• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors Versus Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 Receptor Agonists in Older Adults.钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白 2 抑制剂与胰高血糖素样肽 1 受体激动剂在老年患者中的比较有效性和安全性。
Diabetes Care. 2021 Mar;44(3):826-835. doi: 10.2337/dc20-1464. Epub 2021 Jan 25.
2
Comparing Effectiveness and Safety of SGLT2 Inhibitors vs DPP-4 Inhibitors in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and Varying Baseline HbA1c Levels.比较 SGLT2 抑制剂与 DPP-4 抑制剂在基线 HbA1c 水平不同的 2 型糖尿病患者中的疗效和安全性。
JAMA Intern Med. 2023 Mar 1;183(3):242-254. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2022.6664.
3
Cardiovascular outcomes with SGLT2 inhibitors versus DPP4 inhibitors and GLP-1 receptor agonists in patients with heart failure with reduced and preserved ejection fraction.SGLT2 抑制剂与 DPP4 抑制剂和 GLP-1 受体激动剂在射血分数降低和保留的心衰患者中的心血管结局。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2023 Mar 10;22(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s12933-023-01784-w.
4
Cardiorenal effectiveness of empagliflozin vs. glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists: final-year results from the EMPRISE study.恩格列净与胰高血糖素样肽-1 受体激动剂对心肾的疗效:来自 EMPRISE 研究的最终年度结果。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2024 Feb 8;23(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s12933-024-02150-0.
5
Comparative safety and cardiovascular effectiveness of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists in nursing homes.养老院中钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白 2 抑制剂和胰高血糖素样肽-1 受体激动剂的比较安全性和心血管效果。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2024 Aug;26(8):3403-3417. doi: 10.1111/dom.15682. Epub 2024 May 23.
6
Risk of Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes After Addition of SGLT2 Inhibitors Versus Sulfonylureas to Baseline GLP-1RA Therapy.在 GLP-1RA 治疗基础上加用 SGLT2 抑制剂与磺脲类药物相比,2 型糖尿病患者发生心血管结局的风险。
Circulation. 2021 Feb 23;143(8):770-779. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.047965. Epub 2020 Dec 11.
7
Effectiveness and safety of empagliflozin: final results from the EMPRISE study.恩格列净的有效性和安全性:EMPIRSE 研究的最终结果。
Diabetologia. 2024 Jul;67(7):1328-1342. doi: 10.1007/s00125-024-06126-3. Epub 2024 Mar 21.
8
Safety of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors in Patients with CKD and Type 2 Diabetes: Population-Based US Cohort Study.钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白 2 抑制剂在 CKD 合并 2 型糖尿病患者中的安全性:基于人群的美国队列研究。
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2023 May 1;18(5):592-601. doi: 10.2215/CJN.0000000000000115. Epub 2023 Feb 24.
9
Risks of stroke, its subtypes and atrial fibrillation associated with glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists versus sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors: a real-world population-based cohort study in Hong Kong.胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂与钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2抑制剂相关的中风风险、其亚型及心房颤动:一项基于香港真实世界人群的队列研究
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2023 Feb 24;22(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s12933-023-01772-0.
10
Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors Versus Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists and the Risk for Cardiovascular Outcomes in Routine Care Patients With Diabetes Across Categories of Cardiovascular Disease.钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白 2 抑制剂与胰高血糖素样肽-1 受体激动剂在心血管疾病不同类别患者中常规治疗的糖尿病患者心血管结局风险的比较。
Ann Intern Med. 2021 Nov;174(11):1528-1541. doi: 10.7326/M21-0893. Epub 2021 Sep 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative effectiveness and safety of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors vs glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis.钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2抑制剂与胰高血糖素样肽1受体激动剂在老年2型糖尿病患者中的疗效和安全性比较:一项荟萃分析。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2025 Aug 26;16:1486655. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2025.1486655. eCollection 2025.
2
Sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors use and the risks of genital and urinary tract infection: What should we know?钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2抑制剂的使用与生殖道和泌尿道感染风险:我们应该了解什么?
Tzu Chi Med J. 2025 Apr 4;37(3):255-263. doi: 10.4103/tcmj.tcmj_275_24. eCollection 2025 Jul-Sep.
3
Kidney Outcomes With Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists Versus Other Glucose-Lowering Agents in People With Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Real-World Data.2型糖尿病患者中胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂与其他降糖药物的肾脏结局:真实世界数据的系统评价和荟萃分析
Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2025 Jul;41(5):e70066. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.70066.
4
Comparative Effectiveness of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors Versus Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists in Reducing Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes.钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2抑制剂与胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂对2型糖尿病患者心血管事件的疗效比较
Cureus. 2025 May 14;17(5):e84137. doi: 10.7759/cureus.84137. eCollection 2025 May.
5
Comparative Safety of Second-Line Antihyperglycemic Agents in Older Adults with Type 2 Diabetes: A Multinational Real-World Evidence From LEGEND-T2DM.二线降糖药物在老年2型糖尿病患者中的安全性比较:来自LEGEND-T2DM的多国真实世界证据
medRxiv. 2025 May 9:2025.05.08.25327248. doi: 10.1101/2025.05.08.25327248.
6
Liraglutide improves peripheral perfusion and markers of angiogenesis and inflammation in people with type 2 diabetes and peripheral artery disease: An 18-month follow-up of a randomized clinical trial.利拉鲁肽改善2型糖尿病合并外周动脉疾病患者的外周灌注、血管生成及炎症标志物:一项随机临床试验的18个月随访
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2025 Jul;27(7):3891-3900. doi: 10.1111/dom.16419. Epub 2025 Apr 25.
7
Comparative cardiovascular effectiveness of newer glucose-lowering drugs in elderly with type 2 diabetes: a target trial emulation cohort study.新型降糖药物对老年2型糖尿病患者心血管疗效的比较:一项目标试验模拟队列研究
EClinicalMedicine. 2025 Mar 21;82:103162. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103162. eCollection 2025 Apr.
8
A review of the safety of sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors.钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2抑制剂的安全性综述
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2025 Jul;27(7):3598-3606. doi: 10.1111/dom.16385. Epub 2025 Apr 8.
9
A systematic literature review on the burden of diabetic ketoacidosis in type 2 diabetes mellitus.关于2型糖尿病中糖尿病酮症酸中毒负担的系统文献综述。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2025 May;27(5):2750-2767. doi: 10.1111/dom.16282. Epub 2025 Mar 3.
10
Comparative effectiveness of insulin glargine, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors in veterans with type 2 diabetes.甘精胰岛素、胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂和钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白-2抑制剂在退伍军人2型糖尿病患者中的疗效比较
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2025 Apr;27(4):2120-2130. doi: 10.1111/dom.16207. Epub 2025 Jan 30.

本文引用的文献

1
Risk of amputation with canagliflozin across categories of age and cardiovascular risk in three US nationwide databases: cohort study.三种美国全国性数据库中年龄和心血管风险类别与卡格列净截肢风险的关系:队列研究。
BMJ. 2020 Aug 25;370:m2812. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m2812.
2
Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors and the Risk of Below-Knee Amputation: A Multicenter Observational Study.钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白 2 抑制剂与膝下截肢风险:一项多中心观察性研究。
Diabetes Care. 2020 Oct;43(10):2444-2452. doi: 10.2337/dc20-0267. Epub 2020 Aug 5.
3
2019 Update to: Management of Hyperglycemia in Type 2 Diabetes, 2018. A Consensus Report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD).2019 年更新版:《2018 年美国糖尿病协会(ADA)与欧洲糖尿病研究协会(EASD)关于 2 型糖尿病患者高血糖管理的共识报告》。
Diabetes Care. 2020 Feb;43(2):487-493. doi: 10.2337/dci19-0066. Epub 2019 Dec 19.
4
Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors and the Risk for Severe Urinary Tract Infections: A Population-Based Cohort Study.钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白 2 抑制剂与严重尿路感染风险:一项基于人群的队列研究。
Ann Intern Med. 2019 Aug 20;171(4):248-256. doi: 10.7326/M18-3136. Epub 2019 Jul 30.
5
Dulaglutide and cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes (REWIND): a double-blind, randomised placebo-controlled trial.度拉糖肽与 2 型糖尿病患者的心血管结局(REWIND):一项双盲、随机、安慰剂对照试验。
Lancet. 2019 Jul 13;394(10193):121-130. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31149-3. Epub 2019 Jun 9.
6
Canagliflozin and Renal Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes and Nephropathy.卡格列净与 2 型糖尿病和肾病患者的肾脏结局。
N Engl J Med. 2019 Jun 13;380(24):2295-2306. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1811744. Epub 2019 Apr 14.
7
Comparison of the Effects of Glucagon-Like Peptide Receptor Agonists and Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors for Prevention of Major Adverse Cardiovascular and Renal Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.比较胰高血糖素样肽受体激动剂和钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白 2 抑制剂在 2 型糖尿病患者预防主要不良心血管和肾脏结局的效果。
Circulation. 2019 Apr 23;139(17):2022-2031. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.038868.
8
Fracture Risk After Initiation of Use of Canagliflozin: A Cohort Study.使用卡格列净后骨折风险:一项队列研究。
Ann Intern Med. 2019 Feb 5;170(3):155-163. doi: 10.7326/M18-0567. Epub 2019 Jan 1.
9
Sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors and risk of serious adverse events: nationwide register based cohort study.钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白 2 抑制剂与严重不良事件风险:全国基于登记的队列研究。
BMJ. 2018 Nov 14;363:k4365. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k4365.
10
SGLT2 inhibitors for primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular and renal outcomes in type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cardiovascular outcome trials.SGLT2 抑制剂用于 2 型糖尿病的心血管和肾脏结局的一级和二级预防:心血管结局试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Lancet. 2019 Jan 5;393(10166):31-39. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32590-X. Epub 2018 Nov 10.

钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白 2 抑制剂与胰高血糖素样肽 1 受体激动剂在老年患者中的比较有效性和安全性。

Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors Versus Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 Receptor Agonists in Older Adults.

机构信息

Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA

Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.

出版信息

Diabetes Care. 2021 Mar;44(3):826-835. doi: 10.2337/dc20-1464. Epub 2021 Jan 25.

DOI:10.2337/dc20-1464
PMID:33495295
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7896266/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Both sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) and glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) demonstrated cardiovascular benefits in randomized controlled trials of patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) generally <65 years old and mostly with cardiovascular disease. We aimed to evaluate the comparative effectiveness and safety of SGLT2i and GLP-1RA among real-world older adults.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Using Medicare data (April 2013-December 2016), we identified 90,094 propensity score-matched (1:1) T2D patients ≥66 years old initiating SGLT2i or GLP-1RA. Primary outcomes were major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (i.e., myocardial infarction, stroke, or cardiovascular death) and hospitalization for heart failure (HHF). Other outcomes included diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA), genital infections, fractures, lower-limb amputations (LLA), acute kidney injury (AKI), severe urinary tract infections, and overall mortality. We estimated hazard ratios (HRs) and rate differences (RDs) per 1,000 person-years, controlling for 140 baseline covariates.

RESULTS

Compared with GLP-1RA, SGLT2i initiators had similar MACE risk (HR 0.98 [95% CI 0.87, 1.10]; RD -0.38 [95% CI -2.48, 1.72]) and reduced HHF risk (HR 0.68 [95% CI 0.57, 0.80]; RD -3.23 [95% CI -4.68, -1.77]), over a median follow-up of ∼6 months. They also had 0.7 more DKA events (RD 0.72 [95% CI 0.02, 1.41]), 0.9 more LLA (RD 0.90 [95% CI 0.10, 1.70]), 57.1 more genital infections (RD 57.08 [95% CI 53.45, 60.70]), and 7.1 fewer AKI events (RD -7.05 [95% CI -10.27, -3.83]) per 1,000 person-years.

CONCLUSIONS

Among older adults, those taking SGLT2i had similar MACE risk, decreased HHF risk, and increased risk of DKA, LLA, and genital infections versus those taking GLP-1RA.

摘要

目的

钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白 2 抑制剂(SGLT2i)和胰高血糖素样肽 1 受体激动剂(GLP-1RA)在一般年龄<65 岁且大多患有心血管疾病的 2 型糖尿病(T2D)患者的随机对照试验中均显示出心血管获益。我们旨在评估 SGLT2i 和 GLP-1RA 在真实世界老年人群中的比较有效性和安全性。

研究设计和方法

利用医疗保险数据(2013 年 4 月至 2016 年 12 月),我们确定了 90,094 名年龄≥66 岁、起始使用 SGLT2i 或 GLP-1RA 的倾向评分匹配(1:1)的 T2D 患者。主要结局为主要不良心血管事件(MACE)(即心肌梗死、中风或心血管死亡)和心力衰竭住院(HHF)。其他结局包括糖尿病酮症酸中毒(DKA)、生殖器感染、骨折、下肢截肢(LLA)、急性肾损伤(AKI)、严重尿路感染和全因死亡率。我们估计了每 1000 人年的风险比(HR)和率差(RD),并控制了 140 个基线协变量。

结果

与 GLP-1RA 相比,SGLT2i 起始治疗者的 MACE 风险相似(HR 0.98 [95% CI 0.87, 1.10];RD -0.38 [95% CI -2.48, 1.72]),HHF 风险降低(HR 0.68 [95% CI 0.57, 0.80];RD -3.23 [95% CI -4.68, -1.77]),中位随访时间约为 6 个月。SGLT2i 起始治疗者的 DKA 事件多 0.7 例(RD 0.72 [95% CI 0.02, 1.41]),LLA 多 0.9 例(RD 0.90 [95% CI 0.10, 1.70]),生殖器感染多 57.08 例(RD 57.08 [95% CI 53.45, 60.70]),AKI 事件少 7.1 例(RD -7.05 [95% CI -10.27, -3.83])。

结论

在老年人群中,与 GLP-1RA 相比,使用 SGLT2i 的患者 MACE 风险相似,HHF 风险降低,而 DKA、LLA 和生殖器感染的风险增加。