• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
PRO-CTCAE reveals under-recognition of dermatologic symptom burden in hospitalized cancer patients.PRO-CTCAE 揭示了住院癌症患者皮肤症状负担的识别不足。
Support Care Cancer. 2023 May 15;31(6):337. doi: 10.1007/s00520-023-07793-5.
2
Outcome Measurement Instruments Used to Evaluate Dermatologic Adverse Events in Cancer Trials: A Systematic Review.用于评估癌症试验中皮肤不良反应的结局测量工具:系统评价。
JAMA Dermatol. 2024 Jun 1;160(6):651-657. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2024.0053.
3
Outpatient dermatology consultations for oncology patients with acute dermatologic adverse events impact anticancer therapy interruption: a retrospective study.门诊皮肤科会诊对伴有急性皮肤不良反应的肿瘤患者影响抗癌治疗中断:一项回顾性研究。
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2020 Jun;34(6):1340-1347. doi: 10.1111/jdv.16159. Epub 2020 Feb 5.
4
Validity and Reliability of the US National Cancer Institute's Patient-Reported Outcomes Version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE).美国国家癌症研究所患者报告结局版通用不良事件术语标准(PRO-CTCAE)的有效性和可靠性。
JAMA Oncol. 2015 Nov;1(8):1051-9. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.2639.
5
Mapping child and adolescent self-reported symptom data to clinician-reported adverse event grading to improve pediatric oncology care and research.将儿童和青少年自我报告的症状数据与临床医生报告的不良事件分级进行映射,以改善儿科肿瘤学的护理和研究。
Cancer. 2020 Jan 1;126(1):140-147. doi: 10.1002/cncr.32525. Epub 2019 Sep 25.
6
Feasibility and acceptability of electronic symptom surveillance with clinician feedback using the Patient-Reported Outcomes version of Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE) in Danish prostate cancer patients.在丹麦前列腺癌患者中使用患者报告的不良事件通用术语标准(PRO-CTCAE)版本进行带有临床医生反馈的电子症状监测的可行性和可接受性。
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2017;1(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s41687-017-0005-6. Epub 2017 Sep 12.
7
Reliability and Validity of the Korean Language Version of the U.S. National Cancer Institute's Patient-Reported Outcomes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events.美国国家癌症研究所患者报告结局通用术语标准不良事件的韩语版的可靠性和有效性。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2020 May;59(5):1082-1088.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.01.015. Epub 2020 Feb 8.
8
Surveillance of Symptom Burden Using the Patient-Reported Outcome Version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events in Patients With Various Types of Cancers During Chemoradiation Therapy: Real-World Study.在放化疗期间,使用患者报告的不良事件通用术语标准的患者报告结局版本对各种癌症患者的症状负担进行监测:真实世界研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2023 Mar 8;9:e44105. doi: 10.2196/44105.
9
Comparison of Patient- and Practitioner-Reported Toxic Effects Associated With Chemoradiotherapy for Head and Neck Cancer.头颈部癌放化疗相关的患者报告与从业者报告的毒性效应比较。
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016 Jun 1;142(6):517-23. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2016.0656.
10
Association between dermatologic adverse events and quality of life in lung cancer patients treated with epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors.表皮生长因子受体酪氨酸激酶抑制剂治疗的肺癌患者的皮肤不良反应与生活质量的相关性。
Support Care Cancer. 2022 Nov;30(11):9211-9219. doi: 10.1007/s00520-022-07347-1. Epub 2022 Sep 3.

本文引用的文献

1
Japanese translation and linguistic validation of the US National Cancer Institute's Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE).美国国立癌症研究所不良事件通用术语标准患者报告结局(PRO-CTCAE)的日语翻译及语言验证。
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2017;1(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s41687-017-0012-7. Epub 2017 Dec 5.
2
Making Patients and Doctors Happier - The Potential of Patient-Reported Outcomes.让患者和医生更满意——患者报告结局的潜力
N Engl J Med. 2017 Oct 5;377(14):1309-1312. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1707537.
3
Overall Survival Results of a Trial Assessing Patient-Reported Outcomes for Symptom Monitoring During Routine Cancer Treatment.一项评估常规癌症治疗期间症状监测的患者报告结局的试验的总生存结果。
JAMA. 2017 Jul 11;318(2):197-198. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.7156.
4
Cutaneous adverse effects of the immune checkpoint inhibitors.免疫检查点抑制剂的皮肤不良反应。
Curr Probl Cancer. 2017 Mar-Apr;41(2):125-128. doi: 10.1016/j.currproblcancer.2016.12.001. Epub 2016 Dec 14.
5
Exploring differences in adverse symptom event grading thresholds between clinicians and patients in the clinical trial setting.探索临床试验环境中临床医生与患者之间不良症状事件分级阈值的差异。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2017 Apr;143(4):735-743. doi: 10.1007/s00432-016-2335-9. Epub 2017 Jan 16.
6
Validity and Reliability of the US National Cancer Institute's Patient-Reported Outcomes Version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE).美国国家癌症研究所患者报告结局版通用不良事件术语标准(PRO-CTCAE)的有效性和可靠性。
JAMA Oncol. 2015 Nov;1(8):1051-9. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.2639.
7
Symptomatic toxicities experienced during anticancer treatment: agreement between patient and physician reporting in three randomized trials.抗癌治疗期间出现的有症状毒性:三项随机试验中患者报告和医生报告的一致性。
J Clin Oncol. 2015 Mar 10;33(8):910-5. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.57.9334. Epub 2015 Jan 26.
8
Cutaneous reactions to chemotherapeutic drugs and targeted therapy for cancer: Part II. Targeted therapy.癌症化疗药物和靶向治疗的皮肤反应:第二部分。靶向治疗。
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2014 Aug;71(2):217.e1-217.e11; quiz 227-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2014.04.013.
9
Cutaneous reactions to chemotherapeutic drugs and targeted therapies for cancer: part I. Conventional chemotherapeutic drugs.癌症的化疗药物和靶向治疗的皮肤反应:第一部分。常规化疗药物。
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2014 Aug;71(2):203.e1-203.e12; quiz 215-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2014.04.014.
10
A systematic review of the impact of routine collection of patient reported outcome measures on patients, providers and health organisations in an oncologic setting.在肿瘤学环境中,系统评价常规收集患者报告的结果测量对患者、提供者和卫生组织的影响。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 Jun 11;13:211. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-211.

PRO-CTCAE 揭示了住院癌症患者皮肤症状负担的识别不足。

PRO-CTCAE reveals under-recognition of dermatologic symptom burden in hospitalized cancer patients.

机构信息

Dermatology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 545 East 73rd Street, New York, NY, 10021, USA.

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

Support Care Cancer. 2023 May 15;31(6):337. doi: 10.1007/s00520-023-07793-5.

DOI:10.1007/s00520-023-07793-5
PMID:37183206
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10547098/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Dermatologic adverse events (dAEs) occur frequently in hospitalized patients and can significantly reduce quality of life. Physicians grade dAEs using the Common Terminology Criteria of Adverse Events (CTCAE). However, they often underestimate symptom frequency and severity. The patient-reported outcomes (PRO) version of the CTCAE (PRO-CTCAE) was developed to assess symptoms from the patient's perspective. In this study, we assessed the patient-reported burden of dAEs via the PRO-CTCAE questionnaire and compared results with dAE assessment by treating oncologists and dermatologists.

METHODS

Patients admitted to Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center from 6/1/2018 to 4/30/2019 and received a dermatology consultation were eligible. Once enrolled, participants completed a PRO-CTCAE questionnaire on 14 dermatologic symptoms. CTCAE grades assigned by oncology and dermatology were obtained from clinical notes, and kappa statistics were calculated to evaluate the level of agreement between physician and patient evaluations.

RESULTS

A total of 100 patients (mean age 59.4, 55% male) were prospectively enrolled. The most common patient-reported dAEs were rash (72%), swelling (67%), pruritus (64%), bruising (53%), and hives (37%). Oncologists and dermatologists underreported dAEs except for rash (median kappa values 0.3 [0.02-0.84] and 0.32 [0.02-0.87], respectively). Oncologists and dermatologists were concordant with each other's documented assessment of dAEs (median kappa value 0.985 [0.55-1]).

CONCLUSION

Oncology patient-reported dAEs in a tertiary academic oncologic referral center were under-recognized by providers. PRO-CTCAE may be a useful tool to optimize inpatient dermatologic care for cancer patients by detecting and allowing management of patient-reported dAEs.

摘要

目的

皮肤科不良事件(dAEs)在住院患者中频繁发生,并可显著降低生活质量。医生使用常见不良事件术语标准(CTCAE)来对 dAEs 进行分级。然而,他们往往低估了症状的频率和严重程度。从患者角度评估症状的患者报告结局(PRO)版 CTCAE(PRO-CTCAE)被开发出来。在这项研究中,我们通过 PRO-CTCAE 问卷评估了 dAE 对患者的报告负担,并将结果与皮肤科医生和肿瘤医生对 dAE 的评估进行了比较。

方法

2018 年 6 月 1 日至 2019 年 4 月 30 日期间,在纪念斯隆凯特琳癌症中心住院并接受皮肤科会诊的患者符合入选条件。一旦入组,参与者就会完成一份关于 14 种皮肤科症状的 PRO-CTCAE 问卷。从临床记录中获得肿瘤科和皮肤科医生的 CTCAE 分级,并计算kappa 统计值以评估医生和患者评估之间的一致性水平。

结果

共有 100 名患者(平均年龄 59.4 岁,55%为男性)前瞻性入组。最常见的患者报告的 dAEs 是皮疹(72%)、肿胀(67%)、瘙痒(64%)、瘀斑(53%)和荨麻疹(37%)。除皮疹外,肿瘤科医生和皮肤科医生均低估了 dAEs(中位数 kappa 值分别为 0.3[0.02-0.84]和 0.32[0.02-0.87])。肿瘤科医生和皮肤科医生对 dAE 的记录评估是一致的(中位数 kappa 值为 0.985[0.55-1])。

结论

在一家三级学术肿瘤转诊中心,肿瘤科患者报告的 dAEs 被提供者低估了。PRO-CTCAE 可能是一种有用的工具,可以通过检测和管理患者报告的 dAEs,优化癌症患者的住院皮肤科护理。