• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全科医生参与:指导澳大利亚初级卫生网络参与活动的拟议模型。

GP Engagement: A Proposed Model to Guide Engagement Activities in Australian Primary Health Networks.

机构信息

Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

出版信息

J Prim Care Community Health. 2024 Jan-Dec;15:21501319241281579. doi: 10.1177/21501319241281579.

DOI:10.1177/21501319241281579
PMID:39465555
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11528753/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Engagement with general practice is a requirement of Australia's Primary Health Networks (PHNs). We propose a model for engagement that draws on principles of stakeholder and clinician engagement, tailored to meet the needs of PHNs and general practitioners (GPs).

METHODS

A comprehensive literature review was undertaken to identify components, challenges, and approaches to optimizing clinician engagement. Interviews with GPs (n = 18), other practice staff (n = 12), PHN staff, and other stakeholders (n = 15) across 3 PHN regions in Victoria, Australia, were used to identify perceived needs of GPs and opportunities for engagement with PHNs. Interview transcripts, notes, and contact summaries were collated and organized using QSR NVivo to support the process of coding and identification of common themes and perspectives. Information from the literature and interviews was synthesized to inform development of a model for GP engagement that could guide GP strategy and engagement activities undertaken by PHNs.

FINDINGS

PHNs engaged with GPs for accreditation, quality improvement, data sharing, continuing professional development, commissioning, and population health initiatives, among others. GPs were motivated to engage with PHNs, however, the roles of PHNs and benefits of engagement were not always clear. A model to support PHN engagement with general practice was developed comprising: (1) Organizational values for engagement; (2) Needs of GPs; (3) Areas of engagement; (4) Stages of engagement; (5) Communication planning; and (6) Monitoring and Evaluation.

CONCLUSION

The proposed model represents contemporary understanding in clinician engagement, drawing upon concepts from community and stakeholder engagement, and extending established models for engagement into the setting of general practice.

摘要

背景

参与全科医学是澳大利亚初级卫生网络(PHN)的要求。我们提出了一种参与模式,该模式借鉴了利益相关者和临床医生参与的原则,并针对 PHN 和全科医生(GP)的需求进行了调整。

方法

我们进行了全面的文献综述,以确定优化临床医生参与的组成部分、挑战和方法。在澳大利亚维多利亚州的 3 个 PHN 地区,对 18 名全科医生(GP)、12 名其他执业人员、PHN 工作人员和其他利益相关者进行了采访,以确定 GP 的需求和与 PHN 合作的机会。采访记录、笔记和联系摘要使用 QSR NVivo 进行整理和组织,以支持编码和确定共同主题和观点的过程。从文献和访谈中收集的信息被综合起来,为 GP 参与模型的制定提供信息,该模型可以为 GP 策略和 PHN 开展的参与活动提供指导。

结果

PHN 与 GP 合作进行认证、质量改进、数据共享、持续专业发展、委托和人口健康计划等活动。GP 有动力与 PHN 合作,但 PHN 的角色和合作的好处并不总是明确的。我们开发了一个支持 PHN 与全科医学合作的模型,包括:(1)参与的组织价值观;(2)GP 的需求;(3)合作领域;(4)合作阶段;(5)沟通计划;和(6)监测和评估。

结论

所提出的模型代表了对临床医生参与的当代理解,借鉴了社区和利益相关者参与的概念,并将已建立的参与模型扩展到全科医学领域。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61fb/11528753/cebe15719424/10.1177_21501319241281579-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61fb/11528753/cebe15719424/10.1177_21501319241281579-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61fb/11528753/cebe15719424/10.1177_21501319241281579-fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
GP Engagement: A Proposed Model to Guide Engagement Activities in Australian Primary Health Networks.全科医生参与:指导澳大利亚初级卫生网络参与活动的拟议模型。
J Prim Care Community Health. 2024 Jan-Dec;15:21501319241281579. doi: 10.1177/21501319241281579.
2
The educational effects of portfolios on undergraduate student learning: a Best Evidence Medical Education (BEME) systematic review. BEME Guide No. 11.档案袋对本科学生学习的教育效果:最佳证据医学教育(BEME)系统评价。BEME指南第11号。
Med Teach. 2009 Apr;31(4):282-98. doi: 10.1080/01421590902889897.
3
Stakeholders' perceptions and experiences of factors influencing the commissioning, delivery, and uptake of general health checks: a qualitative evidence synthesis.利益相关者对影响一般健康检查的委托、提供和接受因素的看法与体验:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Mar 20;3(3):CD014796. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014796.pub2.
4
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.
5
The use of Open Dialogue in Trauma Informed Care services for mental health consumers and their family networks: A scoping review.创伤知情护理服务中使用开放对话模式为心理健康消费者及其家庭网络提供服务:范围综述。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2024 Aug;31(4):681-698. doi: 10.1111/jpm.13023. Epub 2024 Jan 17.
6
How to Implement Digital Clinical Consultations in UK Maternity Care: the ARM@DA Realist Review.如何在英国产科护理中实施数字临床会诊:ARM@DA实证主义综述
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 May 21:1-77. doi: 10.3310/WQFV7425.
7
Experiences of gynecological cancer patients receiving care from specialist nurses: a qualitative systematic review.妇科癌症患者接受专科护士护理的体验:一项定性系统综述。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2017 Aug;15(8):2087-2112. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-003126.
8
Eliciting adverse effects data from participants in clinical trials.从临床试验参与者中获取不良反应数据。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 16;1(1):MR000039. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000039.pub2.
9
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.利用预后信息为乳腺癌患者选择辅助性全身治疗的成本效益
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340.
10
Clinical judgement by primary care physicians for the diagnosis of all-cause dementia or cognitive impairment in symptomatic people.初级保健医生对有症状人群进行全因痴呆或认知障碍诊断的临床判断。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jun 16;6(6):CD012558. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012558.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Factors influencing family physician engagement in practice-based quality improvement: Qualitative study.影响家庭医生参与以实践为基础的质量改进的因素:定性研究。
Can Fam Physician. 2023 May;69(5):e113-e119. doi: 10.46747/cfp.6905e113.
2
Using Normalisation Process Theory in general practice research.在全科医疗研究中运用规范化过程理论。
Aust J Gen Pract. 2023 Apr;52(4):243-245. doi: 10.31128/AJGP-10-22-6593.
3
State-of-the-art literature review methodology: A six-step approach for knowledge synthesis.**译文**:最先进的文献综述方法学:知识综合的六步方法。
Perspect Med Educ. 2022 Oct;11(5):281-288. doi: 10.1007/s40037-022-00725-9. Epub 2022 Sep 5.
4
Health care system factors influencing primary healthcare workers' engagement in national cancer screening programs: a qualitative study.影响基层医疗工作者参与国家癌症筛查项目的医疗系统因素:一项定性研究
Aust N Z J Public Health. 2022 Dec;46(6):858-864. doi: 10.1111/1753-6405.13272. Epub 2022 Jun 23.
5
Understanding and Optimizing Physician Engagement.理解并优化医生参与度。
J Am Coll Surg. 2022 Feb 1;234(2):227-237. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2021.09.013.
6
Transcription and Qualitative Methods: Implications for Third Sector Research.转录与定性方法:对第三部门研究的启示
Voluntas. 2023;34(1):140-153. doi: 10.1007/s11266-021-00400-3. Epub 2021 Sep 10.
7
How do general practices respond to a pandemic? Protocol for a prospective qualitative study of six Australian practices.全科医生如何应对大流行?六项澳大利亚实践的前瞻性定性研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 Sep 14;11(9):e046086. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046086.
8
A Review of 50-Years of International Literature on the Internal Environment of Building Practice-Based Research Networks (PBRNs).50 年来建筑实践为基础的研究网络(PBRNs)内部环境国际文献综述。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2021 Jul-Aug;34(4):762-797. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2021.04.200595.
9
Physician engagement: a concept analysis.医生参与度:一项概念分析
J Healthc Leadersh. 2019 Jul 26;11:101-113. doi: 10.2147/JHL.S214765. eCollection 2019.
10
Engaging primary care physicians in system change - an interpretive qualitative study in a remote and rural health region in Northern British Columbia, Canada.参与系统变革的初级保健医生 - 加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省北部偏远农村卫生区域的解释性定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 May 28;9(5):e028395. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028395.