Suppr超能文献

托珠单抗治疗异基因造血细胞移植后使用环磷酰胺的移植物抗宿主病预防方案后发生细胞因子释放综合征

Tocilizumab for Cytokine Release Syndrome Management After Haploidentical Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation With Post-Transplantation Cyclophosphamide-Based Graft-Versus-Host Disease Prophylaxis.

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, California.

Department of Hematology and Hematopoietic cell transplantation, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, California.

出版信息

Transplant Cell Ther. 2023 Aug;29(8):515.e1-515.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jtct.2023.05.008. Epub 2023 May 12.

Abstract

Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) is a common complication after haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplantation (HaploHCT). Severe CRS after haploHCT leads to higher risk of non-relapse mortality (NRM) and worse overall survival (OS). Tocilizumab (TOCI) is an interleukin-6 receptor inhibitor and is commonly used as first-line for CRS management after chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy, but the impact of TOCI administration for CRS management on Haplo HCT outcomes is not known. In this single center retrospective analysis, we compared HCT outcomes in patients treated with or without TOCI for CRS management after HaploHCT with post-transplantation cyclophosphamide- (PTCy-) based graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) prophylaxis. Of the 115 patients eligible patients who underwent HaploHCT at City of Hope between 2019 to 2021 and developed CRS, we identified 11 patients who received tocilizumab for CRS management (TOCI). These patients were matched with 21 patients who developed CRS but did not receive tocilizumab (NO-TOCI) based on age at the time of HCT (≤64 years or >65 years or older), conditioning intensity (myeloablative versus reduced-intensity/nonmyeloablative), and CRS grading (1, 2, versus 3-4). Instead of 22 controls, we chose 21 patients because there was only 1 control matched with 1 TOCI treatment patient in 1 stratum. With only 11 patients in receiving tocilizumab for CRS treatment, matching with 21 patients who developed CRS but did not receive tocilizumab, we had 80% power to detect big differences (hazard ratio [HR] = 3.4 or higher) in transplantation outcomes using a 2-sided 0.05 test. The power would be reduced to about 20% to 30% if the difference was moderate (HR = 2.0) using the same test. No CRS-related deaths were recorded in either group. Median time to neutrophil engraftment was 21 days (range 16-43) in TOCI and 18 days (range 14-23) in NO-TOCI group (HR = 0.55; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.28-1.06, P = .08). Median time to platelet engraftment was 34 days (range 20-81) in TOCI and 28 days (range 12-94) in NO-TOCI group (HR = 0.56; 95% CI = 0.25-1.22, P = .19). Cumulative incidences of day 100 acute GvHD grades II-IV (P = .97) and grades III-IV (P = .47) were similar between the 2 groups. However, cumulative incidence of chronic GvHD at 1 year was significantly higher in patients receiving TOCI (64% versus 24%; P = .05). Rates of NRM (P = .66), relapse (P = .83), disease-free survival (P = .86), and overall survival (P = .73) were similar at 1 year after HCT between the 2 groups. Tocilizumab administration for CRS management after HaploHCT appears to be safe with no short-term adverse effect and no effect on relapse rate. However, the significantly higher cumulative incidence of chronic GvHD, negates the high efficacy of PTCy on GvHD prophylaxis in this patient population. Therefore using tocilizumab for CRS management in the HaploHCT population with PTCy maybe kept only for patients with severe CRS. The impact on such approach on long term outcome in HaploHCT with PTCy will need to be evaluated in a larger retrospective study or a prospective manner.

摘要

细胞因子释放综合征 (CRS) 是单倍体造血细胞移植 (HaploHCT) 后常见的并发症。HaploHCT 后严重的 CRS 导致非复发死亡率 (NRM) 更高,总生存 (OS) 更差。托珠单抗 (TOCI) 是一种白细胞介素-6 受体抑制剂,常用于嵌合抗原受体 T 细胞治疗后 CRS 的一线治疗,但 TOCI 给药管理 CRS 对 Haplo HCT 结果的影响尚不清楚。在这项单中心回顾性分析中,我们比较了在 HaploHCT 后使用或不使用 TOCI 管理 CRS 并接受基于移植后环磷酰胺 (PTCy) 的移植物抗宿主病 (GvHD) 预防的患者的 HCT 结果。在 2019 年至 2021 年期间在希望之城接受 HaploHCT 并发生 CRS 的 115 名合格患者中,我们确定了 11 名接受托珠单抗治疗 CRS 的患者 (TOCI)。根据 HCT 时的年龄 (≤64 岁或>65 岁或以上)、预处理强度 (骨髓清除性与减轻强度/非骨髓清除性) 和 CRS 分级 (1、2 与 3-4),这些患者与 21 名未接受托珠单抗治疗 CRS 的患者 (NO-TOCI) 进行匹配。我们选择了 21 名对照患者,而不是 22 名对照患者,因为在 1 个分层中只有 1 名对照患者与 1 名 TOCI 治疗患者相匹配。由于仅接受 11 名患者接受托珠单抗治疗 CRS,与 21 名发生 CRS 但未接受托珠单抗治疗的患者相匹配,我们使用双侧 0.05 检验有 80%的能力检测移植结果的大差异 (危险比 [HR] = 3.4 或更高)。如果使用相同的检验,差异适中 (HR = 2.0),则功效将降低到约 20%至 30%。在两组中均未记录与 CRS 相关的死亡。在 TOCI 组中,中性粒细胞植入的中位时间为 21 天 (范围 16-43),在 NO-TOCI 组中为 18 天 (范围 14-23) (HR = 0.55; 95%置信区间 [CI] = 0.28-1.06,P = 0.08)。在 TOCI 组中,血小板植入的中位时间为 34 天 (范围 20-81),在 NO-TOCI 组中为 28 天 (范围 12-94) (HR = 0.56; 95% CI = 0.25-1.22,P = 0.19)。第 100 天急性 GvHD Ⅱ-Ⅳ级 (P = 0.97) 和Ⅲ-Ⅳ级 (P = 0.47) 的累积发生率在两组之间相似。然而,接受 TOCI 治疗的患者中慢性 GvHD 的 1 年累积发生率显著更高 (64%比 24%; P = 0.05)。在 HCT 后 1 年,NRM 率 (P = 0.66)、复发率 (P = 0.83)、无病生存率 (P = 0.86) 和总生存率 (P = 0.73) 在两组之间相似。HaploHCT 后使用 TOCI 治疗 CRS 似乎是安全的,没有短期不良反应,也没有影响复发率。然而,慢性 GvHD 的累积发生率显著更高,否定了 PTCy 在该患者人群中对 GvHD 预防的高疗效。因此,在接受 PTCy 预防的 HaploHCT 人群中,使用托珠单抗治疗 CRS 可能仅适用于严重 CRS 的患者。在接受 PTCy 的 HaploHCT 中,这种方法对长期结果的影响需要在更大的回顾性研究或前瞻性研究中进行评估。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验