMC Infect Dis. 2025 Jul 1;25(1):820. doi: 10.1186/s12879-025-11260-3.
2
Epidemic modeling for the resurgence of COVID-19 in Chinese local communities.中国局部地区新冠疫情复发的流行学建模
J Saf Sci Resil. 2022 Sep;3(3):229-234. doi: 10.1016/j.jnlssr.2022.03.005. Epub 2022 May 10.
3
The effect of COVID-19 vaccination on change in contact and implications for transmission.

本文引用的文献

1
Analyzing the demographic, spatial, and temporal factors influencing social contact patterns in U.S. and implications for infectious disease spread.分析影响美国社会接触模式的人口、空间和时间因素及其对传染病传播的影响。
BMC Infect Dis. 2021 Sep 27;21(1):1009. doi: 10.1186/s12879-021-06610-w.
2
Evolving social contact patterns during the COVID-19 crisis in Luxembourg.卢森堡 COVID-19 危机期间社会接触模式的演变。
PLoS One. 2020 Aug 6;15(8):e0237128. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237128. eCollection 2020.
3
Age-dependent effects in the transmission and control of COVID-19 epidemics.
2019冠状病毒病疫苗接种对接触变化及传播影响
Epidemics. 2025 Jun;51:100827. doi: 10.1016/j.epidem.2025.100827. Epub 2025 Apr 9.
4
How immunity shapes the long-term dynamics of influenza H3N2.免疫力如何塑造甲型H3N2流感病毒的长期动态变化。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2025 Mar 20;21(3):e1012893. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012893. eCollection 2025 Mar.
5
Effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on TB outcomes in the United States: a Bayesian analysis.2019年冠状病毒病疫情对美国结核病结局的影响:一项贝叶斯分析
Clin Infect Dis. 2025 Feb 27. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaf092.
6
A modeling study to define guidelines for antigen screening in schools and workplaces to mitigate COVID-19 outbreaks.一项建模研究,旨在确定学校和工作场所抗原筛查的指导方针,以减轻新冠疫情的爆发。
Commun Med (Lond). 2025 Jan 3;5(1):2. doi: 10.1038/s43856-024-00716-3.
7
Change in mental health service utilization from pre- to post-COVID-19 period in the United States.美国新冠肺炎疫情前后心理健康服务利用情况的变化。
Heliyon. 2024 Nov 15;10(22):e40454. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e40454. eCollection 2024 Nov 30.
8
Novel sampling strategy for regular nucleic acid testing in low risk areas during epidemics.疫情期间低风险地区定期核酸检测的新型采样策略。
Sci Rep. 2024 Nov 15;14(1):28241. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-79990-z.
9
Effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on TB outcomes in the United States: a Bayesian analysis.2019年冠状病毒病大流行对美国结核病结局的影响:一项贝叶斯分析。
medRxiv. 2024 Oct 18:2024.10.17.24315683. doi: 10.1101/2024.10.17.24315683.
10
Racial disparities in Phase 1 COVID-19 vaccine shipments to Neighborhood sites in Pennsylvania by the Federal Retail Pharmacy Program.宾夕法尼亚州邻里站点的联邦零售药房计划的第一阶段 COVID-19 疫苗配送中的种族差异。
Sci Rep. 2024 Oct 10;14(1):23591. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-73116-1.
年龄相关因素对 COVID-19 疫情传播和防控的影响。
Nat Med. 2020 Aug;26(8):1205-1211. doi: 10.1038/s41591-020-0962-9. Epub 2020 Jun 16.
4
Quantifying the impact of physical distance measures on the transmission of COVID-19 in the UK.量化身体距离措施对英国 COVID-19 传播的影响。
BMC Med. 2020 May 7;18(1):124. doi: 10.1186/s12916-020-01597-8.
5
Changes in contact patterns shape the dynamics of the COVID-19 outbreak in China.接触模式的改变塑造了中国 COVID-19 疫情的动态。
Science. 2020 Jun 26;368(6498):1481-1486. doi: 10.1126/science.abb8001. Epub 2020 Apr 29.
6
How will country-based mitigation measures influence the course of the COVID-19 epidemic?基于国家的缓解措施将如何影响新冠疫情的发展进程?
Lancet. 2020 Mar 21;395(10228):931-934. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30567-5. Epub 2020 Mar 9.
7
Using an Online Sample to Estimate the Size of an Offline Population.使用在线样本估计离线总体规模。
Demography. 2019 Dec;56(6):2377-2392. doi: 10.1007/s13524-019-00840-z.
8
Projecting social contact matrices to different demographic structures.预测不同人口结构的社会接触矩阵。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2018 Dec 7;14(12):e1006638. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006638. eCollection 2018 Dec.
9
Contagion! The BBC Four Pandemic - The model behind the documentary.传染病!BBC 四台制作的关于大流行病的纪录片——纪录片背后的模型。
Epidemics. 2018 Sep;24:49-59. doi: 10.1016/j.epidem.2018.03.003. Epub 2018 Mar 22.
10
Projecting social contact matrices in 152 countries using contact surveys and demographic data.利用接触调查和人口数据预测152个国家的社会接触矩阵。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2017 Sep 12;13(9):e1005697. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005697. eCollection 2017 Sep.