Suppr超能文献

无阿片类药物麻醉期间的麻醉深度监测——一项前瞻性观察性研究。

Anesthesia depth monitoring during opioid free anesthesia - a prospective observational study.

作者信息

Mogianos Krister, Persson Anna Km

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Halland Hospital Halmstad, Lasarettsvägen, Halmstad, SE-30581, Sweden.

Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.

出版信息

BMC Anesthesiol. 2025 Jan 24;25(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s12871-024-02859-1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients undergoing general anesthesia are more frequently monitored for depth of anesthesia using processed electroencephalography. Opioid-free anesthesia is nowadays an accepted modality for general anesthesia, however it is unclear how to interpret data from processed electroencephalography when using a mixture of non-opioid anesthetic drugs. Our objective was to describe density spectral array patterns and compare processed encephalographic data indices between opioid-free and routine opioid based anesthesia.

METHODS

This prospective observational cohort study was conducted on 30 adult patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery in a non-tertiary regional hospital. The patients underwent general anesthesia with three different methods and were monitored for anesthesia depth using processed encephalography and density spectral array. Primary outcome is a group-derived mean difference in patient state index and spectral edge frequency. As a secondary outcome a descriptive comparison of the spectral power, derived from the density spectral array, was done between groups.

RESULTS

The opioid-free anesthesia group had significantly higher patient state index and spectral edge frequency compared to routine anesthesia. Density spectral array patterns were also different, most notably lacking the high power in alpha frequency spectrum seen in the other routine anesthesia methods.

CONCLUSIONS

Processed electroencephalography monitoring can be used in opioid-free anesthesia, however clinicians should expect higher values in monitoring indices. The density spectral array pattern using a common protocol for opioid-free anesthesia, with mainly sevoflurane combined with low doses of dexmedetomidine and esketamine, differs from well described opioid and GABA-ergic anesthesia methods. These findings should be further validated using other protocols for opioid-free anesthesia in order to safely monitor anesthesia depth.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov registration number NCT06227143, registration date; 26th of January 2024.

摘要

背景

接受全身麻醉的患者越来越频繁地使用处理后的脑电图来监测麻醉深度。无阿片类药物麻醉如今是全身麻醉的一种可接受方式,然而,在使用非阿片类麻醉药物混合物时,尚不清楚如何解读处理后的脑电图数据。我们的目的是描述密度谱阵模式,并比较无阿片类药物麻醉和常规阿片类药物麻醉之间的处理后脑电图数据指标。

方法

这项前瞻性观察性队列研究在一家非三级地区医院对30例接受腹腔镜手术的成年患者进行。患者采用三种不同方法进行全身麻醉,并使用处理后的脑电图和密度谱阵监测麻醉深度。主要结局是患者状态指数和谱边缘频率的组间均值差异。作为次要结局,对两组间从密度谱阵得出的谱功率进行描述性比较。

结果

与常规麻醉相比,无阿片类药物麻醉组的患者状态指数和谱边缘频率显著更高。密度谱阵模式也有所不同,最明显的是缺乏其他常规麻醉方法中所见的α频率谱高功率。

结论

处理后的脑电图监测可用于无阿片类药物麻醉,然而临床医生应预期监测指标会有更高值。使用主要为七氟醚联合低剂量右美托咪定和艾司氯胺酮的无阿片类药物麻醉通用方案的密度谱阵模式,与描述详尽的阿片类药物和GABA能麻醉方法不同。这些发现应使用其他无阿片类药物麻醉方案进一步验证,以便安全地监测麻醉深度。

试验注册

Clinicaltrials.gov注册号NCT06227143,注册日期;2024年1月26日。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6641/11761756/e07b44b390ad/12871_2024_2859_Fig4_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验