Vice-Chair of Quality and Innovation in the Department of Family and Community Medicine (DFCM) at the University of Toronto (U of T) in Ontario; Associate Professor in the Faculty of Medicine and the Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation at U of T; Scientist in the MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions at St Michael's Hospital in Toronto; and a staff physician in the DFCM at St Michael's Hospital.
Senior Qualitative Researcher with Health Experiences Research Canada in Montréal, Que.
Can Fam Physician. 2023 May;69(5):e113-e119. doi: 10.46747/cfp.6905e113.
To explore the experiences of family physicians leading quality improvement (QI) efforts and to better understand facilitators and barriers related to advancing QI in family practice.
Qualitative descriptive study.
The Department of Family and Community Medicine at the University of Toronto in Ontario. The department launched a quality and innovation program in 2011 with the dual goals of teaching QI skills to learners and supporting faculty in leading QI efforts in practice.
Family physician faculty who held QI leadership roles at any of the department's 14 teaching units between 2011 and 2018.
Fifteen semistructured telephone interviews were conducted over 3 months in 2018. Analysis was informed by a qualitative descriptive approach. Consistency of responses across the interviews was suggestive of thematic saturation.
Substantial variation was found in the level of engagement with QI in practice settings despite the common training, forms of support, and curriculum the department provided. Four factors influenced the uptake of QI. First, committed leadership across the organization was fundamental to developing an effective QI culture. Second, external drivers such as mandatory QI plans sometimes motivated engagement in QI but sometimes were barriers, particularly when internal priorities conflicted with external demands. Third, at many practices, QI was widely perceived as extra work rather than as a way to enable better patient care. Finally, physicians described lack of time and resources as a challenge, particularly in community practices, and advocated for practice facilitation as a mechanism to support QI efforts.
Advancing QI in primary care practice will require committed leaders, a clear understanding among physicians of the potential benefits of QI, alignment of external demands with internal drivers for improvement, and dedicated time for QI work along with support such as practice facilitation.
探索家庭医生在质量改进(QI)工作中的经验,更好地了解与推进家庭实践中 QI 相关的促进因素和障碍。
定性描述性研究。
安大略省多伦多大学家庭与社区医学系。该系于 2011 年启动了一项质量和创新计划,其双重目标是向学习者传授 QI 技能,并支持教师在实践中领导 QI 工作。
2011 年至 2018 年期间,在该系的 14 个教学单位中担任任何 QI 领导角色的家庭医生教师。
2018 年 3 个月期间进行了 15 次半结构化电话访谈。分析方法采用定性描述方法。访谈之间的回复一致性表明主题达到了饱和。
尽管该系提供了共同的培训、支持形式和课程,但在实践环境中对 QI 的参与程度存在很大差异。有四个因素影响了 QI 的采用。首先,组织内的承诺领导是发展有效的 QI 文化的基础。其次,外部驱动因素,如强制性的 QI 计划,有时会激发对 QI 的参与,但有时也会成为障碍,特别是当内部优先事项与外部需求发生冲突时。第三,在许多实践中,QI 被广泛视为额外的工作,而不是改善患者护理的一种方式。最后,医生们表示缺乏时间和资源是一个挑战,特别是在社区实践中,并主张通过实践促进来支持 QI 工作。
在初级保健实践中推进 QI 需要有承诺的领导者、医生对 QI 的潜在益处有清晰的认识、将外部需求与内部改进驱动因素保持一致、为 QI 工作分配专门的时间,并提供实践促进等支持。