Johansson Therese, Tishelman Carol, Eriksson Lars E, Cohen Joachim, Goliath Ida
Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden.
Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy & Rehabilitation, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery & Palliative Care, King's College London, London, UK.
Palliat Support Care. 2023 May 12:1-11. doi: 10.1017/S1478951523000548.
Death literacy is a recent conceptualization representing both individual and community competence, for example, a set of knowledge and skills for engaging in end-of-life-related situations. Little is yet known about which factors are associated with death literacy. A cross-sectional survey using the Swedish version of the Death Literacy Index, the DLI-S, was therefore conducted to explore associations between death literacy and sociodemographic, health, and experience variables.
A quota sample of 503 adults (mean age 49.95 ± 17.92), recruited from an online Swedish survey panel, completed a survey comprising the DLI-S and background questions.
A hierarchical regression model with 3 blocks explained 40.5% of the variance in death literacy, (22, 477) = 14.75. The sociodemographic factors age, gender, education, widowhood, and religious/spiritual belief accounted for 13.7% of the variance. Adding professional care factors contributed to an additional 15.8% of variance, with working in health care being significantly associated with death literacy. Including experiential factors explained another 11.0% of the variance, of which experiences of caring for and supporting dying and grieving people, both in a work, volunteer, or personal context, were positively associated with death literacy.
This study contributes a tentative explanatory model of the influence of different factors on death literacy, outlining both direct and indirect associations. Our findings also support the hypothesized experiential basis for death literacy development in the Swedish context. The moderate degree of overall variance explained suggests there may be additional factors to consider to better understand the death literacy construct and how its development may be supported.
死亡素养是一个最近提出的概念,代表个人和社区能力,例如,一套用于应对临终相关情况的知识和技能。关于哪些因素与死亡素养相关,目前所知甚少。因此,我们进行了一项横断面调查,使用瑞典版的死亡素养指数(DLI-S)来探索死亡素养与社会人口统计学、健康和经验变量之间的关联。
从瑞典在线调查小组招募了503名成年人(平均年龄49.95±17.92)作为配额样本,他们完成了一项包括DLI-S和背景问题的调查。
一个包含3个模块的分层回归模型解释了死亡素养方差的40.5%,F(22, 477) = 14.75。社会人口统计学因素年龄、性别、教育程度、丧偶情况和宗教/精神信仰占方差的13.7%。加入专业护理因素又增加了15.8%的方差,其中从事医疗保健工作与死亡素养显著相关。纳入经验因素又解释了11.0%的方差,其中在工作、志愿或个人背景下照顾和支持临终及悲伤者的经历与死亡素养呈正相关。
本研究提出了一个关于不同因素对死亡素养影响的初步解释模型,概述了直接和间接关联。我们的研究结果还支持了瑞典背景下死亡素养发展的假设经验基础。总体方差解释的适度程度表明,可能还有其他因素需要考虑,以更好地理解死亡素养的构成及其发展如何得到支持。