Oshman Lauren, Walton Taylor, Schultz Paul, Barry Robin, Speer Linda
Department of Family Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI | Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Inova Health System, Falls Church, VA.
PRiMER. 2023 Jun 12;7:17. doi: 10.22454/PRiMER.2023.889614. eCollection 2023.
Quality improvement capacity is defined as ongoing commitment to sustained quality improvement (QI) and requires knowledge of QI methods and commitment to QI activities from practice leadership and staff. The aim of this project was to identify the major facilitators and barriers to developing quality improvement capacity in a teaching practice of a department of family medicine.
We conducted an exploratory, sequential, mixed-methods study, inviting key informants to participate in qualitative interviews and then conducting a survey of faculty, resident physicians, and staff at a community residency teaching practice affiliated with an academic medical center in the Midwest United States.
Among 12 qualitative key informant interviewees, facilitators of QI capacity included a strong motivation to provide high-quality care and a desire to leverage team-based care in QI interventions. Barriers included competing clinical and educational priorities, lack of faculty expertise in quality and scholarship, and lack of infrastructure to turn QI into scholarship. The survey response rate was 75% (48 of 64 total team members). The most common motivation for participation in QI work was "making a difference" (41, 85%), while the biggest barriers were prioritization of patient care (25, 53%), and teaching (19, 40%).
This mixed-methods study identified key barriers and facilitators to QI capacity, of which addressing competing priorities, improving QI training, and creating infrastructure for scholarship may improve QI capacity.
质量改进能力被定义为对持续质量改进(QI)的持续承诺,这需要了解QI方法,并要求实践领导者和工作人员致力于QI活动。本项目的目的是确定在一家家庭医学系的教学实践中发展质量改进能力的主要促进因素和障碍。
我们进行了一项探索性、序贯性、混合方法研究,邀请关键信息提供者参与定性访谈,然后对美国中西部一所学术医疗中心附属的社区住院医师教学实践中的教员、住院医师和工作人员进行调查。
在12名定性关键信息提供者访谈对象中,QI能力的促进因素包括提供高质量护理的强烈动机以及在QI干预中利用团队护理的愿望。障碍包括相互竞争的临床和教育重点、教员在质量和学术方面缺乏专业知识,以及缺乏将QI转化为学术成果的基础设施。调查回复率为75%(64名团队成员中的48名)。参与QI工作最常见的动机是“有所作为”(41人,85%),而最大的障碍是患者护理的优先级(25人,53%)和教学(19人,40%)。
这项混合方法研究确定了QI能力的关键障碍和促进因素,其中解决相互竞争的重点、改进QI培训以及创建学术基础设施可能会提高QI能力。