• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

澳大利亚2型糖尿病患者中,钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2抑制剂与胰高血糖素样肽1受体激动剂相比,心血管事件风险和死亡率的性别差异:一项基于人群的队列研究。

Sex differences in risk of cardiovascular events and mortality with sodium glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors versus glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists in Australians with type 2 diabetes: a population-based cohort study.

作者信息

Sharma Abhipree, Wood Stephen, Bell J Simon, De Blasio Miles J, Ilomäki Jenni, Ritchie Rebecca H

机构信息

Heart Failure Pharmacology, Drug Discovery Biology, Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, VIC, Australia.

Centre for Medicine Use and Safety, Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, VIC, Australia.

出版信息

Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2023 Jan 31;33:100692. doi: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2023.100692. eCollection 2023 Apr.

DOI:10.1016/j.lanwpc.2023.100692
PMID:37181530
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10166999/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Sodium glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) and glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) reduce major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in people with type 2 diabetes (T2D). Despite known sex differences in diabetes-induced cardiovascular disease (CVD), pharmacological treatment recommendations are independent of sex. Our objective was to investigate possible sex differences in rates of MACE with SGLT2i vs. GLP-1RA use.

METHODS

This population-based cohort study included men and women with T2D (≥30 years), discharged from a Victorian hospital between 1st July 2013 and 1st July 2017, and dispensed an SGLT2i or GLP-1RA within 60 days of discharge. Using Cox proportional hazards regression with competing risks, subdistribution hazard ratios (sHR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated for MACE in a follow-up to 30th June 2018. Analyses were conducted for men and women, and subgroups based on age, baseline heart failure (HF), and atherosclerotic CVD (ASCVD) status.

FINDINGS

From a total of 8026 people (44.3% women, median follow-up time = 756 days), SGLT2i (n = 4231), compared to GLP-1RAs (n = 3795), reduced MACE rates in men (sHR 0.78; 95%CI 0.66-0.93), but not women. SGLT2i reduced MACE rates in men (sHR 0.72; 95%CI 0.54-0.98) and women (sHR 0.52; 95%CI 0.31-0.86) ≥65 years; in men with baseline HF (sHR 0.45; 95%CI 0.28-0.73); and in women with ASCVD (sHR 0.36; 95%CI 0.18-0.71).

INTERPRETATIONS

SGLT2i, relative to GLP-1RAs, demonstrate favourable effects for MACE reductions among older Australian men and women with T2D. Analogous benefits were also observed in men with HF and women with ASCVD.

FUNDING

Dementia Australia Yulgilbar Innovation Award.

摘要

背景

钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2抑制剂(SGLT2i)和胰高血糖素样肽1受体激动剂(GLP-1RAs)可降低2型糖尿病(T2D)患者的主要不良心血管事件(MACE)。尽管已知糖尿病诱发的心血管疾病(CVD)存在性别差异,但药物治疗建议并不考虑性别因素。我们的目的是研究使用SGLT2i与GLP-1RA时MACE发生率可能存在的性别差异。

方法

这项基于人群的队列研究纳入了2013年7月1日至2017年7月1日期间从一家维多利亚州医院出院、年龄≥30岁的T2D男性和女性患者,且在出院后60天内使用了SGLT2i或GLP-1RA。采用Cox比例风险回归模型并考虑竞争风险,估计至2018年6月30日随访期间MACE的亚分布风险比(sHR)及95%置信区间(CI)。对男性和女性以及基于年龄、基线心力衰竭(HF)和动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病(ASCVD)状态的亚组进行了分析。

研究结果

在总共8026名患者(44.3%为女性,中位随访时间 = 756天)中,与GLP-1RA组(n = 3795)相比,SGLT2i组(n = 4231)降低了男性的MACE发生率(sHR 0.78;95%CI 0.66 - 0.93),但对女性没有影响。SGLT2i降低了≥65岁男性(sHR 0.72;95%CI 0.54 - 0.98)和女性(sHR 0.52;95%CI 0.31 - 0.86)的MACE发生率;降低了基线有HF的男性(sHR 0.45;95%CI 0.28 - 0.73)和有ASCVD的女性(sHR 0.36;95%CI 0.18 - 0.71)的MACE发生率。

解读

相对于GLP-1RA,SGLT2i对降低澳大利亚老年T2D男性和女性的MACE有显著效果。在有HF的男性和有ASCVD的女性中也观察到了类似的益处。

资助

澳大利亚痴呆症尤尔吉尔巴尔创新奖

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/49ff/10166999/b732a961c4a9/gr8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/49ff/10166999/2f5b51210e21/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/49ff/10166999/405aeaf8eff9/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/49ff/10166999/f1f918fca885/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/49ff/10166999/9f5b54f68dae/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/49ff/10166999/a5d3eadde99e/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/49ff/10166999/383ab9d5d32a/gr6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/49ff/10166999/d03b787b9e1d/gr7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/49ff/10166999/b732a961c4a9/gr8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/49ff/10166999/2f5b51210e21/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/49ff/10166999/405aeaf8eff9/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/49ff/10166999/f1f918fca885/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/49ff/10166999/9f5b54f68dae/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/49ff/10166999/a5d3eadde99e/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/49ff/10166999/383ab9d5d32a/gr6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/49ff/10166999/d03b787b9e1d/gr7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/49ff/10166999/b732a961c4a9/gr8.jpg

相似文献

1
Sex differences in risk of cardiovascular events and mortality with sodium glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors versus glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists in Australians with type 2 diabetes: a population-based cohort study.澳大利亚2型糖尿病患者中,钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2抑制剂与胰高血糖素样肽1受体激动剂相比,心血管事件风险和死亡率的性别差异:一项基于人群的队列研究。
Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2023 Jan 31;33:100692. doi: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2023.100692. eCollection 2023 Apr.
2
Cardiovascular Effectiveness of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors and Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists in Older Patients in Routine Clinical Care With or Without History of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Diseases or Heart Failure.钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白 2 抑制剂和胰高血糖素样肽-1 受体激动剂在常规临床治疗中对有或无动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病或心力衰竭病史的老年患者的心血管疗效。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2022 Feb 15;11(4):e022376. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.022376. Epub 2022 Feb 8.
3
Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 Receptor Agonists Versus Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors for Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes.胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂与钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2抑制剂用于2型糖尿病患者动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病的治疗比较
Cardiol Res. 2023 Feb;14(1):12-21. doi: 10.14740/cr1459. Epub 2023 Feb 25.
4
All-cause mortality and cardiovascular outcomes with sodium-glucose Co-transporter 2 inhibitors, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and with combination therapy in people with type 2 diabetes.钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白 2 抑制剂、胰高血糖素样肽-1 受体激动剂及其联合治疗在 2 型糖尿病患者中的全因死亡率和心血管结局。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2023 Oct;25(10):2897-2909. doi: 10.1111/dom.15185. Epub 2023 Jun 29.
5
Trends in use of sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) in Australia in the era of increased evidence of their cardiovascular benefits (2014-2022).在心血管获益证据不断增加的时代,澳大利亚钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白 2 抑制剂(SGLT2i)和胰高血糖素样肽-1 受体激动剂(GLP-1RA)的使用趋势(2014-2022 年)。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2023 Sep;79(9):1239-1248. doi: 10.1007/s00228-023-03539-8. Epub 2023 Jul 14.
6
The efficacy and safety of novel classes of glucose-lowering drugs for cardiovascular outcomes: a network meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials.新型降糖药物对心血管结局的疗效和安全性:随机临床试验的网状Meta分析
Diabetologia. 2021 Dec;64(12):2676-2686. doi: 10.1007/s00125-021-05529-w. Epub 2021 Sep 18.
7
Comparison of GLP-1 receptor agonists and other Glucose-Lowering agents on cardiovascular outcomes in individuals with type 2 diabetes and Obesity: A Spanish Real-World Population-Based study.比较 GLP-1 受体激动剂和其他降糖药物在 2 型糖尿病和肥胖个体中的心血管结局:一项西班牙真实世界人群研究。
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2024 Jan;207:111071. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2023.111071. Epub 2023 Dec 22.
8
Risks of stroke, its subtypes and atrial fibrillation associated with glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists versus sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors: a real-world population-based cohort study in Hong Kong.胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂与钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2抑制剂相关的中风风险、其亚型及心房颤动:一项基于香港真实世界人群的队列研究
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2023 Feb 24;22(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s12933-023-01772-0.
9
Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors Versus Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 Receptor Agonists in Older Adults.钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白 2 抑制剂与胰高血糖素样肽 1 受体激动剂在老年患者中的比较有效性和安全性。
Diabetes Care. 2021 Mar;44(3):826-835. doi: 10.2337/dc20-1464. Epub 2021 Jan 25.
10
Characteristics predicting the efficacy of SGLT-2 inhibitors versus GLP-1 receptor agonists on major adverse cardiovascular events in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis study.预测 SGLT-2 抑制剂与 GLP-1 受体激动剂在 2 型糖尿病患者主要不良心血管事件疗效的特征:一项荟萃分析研究。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2023 Jun 28;22(1):153. doi: 10.1186/s12933-023-01877-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Differential cardiovascular risk profiles by sex among adults with CKD: a NHANES-based analysis.慢性肾脏病成年患者中按性别划分的心血管疾病风险差异:基于美国国家健康与营养检查调查的分析
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2025 May 2;12:1544590. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2025.1544590. eCollection 2025.
2
Risk of adverse outcomes associated with mirtazapine compared to sertraline use among older people living in long-term care facilities.与舍曲林相比,米氮平在长期护理机构老年人中使用时出现不良后果的风险。
Age Ageing. 2025 Mar 28;54(4). doi: 10.1093/ageing/afaf074.
3
The Promising Potency of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors in the Prevention of and as Treatment for Cognitive Impairment Among Type 2 Diabetes Patients.
钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2抑制剂在预防和治疗2型糖尿病患者认知障碍方面的潜在疗效
Biomedicines. 2024 Dec 6;12(12):2783. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines12122783.
4
SGLT2i and GLP1-RA exert additive cardiorenal protection with a RAS blocker in uninephrectomized db/db mice.在单侧肾切除的db/db小鼠中,钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2抑制剂(SGLT2i)和胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂(GLP1-RA)与肾素-血管紧张素系统(RAS)阻滞剂联合使用可发挥累加的心脏和肾脏保护作用。
Front Pharmacol. 2024 Oct 7;15:1415879. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1415879. eCollection 2024.
5
Cardiovascular and renal outcomes of glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists among patients with and without type 2 diabetes mellitus: A meta-analysis of randomized placebo-controlled trials.胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂在2型糖尿病患者和非2型糖尿病患者中的心血管和肾脏结局:一项随机安慰剂对照试验的荟萃分析
Am J Prev Cardiol. 2024 May 7;18:100679. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpc.2024.100679. eCollection 2024 Jun.
6
Emerging role of antidiabetic drugs in cardiorenal protection.抗糖尿病药物在心脏肾脏保护中的新作用。
Front Pharmacol. 2024 Feb 6;15:1349069. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1349069. eCollection 2024.
7
Sex Differences in Therapies against Myocardial Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury: From Basic Science to Clinical Perspectives.心肌缺血再灌注损伤治疗的性别差异:从基础科学到临床观点。
Cells. 2023 Aug 16;12(16):2077. doi: 10.3390/cells12162077.